Scratch

forumer · 2011-04-29 19:34:47

I would enjoy scratch a little more if they would include a <if i recieve {}> block because that would be really useful. There were many situations that I though I could use it but lets just hope it hapoens in 2.0!!!! Do you support this idea?? If you do (even if you don't) , just reply below stating the following:

~ A greeting (Hello, i'm {your name})
~ If you support it or not
~ If you support the idea, why do you?
~ A situation you had that you wished you had that block availible (optional)

Thanks. Scratch, this is a suggestion. I'm not being bossy or anything like that. I would just think it would be handy if I had that block. Thanks for reading and bye. wink

CloneCommando1 · 2011-05-06 20:10:35

That could work, but most importantly, it would have to be a block that everyone can use. It can't just be a block that a handful of users would use, it would have to be a useful block for anyone to use, not just some people.

gbear605 · 2011-05-06 20:37:17

This was a complicated block (codewise) It IS possible. This has been suggested before. Also, do

Code:

[/blocks]

after your blocks.

Last edited by gbear605 (2011-05-06 20:37:40)

joefarebrother · 2011-07-31 12:25:15

Hello, I am Joe.
I dissagree because it would only be true fore 1 millisecond. Howevere there SHOULD be wait untill i recieve [] and repeat untill i recieve[].
I do know a block someone thought of that WOULD make this work, though,
< <> within () secs>. It waits the number of seconds and if the boolean became true at any point during that time, it reports true.

Last edited by joefarebrother (2011-07-31 12:25:54)

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-04-29 19:34:47

2.0

#2 2011-05-06 20:10:35

Re: 2.0

#3 2011-05-06 20:37:17

Re: 2.0

Code:

#4 2011-07-31 12:25:15

Re: 2.0

Board footer