Scratch

Wow I like the new design for the Block Library website!

Greenatic wrote:

technoboy10 wrote:

sparks wrote:

No, I think everything is fine. I noticed the site had some down time a few hours ago, but the images are all still there 

Hmm, I still get the broken image picture on all the block renderer created pics. 

Yeah, all images seem to be down.   

I can see blocks, but not online/offline images. 

I was viewing it, and as I look now, I see all blocks and images and can view the site. It looks like blocks.scratchr is just a little shaky at the moment. If it's still doing this in a couple of hours when I'm back from work I'll email andresmh and let him know about it 

EDIT: Having said that, my siggy isn't showing up...

Last edited by sparks (2012-04-28 03:02:50)

When you go to "http://scratchr.org/" this is displayed:

scratchr.org website wrote:

NOTICE: This domain name expired on 04/26/2012 and is pending renewal or deletion

Last edited by ZeroLuck (2012-04-28 12:15:57)

Greenatic wrote:

ZeroLuck wrote:

When you go to "http://scratchr.org/" this is displayed:

scratchr.org website wrote:

NOTICE: This domain name expired on 04/26/2012 and is pending renewal or deletion

Scratch Resources is down too--looks like it's everything on *.scratchr.org.

If i was Lightnin, i'm sure i'd say "Sorry guys. We're getting it back up soon!", but in reality, i'm not sure when... :S

This is being discussed in about three threads at the moment, and everyone is doing their best to get it renewed, so please keep discussions about this to this thread!

stevetheipad wrote:

Librarians have access to the account or can edit the posts?

Yes. The library account is shared by all librarians. It was promoted to Scratcher status early by the Scratch Team as an exception because they knew me to be trustworthy and I, in turn, trust the librarians, so they don't seem to have a problem with a joint account - if that's what you're getting at. It's also only really used for posts within this thread.

The blockspec --> block generator still wishes it used verdana bold.

Hi!

I would like to share some BYOB blocks:

go to back:
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/back_1.gif
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/back_2.gif

clone (5) times:
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/clone_1.gif
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/clone_2.gif

go to layer ():
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/gtl_1.gif
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/gtl_2.gif

Hidden?:
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/hidden_1.gif
http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff468/sciteccf/hidden_2.gif

wolvesstar97 wrote:

THE BLOCKS ARE GIANT!!!!! Um... they are HUGE.

I know right?!?!?!?!

wolvesstar97 wrote:

THE BLOCKS ARE GIANT!!!!! Um... they are HUGE.

Which blocks are these? Ones in the main library? Also, are you using Internet Explorer? I've noticed image-oversizing in that browser before now.

So since you got this kinda working, are you still thinking about moving this to the Wiki? Contributing would be so much easier; just edit the page and add no more than this code:

{{Block
|title=blah
|image=blah
|category=blah
|sharer=blah
|function=blah
}}

That's got to be easier than diving into a mass of BBCode and URL's, right? And the formatting can be so much better, with real CSS and HTML tags!

Last edited by Hardmath123 (2012-05-05 09:29:09)

Hardmath123 wrote:

So since you got this kinda working, are you still thinking about moving this to the Wiki? Contributing would be so much easier; just edit the page and add no more than this code:

Code:

{{Block
|title=blah
|image=blah
|category=blah
|sharer=blah
|function=blah
}}

That's got to be easier than diving into a mass of BBCode and URL's, right? And the formatting can be so much better, with real CSS and HTML tags!

I kinda have my heart set on getting the site working, since the ST have so kindly given us our own domain! If I fail spectacularly again, though, I'll definitely use the wiki