This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2011-07-19 15:43:14

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

The 60 second rule SUCKS.

Do you agree?

The 60 Second Rule wrote:

No.

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 60 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#2 2011-07-19 15:45:52

knuckles2001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-12
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

Do you agree?

The 60 Second Rule wrote:

No.

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 60 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.

I hate that quite a lot. Example:

Somebody wrote:

All these people are commenting on my post, but I can't answer them all! I can't take it!

Offline

 

#3 2011-07-19 15:46:36

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

knuckles2001 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

Do you agree?

The 60 Second Rule wrote:

No.

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 60 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.

I hate that quite a lot. Example:

Somebody wrote:

All these people are commenting on my post, but I can't answer them all! I can't take it!

I know. We need like a 30 second rule.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#4 2011-07-19 15:48:57

knuckles2001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-03-12
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

knuckles2001 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

Do you agree?

I hate that quite a lot. Example:

Somebody wrote:

All these people are commenting on my post, but I can't answer them all! I can't take it!

I know. We need like a 30 second rule.

...no. 5 second rule!  big_smile  (oh darnnit. when i tried to post it, it had that stupid 60 sec. rule D:<)

Offline

 

#5 2011-07-19 15:55:25

SuperYoshiluver13
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-06-02
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

Well its a lot better than the 180 second rule!


http://oi52.tinypic.com/196mh2.jpghttp://oi54.tinypic.com/n2ivwl.jpghttp://img580.imageshack.us/img580/618/imew.pnghttp://i55.tinypic.com/2v2bjmx.png

Offline

 

#6 2011-07-19 15:55:59

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

knuckles2001 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

knuckles2001 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

Do you agree?

I hate that quite a lot. Example:

I know. We need like a 30 second rule.

...no. 5 second rule!  big_smile  (oh darnnit. when i tried to post it, it had that stupid 60 sec. rule D:<)

No. Scratch Team would never let us have 5 second rule. Maybe a 15 second rule. But we could use a 30 second rule.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#7 2011-07-19 16:09:59

agscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

There is a 60 second rule in order to decrease SEO spam. It makes Scratch better. Plus, be thankful that it's not the 360 second rule for you.


http://narwhaler.com/img/yu/5/no-barrel-i-insist-after-you-spiderman-yU5Ua7.jpg

Offline

 

#8 2011-07-19 16:15:00

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

agscratcher wrote:

There is a 60 second rule in order to decrease SEO spam. It makes Scratch better. Plus, be thankful that it's not the 360 second rule for you.

Dude, I'm only saying that because we get so many replies, but the stupid 60 second rule doesn't let us post them fast enough. 30 seconds does decrease spam. And normal people can make a forum post in 30 seconds.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#9 2011-07-19 16:16:11

veggieman001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

I like the 60 second rule. It makes it so less moderation is required.


Posts: 20000 - Show all posts

Offline

 

#10 2011-07-19 16:17:38

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

veggieman001 wrote:

I like the 60 second rule. It makes it so less moderation is required.

You only like it because you're not famous, so you don't have to reply to 10 comments or more.
[copy paste spam removed by moderator]

Last edited by demosthenes (2011-07-19 16:42:51)


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#11 2011-07-19 16:24:12

agscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

You only like it because you're not famous, so you don't have to reply to 10 comments or more.

You're famous? Never heard of you. :S


http://narwhaler.com/img/yu/5/no-barrel-i-insist-after-you-spiderman-yU5Ua7.jpg

Offline

 

#12 2011-07-19 16:26:29

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

agscratcher wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

You only like it because you're not famous, so you don't have to reply to 10 comments or more.

You're famous? Never heard of you. :S

Because I'm secret.

Our enemy:

The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 60 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#13 2011-07-19 16:27:16

agscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


You only like it because you're not famous, so you don't have to reply to 10 comments or more.



The following errors need to be corrected before the message can be posted:

    * At least 60 seconds have to pass between posts. Please wait a little while and try posting again.

[unnecessary spaced removed by moderator]

Reported for spamming up the topic.

It isn't spam, it's supposed to be random.

Hence, it is spam.


http://narwhaler.com/img/yu/5/no-barrel-i-insist-after-you-spiderman-yU5Ua7.jpg

Offline

 

#14 2011-07-19 16:27:37

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

brettman98 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

Reported for spamming up the topic.

It isn't spam, it's supposed to be random.

it's spam. Posting that 100 times is spam.

And how do you know how many times I posted it? HMM?


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#15 2011-07-19 16:29:51

agscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

brettman98 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


It isn't spam, it's supposed to be random.

it's spam. Posting that 100 times is spam.

And how do you know how many times I posted it? HMM?

Guestimating.


