You know what's sometimes annoying? If you put text into the answer of variable block, you can stick it in a number only spot. Since there are square inserts for text, maybe make a square block that holds text? The following blocks would be this:
join [][]
letter () of []
answer
variableThe fictional:
letters () - () of []
get [date^]
rotation style
name of costume # ()
current sound name
last broadcast
key pressed
sprite name
ascii () as character
[reverse/shuffle/upper-lowercase][]
scimonster wrote:
I forgot something in the first post!
([]), which reports it if it is a number, and 0 if not.
Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-10 23:58:36)
Offline
I forgot something in the first post!
([]), which reports it if it is a number, and 0 if not.
Offline
It would be an operators, but it wouldn't have the code you put.
('%s' #o #string:)
Offline
poemon1 wrote:
sci_test wrote:
The whole point is that it is not a Reporter Block. This is to separate between strings and numbers more easily.
oh so what type of block is it
A text block.
Offline
No not a text block. Just upgrade the variable! Scratch 2.0 could upgrade the variables, so you can type aslfjal (sorry spam) into a variable square number insert. So is that what you mean? (For that question ignore the Scratch 2.0 could upgrade the variables.)
Offline
Thescratch3 wrote:
No not a text block. Just upgrade the variable! Scratch 2.0 could upgrade the variables, so you can type aslfjal (sorry spam) into a variable square number insert. So is that what you mean? (For that question ignore the Scratch 2.0 could upgrade the variables.)
You can type text into variables, but I want a separate kind of block that reports text than from the ones that report numbers.
Offline
Oh like a text block? Like a reporter? Oh, so you want a block that reports text?
Offline
Thescratch3 wrote:
Oh like a text block? Like a reporter? Oh, so you want a block that reports text?
Yes.
Offline
Text is meant to be first class. Also panther users would get it confused with colour blocks.
Offline