This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#176 2010-10-01 19:52:14

bharvey
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-08-10
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

I don't really have a strong opinion about the age limit (although the parental permission rule does discriminate against us senior citizens  smile  ), but this discussion has brought out other things about which I do have opinions:

1.  (Most important.)  As I've been saying for years, in my role as a teacher, I would benefit tremendously from seeing a set of galleries called "projects by 8-year-olds," "projects by 9-year-olds," etc.  This would give both me and my students a sense of what level of project complexity is typical of kids of a given age.  And what I've been hearing all those years is that it can't be done because the ages of Scratchers is confidential.  But I notice that (a) y'all are perfectly comfortable posting your ages, and (b) the Scratch Team are editing out precise birthdays, but allowing ages to remain.  Oh, and (c) several non-S.T. people seem to think they know each others' ages.  So, can I push for my age gallery idea again?  Of course it would only include projects from people who opt in.

2.  By the way, quite right imho editing out precise birthdays, but I've seen quite a few "birthday card" projects...  (The problem with birthdays isn't anything about child molesters, but about the fact that nothing ever disappears from the Internet and those published birthdays will follow Scratchers into adulthood and identity theft territory.)

3.  A few middle schoolers have expressed the belief, or the hope, that they're going to have less homework in high school.  That isn't the general experience, I think, especially if you go to the kind of high school that loads you up with Advanced Placement courses.  (This isn't a disguised argument for lowering the age; just, again as a teacher, I want people to have realistic expectations about school!)  What you do get in high school, I suppose, is later bedtime to fit it all in.  smile

4.  This discussion pushes one of my buttons, about euphemisms.  I think a significant fraction of the heat in this thread comes from the fact that some of y'all are using the word "experience" as a euphemism for "having already seen pornography" while other people are reading it as, you know, just life experience generally, such as having been to high school.

5.  Just in the interest of accuracy, the COPPA age limit (below which U.S. web sites are restricted in what personal info they can collect, not what they can show, so it's not directly relevant to this discussion anyway) is 13, not 14.


http://cs.berkeley.edu/~bh/sig5.png

Offline

 

#177 2010-10-01 20:28:58

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

bharvey wrote:

5.  Just in the interest of accuracy, the COPPA age limit (below which U.S. web sites are restricted in what personal info they can collect, not what they can show, so it's not directly relevant to this discussion anyway) is 13, not 14.

Eeep, I meant COPA, not COPPA (*facepalm* I am an idiot for mixing the two up); COPA requires websites to block minors for accessing inappropriate content, particularly pornography. COPA is not really in place (it's been a court debate for a long time because there are issues where the act has been questioned about stretching a bit too far, and possibly blocking first amendment rights), but many websites are rather still compliant with COPA (as with COPPA, which is still in place). Despite both of them defining a minor as being under age 13, most websites will bump this up to 14 instead even though theoretically the age restriction can be lowered to 13.

Last edited by cheddargirl (2010-10-01 20:31:48)


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#178 2010-10-01 21:20:12

antimonyarsenide
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-03
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

antimonyarsenide wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

juststickman wrote:

The thing is, if you didn't say your real age, nobody would know...

That is why the Scratch Team now requires parent's permission for those wanting to run - they want to talk to the parents to make sure they [the parents] are okay with their child taking on the role of moderator.

So, the Scratch Team is actually going to call or email our parents or something?  yikes


http://myfastcounter.com/count.php?c_style=75&id=1284314427
No, I'm not back (yet  tongue ), so pretend this is invisible.

Offline

 

#179 2010-10-01 21:23:05

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

antimonyarsenide wrote:

antimonyarsenide wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:


That is why the Scratch Team now requires parent's permission for those wanting to run - they want to talk to the parents to make sure they [the parents] are okay with their child taking on the role of moderator.

So, the Scratch Team is actually going to call or email our parents or something?  yikes

Not sure, I think the original intent was to have the parents contact the Scratch Team should the candidate be elected, although it could be possible being the other way around. Let me flag down a Scratch Team member so we can get a definite answer.  smile


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#180 2010-10-01 21:27:10

militarydudes
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

antimonyarsenide wrote:

antimonyarsenide wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:


That is why the Scratch Team now requires parent's permission for those wanting to run - they want to talk to the parents to make sure they [the parents] are okay with their child taking on the role of moderator.

So, the Scratch Team is actually going to call or email our parents or something?  yikes

Whats wrong with that?


__m. .m__ KILROY WAS HERE
        U

Offline

 

#181 2010-10-01 21:39:33

Penguinsrock
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-11-08
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

*sigh* The second time today I can't be a part of something because I'm too young.  sad


POKEMON & Internets CLICK?
http://internetometer.com/imagesmall/10824.png

Offline

 

#182 2010-10-01 21:51:56

TheSaint
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-11-04
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

bharvey wrote:

I don't really have a strong opinion about the age limit (although the parental permission rule does discriminate against us senior citizens  smile  ), but this discussion has brought out other things about which I do have opinions:

1.  (Most important.)  As I've been saying for years, in my role as a teacher, I would benefit tremendously from seeing a set of galleries called "projects by 8-year-olds," "projects by 9-year-olds," etc.  This would give both me and my students a sense of what level of project complexity is typical of kids of a given age.  And what I've been hearing all those years is that it can't be done because the ages of Scratchers is confidential.  But I notice that (a) y'all are perfectly comfortable posting your ages, and (b) the Scratch Team are editing out precise birthdays, but allowing ages to remain.  Oh, and (c) several non-S.T. people seem to think they know each others' ages.  So, can I push for my age gallery idea again?  Of course it would only include projects from people who opt in.

2.  By the way, quite right imho editing out precise birthdays, but I've seen quite a few "birthday card" projects...  (The problem with birthdays isn't anything about child molesters, but about the fact that nothing ever disappears from the Internet and those published birthdays will follow Scratchers into adulthood and identity theft territory.)

3.  A few middle schoolers have expressed the belief, or the hope, that they're going to have less homework in high school.  That isn't the general experience, I think, especially if you go to the kind of high school that loads you up with Advanced Placement courses.  (This isn't a disguised argument for lowering the age; just, again as a teacher, I want people to have realistic expectations about school!)  What you do get in high school, I suppose, is later bedtime to fit it all in.  smile

4.  This discussion pushes one of my buttons, about euphemisms.  I think a significant fraction of the heat in this thread comes from the fact that some of y'all are using the word "experience" as a euphemism for "having already seen pornography" while other people are reading it as, you know, just life experience generally, such as having been to high school.

5.  Just in the interest of accuracy, the COPPA age limit (below which U.S. web sites are restricted in what personal info they can collect, not what they can show, so it's not directly relevant to this discussion anyway) is 13, not 14.

I like every single point you made.  big_smile

Offline

 

#183 2010-10-01 21:58:14

scratch_yoshi
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

bharvey wrote:

5.  Just in the interest of accuracy, the COPPA age limit (below which U.S. web sites are restricted in what personal info they can collect, not what they can show, so it's not directly relevant to this discussion anyway) is 13, not 14.

Eeep, I meant COPA, not COPPA (*facepalm* I am an idiot for mixing the two up); COPA requires websites to block minors for accessing inappropriate content, particularly pornography. COPA is not really in place (it's been a court debate for a long time because there are issues where the act has been questioned about stretching a bit too far, and possibly blocking first amendment rights), but many websites are rather still compliant with COPA (as with COPPA, which is still in place). Despite both of them defining a minor as being under age 13, most websites will bump this up to 14 instead even though theoretically the age restriction can be lowered to 13.

I lol'd so hard! I thought I'd never see you call yourself an idiot! XD


Retired from Scratch, but just the language itself. Not the forums.

Offline

 

#184 2010-10-01 22:02:03

Paddle2See
Scratch Team
Registered: 2007-10-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

antimonyarsenide wrote:

antimonyarsenide wrote:


So, the Scratch Team is actually going to call or email our parents or something?  yikes

Not sure, I think the original intent was to have the parents contact the Scratch Team should the candidate be elected, although it could be possible being the other way around. Let me flag down a Scratch Team member so we can get a definite answer.  smile

My understanding is the same as yours...if a candidate between the ages of 14 and 17 is elected, they will be asked to have their parent or guardian contact the Scratch Team by phone.  The person setting up the election isn't available for a few days so I can't verify this information but that's what I recall.


http://i39.tinypic.com/2nav6o7.gif

Offline

 

#185 2010-10-01 22:05:09

fg123
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-11-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

So if we get parental permission, and they verify it, but you are too young, we still cant?  sad


Hai.

Offline

 

#186 2010-10-01 22:06:43

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

fg123 wrote:

So if we get parental permission, and they verify it, but you are too young, we still cant?  sad

To my understanding, no, you will not be able to get moderatorship if you are underage even with parental permission.


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#187 2010-10-01 22:08:56

Paddle2See
Scratch Team
Registered: 2007-10-27
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

fg123 wrote:

So if we get parental permission, and they verify it, but you are too young, we still cant?  sad

Sorry, but that is the ruling.  You need to be 14 by the end of October.


http://i39.tinypic.com/2nav6o7.gif

Offline

 

#188 2010-10-01 22:30:34

Lucario621
Community Moderator
Registered: 2007-10-03
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...


http://i.imgur.com/WBkM2QQ.png

Offline

 

#189 2010-10-01 22:35:21

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "there wasn't the public's opinion"?