We understand your plea, but rants are unnecessary. Thank you for your time.


http://narwhaler.com/img/yu/5/no-barrel-i-insist-after-you-spiderman-yU5Ua7.jpg

Offline

 

#16 2011-07-19 16:31:06

sparks
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-11-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

I do have trouble updating forum threads that I run due to the rule but I'm happy to put up with it for it's benifits. The other day in advanced topics we had someone posting links to... certain sites that aren't a good idea to post on the Scratch fora at all. He was a new Scratcher so he had the 180 second rule. He still had time to post the links on about six threads before a moderator logged in and saw my reports. Think how many topics he could have posted on with no rule at all!

It's worth putting up with to make the site safer and the moderator job easier  tongue


http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/7563/scratchbetabanner.png

Offline

 

#17 2011-07-19 16:32:31

agscratcher
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-07-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

sparks wrote:

I do have trouble updating forum threads that I run due to the rule but I'm happy to put up with it for it's benifits. The other day in advanced topics we had someone posting links to... certain sites that aren't a good idea to post on the Scratch forums at all. He was a new Scratcher so he had the 180 second rule. He still had time to post the links on about six threads before a moderator logged in and saw my reports. Think how many topics he could have posted on with no rule at all!

It's worth putting up with to make the site safer and the moderator job easier  tongue

^this and fixed


http://narwhaler.com/img/yu/5/no-barrel-i-insist-after-you-spiderman-yU5Ua7.jpg

Offline

 

#18 2011-07-19 16:35:42

veggieman001
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

you're not famous

I'm really offended.


Posts: 20000 - Show all posts

Offline

 

#19 2011-07-19 16:41:39

ToxicQuillz
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-11-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

I'm quite fine with the 60 second rule. On this other forums, I have to wait 8 hours for my post to show up.


You lived a good four years, Scratch 1.4... May you rest in peace...
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sad_face.gif

Offline

 

#20 2011-07-19 16:46:05

demosthenes
Retired Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-02-19
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

Please do not copy and paste to produce large blocks of text, it is annoying for moderators and users alike, and it most certainly is spam.

I understand your complaints, but there is no reason to make the job of moderators harder by copy-pasting uselessly.


I've taken a long hiatus, but I still visit sometimes. Give me some time to answer any messages you post on my projects!

Offline

 

#21 2011-07-19 16:46:18

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ToxicQuillz wrote:

I'm quite fine with the 60 second rule. On this other forums, I have to wait 8 hours for my post to show up.

Really? I only hate it because it post a lot. Random question: Do you go on the TBGs? They are awesome.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#22 2011-07-19 16:49:10

JJROCKER
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

agscratcher wrote:

There is a 60 second rule in order to decrease SEO spam. It makes Scratch better. Plus, be thankful that it's not the 360 second rule for you.

Agreed


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&amp;return=image&amp;link1=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3491/signature1y.jpg&amp;link2=http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/5272/signature1sx.jpg&amp;link3=http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8514/signature1et.jpg&amp;link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&amp;link5=http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4640/jjrockerfinal.jpg

Offline

 

#23 2011-07-19 16:59:44

lilacfuzz101
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

There is a 60 second rule in order to decrease SEO spam. It makes Scratch better. Plus, be thankful that it's not the 360 second rule for you.

Dude, I'm only saying that because we get so many replies, but the stupid 60 second rule doesn't let us post them fast enough. 30 seconds does decrease spam. And normal people can make a forum post in 30 seconds.

Well, meaningfull replies normally take more than 60 seconds to type up. Just be glad we don't have a system where you can't post a project until after 2 days have passed and you can't have an avatar or use the forums for 24 hours after creating your account.


http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzqaicLrY01r5wdo7o1_500.gif

Offline

 

#24 2011-07-19 17:02:31

ElectricSparx
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-02-16
Posts: 100+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

There is a 60 second rule in order to decrease SEO spam. It makes Scratch better. Plus, be thankful that it's not the 360 second rule for you.

Dude, I'm only saying that because we get so many replies, but the stupid 60 second rule doesn't let us post them fast enough. 30 seconds does decrease spam. And normal people can make a forum post in 30 seconds.

Well, meaningfull replies normally take more than 60 seconds to type up. Just be glad we don't have a system where you can't post a project until after 2 days have passed and you can't have an avatar or use the forums for 24 hours after creating your account.

Some meaningful replies don't take 60 second to type up. I have typed up replies in 30 seconds.


Lead Developer for Scratch Adventure

Offline

 

#25 2011-07-19 17:06:11

lilacfuzz101
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: The 60 second rule SUCKS.

ElectricSparx wrote:

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

ElectricSparx wrote:


Dude, I'm only saying that because we get so many replies, but the stupid 60 second rule doesn't let us post them fast enough. 30 seconds does decrease spam. And normal people can make a forum post in 30 seconds.

Well, meaningfull replies normally take more than 60 seconds to type up. Just be glad we don't have a system where you can't post a project until after 2 days have passed and you can't have an avatar or use the forums for 24 hours after creating your account.

Some meaningful replies don't take 60 second to type up. I have typed up replies in 30 seconds.

I'm just saying a good number of them do. Not all of us can type as fast as you apparently  tongue


http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzqaicLrY01r5wdo7o1_500.gif

Offline

 

Board footer