This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#76 2011-07-19 21:47:32

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

Then which would you prefer?

Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 1
Lower - 0

Hoorah for updating polls ._.


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#77 2011-07-19 21:51:31

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

Then which would you prefer?

Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0

Hoorah for updating polls ._.

I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#78 2011-07-19 21:54:19

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

Then which would you prefer?

Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0

Hoorah for updating polls ._.

I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.

I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too  big_smile


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#79 2011-07-19 21:55:28

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

Then which would you prefer?

Higher - 1
60 second rule - 1
30 second rule - 2
Lower - 0

Hoorah for updating polls ._.

I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.

I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too  big_smile

Scratch needs a poll thingy.  tongue


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#80 2011-07-19 21:57:23

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


I wouldn't mind it if it was a 30 second rule.

I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too  big_smile

Scratch needs a poll thingy.  tongue

I will now go suggest that. Bye.  tongue


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#81 2011-07-19 22:28:32

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

I like polls because....they're polls. Festive spam post too  big_smile

Scratch needs a poll thingy.  tongue

I will now go suggest that. Bye.  tongue

Ok.

Vote for this!

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#82 2011-07-19 22:36:39

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

Scratch needs a poll thingy.  tongue

I will now go suggest that. Bye.  tongue

Ok.

Vote for this!

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.

Not what I meant, n00b lol jk

1700th post woot

Last edited by SpriteMaster (2011-07-19 22:37:16)


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#83 2011-07-19 22:47:11

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

I will now go suggest that. Bye.  tongue

Ok.

Vote for this!

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 30 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.

Not what I meant, n00b lol jk

1700th post woot

I am not a n00b.  roll   lol   big_smile   tongue   cool

Last edited by ElectricSparx (2011-07-19 22:47:37)


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#84 2011-07-19 22:49:41

bananaman114
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

SpriteMaster wrote:

I will now go suggest that. Bye.  tongue

Ok.


Not what I meant, n00b lol jk

1700th post woot

I am not a n00b.  roll   lol   big_smile   tongue   cool

You sure? [/troll]


the sun still shines

Offline

 

#85 2011-07-19 22:53:16

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

Lolwut ok vote now


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#86 2011-07-19 23:09:45

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

Lolwut ok vote now

Where's the poll?


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#87 2011-07-19 23:11:51

jfmlove6
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/23337000/ngbbs4e84d18f6a0ee.jpg

Offline

 

#88 2011-07-19 23:14:01

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

jfmlove6 wrote:

I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?

No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#89 2011-07-19 23:14:52

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

I need someone to vote the poll is in its reserved but now occupied spot.


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#90 2011-07-19 23:16:12

jfmlove6
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?

No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.

What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:

360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.

Besides, its not that long.


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/23337000/ngbbs4e84d18f6a0ee.jpg

Offline

 

#91 2011-07-19 23:19:59

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

jfmlove6 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

I guess you miss the 360 second rule? Or the 600 second rule?

No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.

What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:

360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.

Besides, its not that long.

What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#92 2011-07-19 23:21:32

jfmlove6
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.

What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:

360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.

Besides, its not that long.

What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.

Ohh, ok.

I don't think that will happen any time soon, the mods (not that its bad!) are very protective of new scratcher spammers these days.

Last edited by jfmlove6 (2011-07-19 23:21:43)


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/23337000/ngbbs4e84d18f6a0ee.jpg

Offline

 

#93 2011-07-19 23:23:05

bananaman114
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


No, I want it lower. Like 30 seconds.

What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:

360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.

Besides, its not that long.

What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.

That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.


the sun still shines

Offline

 

#94 2011-07-19 23:30:18

jfmlove6
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

bananaman114 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

What I mean is, the rule used to be 600 seconds then after that they made it 360 seconds then they made it:

360 seconds for new scratchers
60 seconds for scratchers.

Besides, its not that long.

What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.

That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.

In short, thats what I said.

Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/23337000/ngbbs4e84d18f6a0ee.jpg

Offline

 

#95 2011-07-19 23:31:01

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

jfmlove6 wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


What I meant was: New Scratchers can have a 60 second rule, and Scratchers can have a 30 second rule.

That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.

In short, thats what I said.

Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.

I told you it sucks.  tongue


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#96 2011-07-19 23:31:44

jfmlove6
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-12-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

bananaman114 wrote:


That wouldn't deter New Scratcher Spammers. New Scratchers need to keep what they have now.

In short, thats what I said.

Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.

I told you it sucks.  tongue

nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.


http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/23337000/ngbbs4e84d18f6a0ee.jpg

Offline

 

#97 2011-07-19 23:35:22

SpriteMaster
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-01-25
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

jfmlove6 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:


In short, thats what I said.

Btw,when I posted this I got the 60 second rule thingy.

I told you it sucks.  tongue

nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.

+33333388838533394444445055575556444#9626#999262
9993939444433


`                        Click here for my YouTube channel!                        `http://i.imgur.com/4Qz3I.jpg

Offline

 

#98 2011-07-20 00:03:55

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

SpriteMaster wrote:

jfmlove6 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


I told you it sucks.  tongue

nah, not really. It goes by VERY fast.

+33333388838533394444445055575556444#9626#999262
9993939444433

LOLWUT?


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#99 2011-07-20 11:27:21

Musicstar888
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-31
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

In my opinion, the 60 second rule keeps us on track. If you didn't have that rule, the forums would be overflowed with random topics, and then all the mods would have to close them. So technically, whether you like it or not, it's for spammish reasons. And it's not just you. Other people have to wait, too, and they're not complaining about this.

Not to be rude or anything, but why did you post this topic? Everyone knows that the 60 second rule is staying on Scratch.  hmm


Goodbye, Misc. Until we meet again.
You're not alone.

Offline

 

#100 2011-07-20 11:36:52

werdna123
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

This may have been said before. but you were complaining about not being able to reply to all the posts. Well, why not reply to lots in 1 post? Saves time and space.

Offline

 

Board footer