Do you like it? How can it be improved?
new:
this or this?
old: 
Last edited by recycle49 (2011-04-21 13:14:05)
Offline
It looks professional
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
How's mine?
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
How's mine?I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
The "We need you" one? lolwhy?
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
How's mine?I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
The "We need you" one? lolwhy?
It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.The "We need you" one? lolwhy?
It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig
![]()

Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The "We need you" one? lolwhy?It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig
![]()
That looks awesome.
Offline
08jackt wrote:
yeah i like the old one better
Well, if i could figure out how your sig works jack i could have both
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The "We need you" one? lolwhy?It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig
![]()
Yeah, you should recycle that sig
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
How's mine?
How about this?
EDIT: To small

Last edited by recycle49 (2011-04-21 12:55:12)
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig :PYeah, you should recycle that sig :)
lol I thought my current one looked more professional. :P
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Yeah, you should recycle that sig
![]()
lol I thought my current one looked more professional.
![]()
They're both awesome, but the one with the top hat is funny
You changed it!
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The "We need you" one? lolwhy?It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig
![]()
Wasn't that from a few months ago?
Offline
I like the top one the best...
Offline
hdarken wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
It was recognisable - but after I see the new one a few times, I'll get used to it - like I did for your 'candy not included' sig :PWasn't that from a few months ago?
Yep :D
Offline
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
I like the old one a bit more, but the new one still looks nice.
Offline