Scratch
archived forums
#126 2011-08-01 09:57:16
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
soupoftomato wrote:
You guys no that vampires Sparkle to avoid Edward *gasp* NOT being a Mary-Sue? I mean, why have the possibility or the danger of a character actually having a FLAW? It's unthinkable! What type of person has FLAWS? I mean where's the drama and tensity and having someone that could die at any moment? It's much more serious if he sparkles instead. It all ends up better this way!
not a FLAW
oh god just thinking of it makes me sick to my stomach!
PesterChum Handle: annoyingAnchorman
durp yo terezi sup sup gotta beat john gotta beat john
Offline
#127 2011-08-01 10:01:26
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
imnotbob wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
You guys no that vampires Sparkle to avoid Edward *gasp* NOT being a Mary-Sue? I mean, why have the possibility or the danger of a character actually having a FLAW? It's unthinkable! What type of person has FLAWS? I mean where's the drama and tensity and having someone that could die at any moment? It's much more serious if he sparkles instead. It all ends up better this way!
not a FLAW
oh god just thinking of it makes me sick to my stomach!
Um.
No I said Edward is a sparkly dude so that he has no chance of dying and it's just another thing for Bella to call "gorgeous".
She removed the only sense of danger or flaw there is in Edward to make a character commonly described as perfect. But is there more tension in and dying at or any moment, or being seen as glitter?
You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?
Last edited by soupoftomato (2011-08-01 10:01:49)
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#128 2011-08-01 10:04:52
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
soupoftomato wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
You guys no that vampires Sparkle to avoid Edward *gasp* NOT being a Mary-Sue? I mean, why have the possibility or the danger of a character actually having a FLAW? It's unthinkable! What type of person has FLAWS? I mean where's the drama and tensity and having someone that could die at any moment? It's much more serious if he sparkles instead. It all ends up better this way!
not a FLAW
oh god just thinking of it makes me sick to my stomach!Um.
No I said Edward is a sparkly dude so that he has no chance of dying and it's just another thing for Bella to call "gorgeous".
She removed the only sense of danger or flaw there is in Edward to make a character commonly described as perfect. But is there more tension in and dying at or any moment, or being seen as glitter?
You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?
yes
now, my turn: You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?
PesterChum Handle: annoyingAnchorman
durp yo terezi sup sup gotta beat john gotta beat john
Offline
#129 2011-08-01 10:06:42
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
imnotbob wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
not a FLAW
oh god just thinking of it makes me sick to my stomach!Um.
No I said Edward is a sparkly dude so that he has no chance of dying and it's just another thing for Bella to call "gorgeous".
She removed the only sense of danger or flaw there is in Edward to make a character commonly described as perfect. But is there more tension in and dying at or any moment, or being seen as glitter?
You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?yes
now, my turn: You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?
Wait.
YOU THOUGHT I MEANT EDWARD HAS FLAWS? 
No I meant the whole reason for sparkling is so there's no danger of him dying.
--- This whole passage completely serious ---
Last edited by soupoftomato (2011-08-01 10:07:28)
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#130 2011-08-01 10:07:35
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
soupoftomato wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
Um.
No I said Edward is a sparkly dude so that he has no chance of dying and it's just another thing for Bella to call "gorgeous".
She removed the only sense of danger or flaw there is in Edward to make a character commonly described as perfect. But is there more tension in and dying at or any moment, or being seen as glitter?
You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?yes
now, my turn: You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?Wait.
YOU THOUGHT I MEANT EDWARD HAS FLAWS?
No I meant the whole reason for sparkling is so there's no danger of him dying.
xD
ik.
PesterChum Handle: annoyingAnchorman
durp yo terezi sup sup gotta beat john gotta beat john
Offline
#131 2011-08-01 10:12:43
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
imnotbob wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
imnotbob wrote:
yes
now, my turn: You realize the whole passage you replied to was sarcastic?Wait.
YOU THOUGHT I MEANT EDWARD HAS FLAWS?
No I meant the whole reason for sparkling is so there's no danger of him dying.xD
ik.
In defense?
Or do we agree? 
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#132 2011-08-02 03:29:31
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
soupoftomato wrote:
helltank wrote:
soupoftomato, cancem, GLADOS2 and Swell....
[Elder Swear]Nice to no you swear at us instead of answering to the argument.
Ragers gotta rage.
There isn't any argument, anyway. Twilight haters will always claim Edward is a Mary Sue, Harry Potter haters will always claim Harry is a stupid idiot and Edward HAS flaws.
Both are equally untrue, so those who sit on the fence usually whip out sniper rifles and take pot shots at anyone straying too close.
Error:Signature could not load. Please wait for an indefinite amount of time, until you realize you're gullible and go off to look for another potentially interesting signature to stare at.
Offline
#133 2011-08-07 15:44:20
- Trekkie210
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-08-04
- Posts: 500+
Re: Harry Potter vs. Twilight Debate
helltank wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
helltank wrote:
soupoftomato, cancem, GLADOS2 and Swell....
[Elder Swear]Nice to no you swear at us instead of answering to the argument.
Ragers gotta rage.
There isn't any argument, anyway. Twilight haters will always claim Edward is a Mary Sue, Harry Potter haters will always claim Harry is a stupid idiot and Edward HAS flaws.
Both are equally untrue, so those who sit on the fence usually whip out sniper rifles and take pot shots at anyone straying too close.
You are ABSOLUTELY right. Edward DOES have flaws- the first and foremost being he is a character in Twilight.
Offline