Scratch

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-13 05:43:43

Xenon

Sorry, but we are currently not accepting new members . We may need some members later though, so keep checking this space!
We DO need some Beta-testers, though.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

News:
September 10: We reach 50 likes, I posted the pseudocode.
September 2: Wake up call!
May 25: ssss quit, Scratcher7_13 took his place.
May 13: Members/advertisers, please update your signature's links.
May 13 (Friday the 13th ): Created new thread, also my 600th post! You can visit the old thread here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Welcome to the Xenon developer's thread. We are a company that makes math-based projects. Our current mission is to make a complete calculator in Scratch — a computation engine. Here is an example. Ours will be much simpler.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Coming soon:
Xenon, a calculation engine

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Team:
Hardmath123
applejack
scimonster
amcerbu
hpotter134

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Accomplishments:
List setup engine
Important links
Our Gallery

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To advertise, use this code (full size image):

Code:

[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=63150][img]http://i.imgur.com/AJoXe.png[/img][/url]

.
or this code (tiny image):

Code:

[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=63150][img]http://i.imgur.com/zKzps.png[/img][/url]

.
New one!

Code:

[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=760843#p760843][img]http://i.imgur.com/mr9Hf.gif[/img][/url]

.
Credit line:

Code:

[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=769062#p769062]Like the pic? Click to get a similar one![/url]

Like the pic? Click to get a similar one by Joeman592!
.

Advertisers:
Hardmath123
applejack
hpotter134
scimonster
ssss
ThePCKid
VanillaCream

This is also my 600th post!

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-10-02 13:39:49)

scimonster · 2011-05-13 06:00:58

It's hard to see the Xenon in the post.

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-13 06:04:09

Good point, I'll fix it.

scimonster · 2011-05-13 06:37:29

Hardmath123 wrote:
Good point, I'll fix it.

That looks much better. smile

ssss · 2011-05-13 06:47:29

Am i only an advertiser? I thought i was a programmer hmm

I wasn't active, because i wasn't given a job.

Last edited by ssss (2011-05-13 06:51:25)

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-13 07:30:15

ssss wrote:
Am i only an advertiser? I thought i was a programmer

I wasn't active, because i wasn't given a job.

Whoops! I'll add you, too. But, checking back at the list, I'm not adding anyone else without a good reason. I don't want people who just posted 'I'll Join!' and nothing else to get credit.

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-05-13 07:31:32)

ssss · 2011-05-13 07:37:38

Hardmath123 wrote:
ssss wrote:
Am i only an advertiser? I thought i was a programmer

I wasn't active, because i wasn't given a job.
Whoops! I'll add you, too. But, checking back at the list, I'm not adding anyone else without a good reason. I don't want people who just posted 'I'll Join!' and nothing else to get credit.

lol

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-13 08:33:58

Just a question: why to you have ProgrammingFreak's old banner linked to the Block Lib?

scimonster · 2011-05-13 08:37:49

Hardmath123 wrote:
Just a question: why to you have ProgrammingFreak's old banner linked to the Block Lib?

Mixed sig day. tongue

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-13 09:19:02

scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
Just a question: why to you have ProgrammingFreak's old banner linked to the Block Lib?
Mixed sig day.

Ah.

[/offtopic]

amcerbu · 2011-05-13 13:56:49

Updated my signature. Can we get the old topic closed?

my-chemical-romance · 2011-05-13 14:11:18

I've already made a calculator btw

applejack · 2011-05-13 16:05:22

I'll be at a wedding over the weekend so bye-bye! big_smile (I might manage to get on)

Joeman592 · 2011-05-14 00:05:29

if you need help with anything, i'll be open to help

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-14 03:34:33

amcerbu wrote:
Updated my signature. Can we get the old topic closed?

No, not until all active people have posted here. I don't want people not knowing where this thread is (unlikely, but could happen).

Joeman592 · 2011-05-14 16:17:57

so what exactly is this going to be? Just a normal scratch project that answers stuff, or a hacked scratch?

amcerbu · 2011-05-14 18:58:36

Joeman592 wrote:
so what exactly is this going to be? Just a normal scratch project that answers stuff, or a hacked scratch?

It will function somewhat like a graphing calculator, or simply an expression evaluator. Try out Wolfram Alpha with an expression like 5/(4+sqrt(3/2)*5.2)^2

We will not be hacking Scratch.

Read through the previous forum topic. That should explain what you're asking better.

