ProgrammingFreak wrote:
ssss wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
We are not sure. At the rate we have been going, about a month.Nah, it will probably be a couple of weeks, it depends if xIIV wants the image and how long it takes ProgrammingFreak to contact him.
Lol. I am working on 0.4 at the moment, if he doesn't want it
![]()
about the website: Do whatever you like ;")You can have it.
![]()
Goody
What would you like added in?
Offline
Pecola1 wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
is the password creeper? lol.
I got into the source.Didn't you see it on the other thread? LOL You quoted it. XD
I knew that to, if you enter the wrong password, you can just goto the debugger and just try all of the places in the debugger, until you find something like t1/t2=creeper or password=creeper!
Offline
WindowsExplorer wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
is the password creeper? lol.
I got into the source.Didn't you see it on the other thread? LOL You quoted it. XD
I knew that to, if you enter the wrong password, you can just goto the debugger and just try all of the places in the debugger, until you find something like t1/t2=creeper or password=creeper!
No kidding. XD We may fix that. Thanks for shouting out to the world the pass. XD Nah, its okay, we will remove it when we make 1.0.
Offline
ssss wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
ssss wrote:
Lol. I am working on 0.4 at the moment, if he doesn't want it![]()
about the website: Do whatever you like ;")You can have it.
![]()
Goody
![]()
What would you like added in?
Well, I'm currently thinking of some blocks....
boolean if() True <> False <> block.
boolIf: t1 trueDo: t2 else: t3 t1 = true ifTrue: [ ^true ] ifFalse: [ ^false ].
This will allow you to do a certain thing if one is true or false. Like you could repeat something 5 times if variable 'hi' = 5. But if 'hi' = 4 then you could repeat 4 times. Or something like that.
Offline
xIIV wrote:
ssss wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
You can have it.![]()
Goody
![]()
What would you like added in?Well, I'm currently thinking of some blocks....
boolean if() True <> False <> block.Code:
boolIf: t1 trueDo: t2 false: t3 t1 = true ifTrue: [ ^true ] ifFalse: [ ^false ].This will allow you to do a certain thing if one is true or false. Like you could repeat something 5 times if variable 'hi' = 5. But if 'hi' = 4 then you could repeat 4 times. Or something like that.
![]()
Oops, just realized that that isn't right.
boolIf: t1 trueDo: t2 false: t3 t1 = true ifTrue: [ ^t2 ] ifFalse: [ ^t3 ].
Now that should work.
Offline
Hi my internet is working. But I am going on vacation on the 8th. So I wont be able to go on scratch from then till like the 10th of August or somethinarather.
Last edited by Pecola1 (2011-07-06 09:26:45)
Offline
Just checking on the status of Rocket.
Offline
Offline
owetre18 wrote:
You guys need blocks? I might be able to help.
I don't think we need help with blocks right now, I know most of the ones we want and know ones that we don't we I have enough in my image to look at and decide.
Offline
Just a question... this looks epic. When do you plan to release 1.0?
Last edited by TuragaTreeko (2011-07-13 15:07:38)
Offline
@TuragaTreeko: It looks like we've stopped, yet again... I can get everyone working again though. Yay for being an optimistic guy. Anyway, I suppose we should work on a release schedule...
1.0 will be out when it's out. We shall comment on one of your projects if a main build is released
Offline
Should xIIV just do blocks?
For now at least?
Last edited by ProgrammingFreak (2011-07-13 20:38:31)
Offline
Qwiffles wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Should xIIV just do blocks?
For now at least?Sure. Post on the new topic though
![]()
QWiffles? ssss? Why would- I'm not gonna even ask why. Is it really you?
Offline
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Qwiffles wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Should xIIV just do blocks?
For now at least?Sure. Post on the new topic though
![]()
QWiffles? ssss? Why would- I'm not gonna even ask why.
Is it really you?
No that was not me. However, he is right -_-
Offline