Last edited by cheddargirl (2010-10-01 22:37:00)


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#190 2010-10-01 22:37:11

scratch_yoshi
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "public's opinion"?

The community's opinion on the subject.


Retired from Scratch, but just the language itself. Not the forums.

Offline

 

#191 2010-10-01 22:37:44

Blade-Edge
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "there wasn't the public's opinion"?

He probably means that you guys made the decision and finalized it before the community could say anything


http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5145/scratchycat.gif CLASSY

Offline

 

#192 2010-10-01 22:37:51

emilypie
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-01-30
Posts: 100+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "public's opinion"?

I think he means, that the scratch team took months deciding an age limit, however we hardly got a say in it. i knew they were going to put an age limit, but i didn't expect it to be so high.  hmm


"Captain Hammer threw a car at my head." -Dr. Horrible

Offline

 

#193 2010-10-01 22:38:50

Blade-Edge
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

This is like a car crash full of ninjas


http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5145/scratchycat.gif CLASSY

Offline

 

#194 2010-10-01 22:40:17

scratch_yoshi
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

Blade-Edge wrote:

This is like a car crash full of ninjas

XD lol


Retired from Scratch, but just the language itself. Not the forums.

Offline

 

#195 2010-10-01 22:40:30

coolstuff
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-03-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "there wasn't the public's opinion"?

The Community. People like Lucario621 weren't asked for their opinion on the matter. Frankly, the Scratch Team are experienced and some of the members are studying communities. This decision was definitely not an easy one to make, but it was made by experienced professionals.

Offline

 

#196 2010-10-01 22:40:41

ScratchReallyROCKS
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

Blade-Edge wrote:

This is like a car crash full of ninjas

No, I don't think it's that dramatic  tongue


http://imageshack.us/a/img694/3806/sigmad.png

Offline

 

#197 2010-10-01 22:44:20

cheddargirl
Scratch Team
Registered: 2008-09-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

Blade-Edge wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

Lucario621 wrote:

To me what's also so harsh is how you guys say you were making this decision for months or something, even though during the time there wasn't the public's opinion...

What do you mean by "there wasn't the public's opinion"?

He probably means that you guys made the decision and finalized it before the community could say anything

Unfortunately, I can't answer for that because it was the Scrath Team who decided upon this rule, not us moderators. But if I had to make an assumption:

To my understanding, the Scratch Team does try to make safety one of the upmost priorities here on the website. My guess is that since this is a safety measure, it becomes more of an issue to be handled only by the Scratch Team rather than have so many young people suddenly try to sway the rule in their favor (since such a thing can be potentially destructive in this case).


http://i.imgur.com/8QRYx.png
Everything is better when you add a little cheddar, because when you have cheese your life is at ease  smile

Offline

 

#198 2010-10-01 22:48:47

Blade-Edge
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

So they didn't even consult the moderators until recently?
I imagine this board room with the lights off, and there are 4 shadowy figures sitting across from each other plotting things
Dun dun dun
It's the Scratch team

Last edited by Blade-Edge (2010-10-01 22:49:15)


http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5145/scratchycat.gif CLASSY

Offline

 

#199 2010-10-01 22:56:29

coolstuff
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-03-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

Blade-Edge wrote:

So they didn't even consult the moderators until recently?
I imagine this board room with the lights off, and there are 4 shadowy figures sitting across from each other plotting things
Dun dun dun
It's the Scratch team

We didn't hear about this until maybe two weeks ago. By that point the decision was pretty much final.

While in certain cases it may be a good idea to consult the community about a plan first, I don't think this would have been one of these times because the community really doesn't know all that much about moderating, the under-14 year old moderators are furious and thus would like to change the rules in their favour, and the over-14 year olds can see some reason to the rule as they are not blinded by anger.

Offline

 

#200 2010-10-01 22:58:27

ScratchReallyROCKS
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: Fall 2010 Community Moderator Elections

cheddargirl wrote:

Blade-Edge wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

What do you mean by "there wasn't the public's opinion"?

He probably means that you guys made the decision and finalized it before the community could say anything

Unfortunately, I can't answer for that because it was the Scrath Team who decided upon this rule, not us moderators. But if I had to make an assumption:

To my understanding, the Scratch Team does try to make safety one of the upmost priorities here on the website. My guess is that since this is a safety measure, it becomes more of an issue to be handled only by the Scratch Team rather than have so many young people suddenly try to sway the rule in their favor (since such a thing can be potentially destructive in this case).

spelling fail  tongue

Last edited by ScratchReallyROCKS (2010-10-01 22:58:59)


http://imageshack.us/a/img694/3806/sigmad.png

Offline

 

Board footer