Last edited by amcerbu (2011-05-14 19:04:19)

Joeman592 · 2011-05-15 00:11:22

amcerbu wrote:
Joeman592 wrote:
so what exactly is this going to be? Just a normal scratch project that answers stuff, or a hacked scratch?
It will function somewhat like a graphing calculator, or simply an expression evaluator. Try out Wolfram Alpha with an expression like 5/(4+sqrt(3/2)*5.2)^2

We will not be hacking Scratch.

Read through the previous forum topic. That should explain what you're asking better.

Ok thx, i just wanted to clarify

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-15 06:49:24

I think that while we're working on the 'big' project (the cal engine), we should also work on a 'mini' project. Thoughts?

PS Googling 'xenon computation engine' puts this thread at the top match!

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-05-15 06:50:26)

scimonster · 2011-05-15 06:50:22

Hardmath123 wrote:
I think that while we're working on the 'big' project (the cal engine), we should also work on a 'mini' project. Thoughts?

Maybe it would help more people be active.
What would we do?
Do you mind if I ask the Inc. to be capitalized in the title?

Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-15 06:50:50)

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-15 06:52:00

scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
I think that while we're working on the 'big' project (the cal engine), we should also work on a 'mini' project. Thoughts?
Maybe it would help more people be active.
What would we do?

I don't know, something easy. The point is that the calc engine will require 1 at a time work, so most of us will be waiting for the rest. A mini project will keep everyone interested, and also improve our reputation as a good collab.

scimonster · 2011-05-15 06:56:42

Hardmath123 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
I think that while we're working on the 'big' project (the cal engine), we should also work on a 'mini' project. Thoughts?
Maybe it would help more people be active.
What would we do?
I don't know, something easy. The point is that the calc engine will require 1 at a time work, so most of us will be waiting for the rest. A mini project will keep everyone interested, and also improve our reputation as a good collab.

Yeah, I figured out the point. tongue
Maybe we could do something that does long division.

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-15 06:58:54

scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Maybe it would help more people be active.
What would we do?
I don't know, something easy. The point is that the calc engine will require 1 at a time work, so most of us will be waiting for the rest. A mini project will keep everyone interested, and also improve our reputation as a good collab.
Yeah, I figured out the point.
Maybe we could do something that does long division.

Good idea: maybe something to do sums, and show the steps!

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2011-05-15 07:00:48)

scimonster · 2011-05-15 07:03:32

Hardmath123 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:

I don't know, something easy. The point is that the calc engine will require 1 at a time work, so most of us will be waiting for the rest. A mini project will keep everyone interested, and also improve our reputation as a good collab.
Yeah, I figured out the point.
Maybe we could do something that does long division.
Good idea: maybe something to do sums, and show the steps!

That's a good idea. smile

Hardmath123 · 2011-05-15 07:11:05

scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Yeah, I figured out the point.
Maybe we could do something that does long division.
Good idea: maybe something to do sums, and show the steps!
That's a good idea.

Hmmm, applejack could do the number logos really well, see Virus (in his projects, I'm too lazy to link big_smile

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-05-13 05:43:43

Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Code:

Code:

Code:

Code:

#2 2011-05-13 06:00:58

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#3 2011-05-13 06:04:09

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#4 2011-05-13 06:37:29

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#5 2011-05-13 06:47:29

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#6 2011-05-13 07:30:15

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

ssss wrote:

#7 2011-05-13 07:37:38

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

ssss wrote:

#8 2011-05-13 08:33:58

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#9 2011-05-13 08:37:49

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#10 2011-05-13 09:19:02

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#11 2011-05-13 13:56:49

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#12 2011-05-13 14:11:18

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#13 2011-05-13 16:05:22

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#14 2011-05-14 00:05:29

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#15 2011-05-14 03:34:33

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

amcerbu wrote:

#16 2011-05-14 16:17:57

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#17 2011-05-14 18:58:36

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Joeman592 wrote:

#18 2011-05-15 00:11:22

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

amcerbu wrote:

Joeman592 wrote:

#19 2011-05-15 06:49:24

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

#20 2011-05-15 06:50:22

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#21 2011-05-15 06:52:00

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#22 2011-05-15 06:56:42

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#23 2011-05-15 06:58:54

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#24 2011-05-15 07:03:32

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#25 2011-05-15 07:11:05

Re: Xenon Inc. Developers' Thread

scimonster wrote: