Scratch

sanddude wrote:

Harakou wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Reading up it probably is.
Doesn't look like it supports retina display either.

Why? Do you automatically consider an app that doesn't support the new, higher resolution display to be inferior?

High hive, Harakou! 

How is that a high five

Rhy might

TuffGhost wrote:

sanddude wrote:

Harakou wrote:

Why? Do you automatically consider an app that doesn't support the new, higher resolution display to be inferior?

High hive, Harakou! 

How is that a high five

Rhy might

It's an expression, smart one. 

Harakou wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

agscratcher wrote:

You don't assume, you buffoon.

Reading up it probably is.
Doesn't look like it supports retina display either.

Why? Do you automatically consider an app that doesn't support the new, higher resolution display to be inferior?

For a start, yes.

But mostly that's just one bad point on the list. You need consideration of what the gameplay will be like judging from reviews, the name, screenshots and the description. Looks pretty boring to me.

Take for instance, super monkey ball. That has no retina display but is really fun and is a game I play often.

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Harakou wrote:

Why? Do you automatically consider an app that doesn't support the new, higher resolution display to be inferior?

For a start, yes.
...
Take for instance, super monkey ball. That has no retina display but is really fun and is a game I play often.

You're contradicting yourself...

Super monkey ball is inferior to retina display applications in terms of presentation. However, super monkey ball's content reaches above that, surpassing 2D non retina applications by a large margin.

The app is inferior graphically TO A 3D APP with retina display graphics. Just like a 2D non retina display app is inferior to everything.

3D Retina > 2D Retina/3D Normal > 2D Normal

RHY3756547 wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

For a start, yes.
...
Take for instance, super monkey ball. That has no retina display but is really fun and is a game I play often.

You're contradicting yourself...

Super monkey ball is inferior to retina display applications in terms of presentation. However, super monkey ball's content reaches above that, surpassing 2D non retina applications by a large margin.

The app is inferior graphically TO A 3D APP with retina display graphics. Just like a 2D non retina display app is inferior to everything.

3D Retina > 2D Retina/3D Normal > 2D Normal

To be honest, the resolution isn't that important in my opinion. I guess my opinion is slightly moot, since my iPod doesn't sport the new display, but I value gameplay and other aspects of presenation much more than sheer graphics.

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Harakou wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Super monkey ball is inferior to retina display applications in terms of presentation. However, super monkey ball's content reaches above that, surpassing 2D non retina applications by a large margin.

The app is inferior graphically TO A 3D APP with retina display graphics. Just like a 2D non retina display app is inferior to everything.

3D Retina > 2D Retina/3D Normal > 2D Normal

To be honest, the resolution isn't that important in my opinion. I guess my opinion is slightly moot, since my iPod doesn't sport the new display, but I value gameplay and other aspects of presenation much more than sheer graphics.

Exactly. Like Infinity Blade. It has the best graphics of any iPod/iPhone game ever made, but the gameplay is much worse than I thought it would be.

how many times do i have to say that graphics isn't the only factor before you stop assuming

RHY3756547 wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Harakou wrote:

To be honest, the resolution isn't that important in my opinion. I guess my opinion is slightly moot, since my iPod doesn't sport the new display, but I value gameplay and other aspects of presenation much more than sheer graphics.

Exactly. Like Infinity Blade. It has the best graphics of any iPod/iPhone game ever made, but the gameplay is much worse than I thought it would be.

how many times do i have to say that graphics isn't the only factor before you stop assuming

Since when was I assuming anything?    I just made the comment that graphics are rather unimportant to me, and that I value gameplay much more. I never assumed that you care only about graphics. Where in my post did you get any indication of that?

sanddude wrote:

08jackt wrote:

its not a thing like doodle jump, sanddude.

What? I never said it was!

In fact I said it wasn't once. Shut up, get your facts right, and learn 2nd grade Grammar again.

um. sorry i miss read.
over reaction of the year?

BaVB wrote:

Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:

GlitchSprite wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

TheGameMaster1231 wrote:

BaVB wrote:

kids these days man

just quoting quotes of other kids just quoting quotes of other kids just quoting quotes

Yo dog we heard you like quotes so we put a quote in your quote so you can quote while you quote.