Just a little php script I made will display this:
To do this use this code:
[img]http://bit.ly/q4HWIc[/img]
(Based of WindowsExplorer's IP detector)
And it is open-source:
<?php
header("Content-type: image/png");
$d = date('D');
$m = date('M');
$D = date('d');
$y = date('y');
$string = " $d the $D of $m, 20$y " . $_SERVER[''];
$im = imagecreatefrompng("http://plaxon.comyr.com/images/button.PNG");
$color = imagecolorallocate($im, 88, 88, 88);
$px = (imagesx($im) - 7.5 * strlen($string)) / 4;
$py = 9;
$fontSize = 5;
imagestring($im, fontSize, $px, $py, $string, $color);
imagepng($im);
imagedestroy($im);
?>Offline
404 Not Found
Offline
TheSuccessor wrote:
404 Not Found
![]()
Fixed!
Offline
Cool! This is like a bottle of awsomeness! Maybe we could work on autoupdating images together!
Offline
Create an account on gopher forums (www.gopherprogramming.weebly.com/forums) so we can chat privately!
Offline
Also, if you don't mind, I added this to my own Auto Updating Images topic
Offline
Lol. It was based off the IP finder. Sorta.
Offline
Uh... What time zone is this in? 'cause for me it's only the 17th.
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
Uh... What time zone is this in? 'cause for me it's only the 17th.
I believe it'd GMT + 10 :S
But I thought it was based on your pc, not on me :S
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
Uh... What time zone is this in? 'cause for me it's only the 17th.
I believe it'd GMT + 10 :S
But I thought it was based on your pc, not on me :S
Apparently not... my computer says its only 15:44 17/09/11, but the little image says 18th.
Edit. Looking at other peoples images, they use different times, some say its the 17th, some say it's the 18th. Why would this be?
Last edited by markyparky56 (2011-09-17 17:38:54)
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
Uh... What time zone is this in? 'cause for me it's only the 17th.
I believe it'd GMT + 10 :S
But I thought it was based on your pc, not on me :SApparently not... my computer says its only 15:44 17/09/11, but the little image says 18th.
Edit. Looking at other peoples images, they use different times, some say its the 17th, some say it's the 18th. Why would this be?
Well mine is based off my timezone :S
It is the 18th in my timezone!
So, it must be the timezone of the uploader! :p
Offline
Last edited by wulfmaster (2011-09-17 22:26:33)
Offline
It's the timezone of the server. Some servers in Australia use GMT+10, while some other servers, for example in the U.S., use the standard EST.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
It's the timezone of the server. Some servers in Australia use GMT+10, while some other servers, for example in the U.S., use the standard EST.
Ah. Is there another way to do it?
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
LS97 wrote:
It's the timezone of the server. Some servers in Australia use GMT+10, while some other servers, for example in the U.S., use the standard EST.
Ah. Is there another way to do it?
yahoo answers wrote:
You need client side code to accomplish that. Here is a link to a website on how to implement this in JavaScript:
http://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/tips/ … cript.php3
from here
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
LS97 wrote:
It's the timezone of the server. Some servers in Australia use GMT+10, while some other servers, for example in the U.S., use the standard EST.
Ah. Is there another way to do it?
skype?
Offline
LS97 wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
LS97 wrote:
It's the timezone of the server. Some servers in Australia use GMT+10, while some other servers, for example in the U.S., use the standard EST.
Ah. Is there another way to do it?
skype?
That would mean the person needs to have skype...
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
Ah. Is there another way to do it?skype?
That would mean the person needs to have skype...
ehm, no, skype wulfmaster.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
skype?That would mean the person needs to have skype...
ehm, no, skype wulfmaster.
Uh-huh... You see, you weren't very clear there...
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
That would mean the person needs to have skype...ehm, no, skype wulfmaster.
Uh-huh... You see, you weren't very clear there...
Don't care...
Offline
LS97 wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
ehm, no, skype wulfmaster.
Uh-huh... You see, you weren't very clear there...
Don't care...
![]()
-.- You were offtopic.
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
Uh-huh... You see, you weren't very clear there...Don't care...
![]()
-.- You were offtopic.
No, he wasn't. He was telling me to get on skype to talk to me... About it..
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
LS97 wrote:
Don't care...![]()
-.- You were offtopic.
No, he wasn't. He was telling me to get on skype to talk to me... About it..
O rly? And why couldn't he do that here, on the topic thread?
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
-.- You were offtopic.No, he wasn't. He was telling me to get on skype to talk to me... About it..
O rly? And why couldn't he do that here, on the topic thread?
Because we both hate not having real-time chats.
In other words, lazy.
Offline
wulfmaster wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
wulfmaster wrote:
No, he wasn't. He was telling me to get on skype to talk to me... About it..O rly? And why couldn't he do that here, on the topic thread?
Because we both hate not having real-time chats.
![]()
In other words, lazy.
Good enough reason...
Offline