Then which would you prefer?
Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 1
Lower - 0
Hoorah for updating polls ._.
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
Then which would you prefer?
Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0
Hoorah for updating polls ._.
I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
Then which would you prefer?
Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0
Hoorah for updating polls ._.I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.
I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
Then which would you prefer?
Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0
Hoorah for updating polls ._.I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.
I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too
![]()
Scratch needs a poll thingy.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too
![]()
Scratch needs a poll thingy.
![]()
I will now go suggest that. Bye.
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too
![]()
Scratch needs a poll thingy.
![]()
I will now go suggest that. Bye.
![]()
Ok.
Vote for this!
The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:
* At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
Scratch needs a poll thingy.
![]()
I will now go suggest that. Bye.
![]()
Ok.
Vote for this!
The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:
* At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.
Not what I meant, n00b lol jk
1700th post woot
Last edited by SpriteMaster (2011-07-19 22:37:16)
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
I will now go suggest that. Bye.
![]()
Ok.
Vote for this!
The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:
* At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.Not what I meant, n00b lol jk
1700th post woot
I am not a n00b.
Last edited by ElectricSparx (2011-07-19 22:47:37)
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
SpriteMaster wrote:
I will now go suggest that. Bye.
![]()
Ok.
Not what I meant, n00b lol jk
1700th post wootI am not a n00b.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You sure? [/troll]
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
Lolwut ok vote now
Where's the poll?
Offline
jfmlove6 wrote:
I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?
No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.
Offline
I need someone to vote the poll is in its reserved but now occupied spot.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?
No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.
What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:
360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.
Besides, its not that long.
Offline
jfmlove6 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?
No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.
What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:
360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.
Besides, its not that long.
What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.
What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:
360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.
Besides, its not that long.What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.
Ohh, ok.
I don't think that will happen any time soon, the mods (not that its bad!) are very protective of new scratcher spammers these days.
Last edited by jfmlove6 (2011-07-19 23:21:43)
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:
360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.
Besides, its not that long.What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.
That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.
Offline
bananaman114 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:
360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.
Besides, its not that long.What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.
That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.
In short, thats what I said.
Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.
Offline
jfmlove6 wrote:
bananaman114 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.
In short, thats what I said.
Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.
I told you it sucks.
Offline
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
bananaman114 wrote:
That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.In short, thats what I said.
Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.I told you it sucks.
![]()
nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.
Offline
jfmlove6 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
In short, thats what I said.
Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.I told you it sucks.
![]()
nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.
+33333388838533394444445055575556444#9626#999262
9993939444433
Offline
SpriteMaster wrote:
jfmlove6 wrote:
ElectricSparx wrote:
I told you it sucks.![]()
nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.
+33333388838533394444445055575556444#9626#999262
9993939444433
LOLWUT?
Offline
In my opinion, the 60 second rule keeps us on track. If you didn't have that rule, the forums would be overflowed with random topics, and then all the mods would have to close them. So technically, whether you like it or not, it's for spammish reasons. And it's not just you. Other people have to wait, too, and they're not complaining about this.
Not to be rude or anything, but why did you post this topic? Everyone knows that the 60 second rule is staying on Scratch.
Offline
This may have been said before. but you were complaining about not being able to reply to all the posts. Well, why not reply to lots in 1 post? Saves time and space.
Offline