Because scratch 1.4 has pen blocks, I think that scratch 2.0 should have:
[eraser up], [eraser down], [undo erase], <eraser up>, [change eraser size by __] [set eraser size to ___ NOTE: These blocks would have a menu to switch between pen and eraser, much like the [change ( ____) effect by _] (Idea credit to scimonster)
I think that this feature would be useful on multicolor backgrounds where you can not use a white pen. It would be useful in paint programs. IT HAS A SCRATCH SUGGESTIONS PAGE NOW! PLEASE SUPPORT AT
http://suggest.scratch.mit.edu/forums/6 … ser-blocks
What people are saying
roger- wrote:
i think this would be very useful. If you had a single color background, you could just set the color to the background color. this would be very useful with a multicolor background.
aqua101 wrote:
I think that this would be a GREAT feature for scratch 2.0
scimonster wrote:
How about, instead of [eraser up] [eraser down] <eraser down?> [set eraser size to () ] [change eraser size by () ] (eraser size), just use the existing pen blocks, but add a
[set pen to [eraser/pen] ].
But anyways, I'd like to see this implemented, however.
coolstuff wrote:
Yes, the pen blocks are slightly irrelevant without this block. I agree!
But wouldn't it be easier to do as scimonster said and just modify the existing pen toolset?
Harakou wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree.
![]()
Last edited by rocket101 (2011-02-02 08:32:28)
Offline
Offline
How about, instead of [eraser up] [eraser down] <eraser down?> [set eraser size to () ] [change eraser size by () ] (eraser size), just use the existing pen blocks, but add a
[set pen to [eraser/pen] ].
But anyways, I'd like to see this implemented, however.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
Yes, the pen blocks are slightly irrelevant without this block. I agree!
But wouldn't it be easier to do as scimonster said and just modify the existing pen toolset?
Good Idea! Would you like to support this idea on scratch suggestions?
Last edited by rocket101 (2011-01-31 15:53:04)
Offline
Offline
Harakou wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree.
![]()
Would you like to support at http://suggest.scratch.mit.edu/forums/6 … ser-blocks
Offline
rocket101 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree.
![]()
Would you like to support at http://suggest.scratch.mit.edu/forums/6 … ser-blocks
Certainly.
Offline
Offline
Rexpup wrote:
rocket101 wrote:
Bump
Whas that nessasary?
I think you mean:
was that necessary?
but, anyways, this eraser block idea -- basically, it would be like:
there are 3 pen states: pen up, pen down, and erase.
erase uses the same pen size, and you can erase with erase / pen up.
erase basically just does clear, but for a circle/line/oval region, instead of for the whole screen.
it is useful if one wants to draw on something but the background can either change or it is simply not a single color.
Truthfully, most programming languages do not include such an erase statement, however those also do not have a pen layer and a background layer independent of each other.
Offline
Offline
Offline
Very interesting...I support!
Offline