Scratch

Alright. Wait for it...


I have been on Scratch since 07', because a had a ghost account named 1234test, I think. I deleted it in 08' and forgot about Scratch. In 09' my dad reintroduced me. And right now, my reputation isn't that good. I'm on a quest to fix it, and if it fails, I'll make a new account.

Now, I was what many considered a "spamming, crazy, good-for-nothing,, goofy n00b" in my early days. I've matured, I know how to monitor forums, and I believe I can be a moderator. I wish for your vote for the following reasons:

I'm funny(I think, please say so.) I can be crazy, but i think I'd be a good mod. I'd weed out spam, ban flamefishers*, and I'd answer any question I know that I see. I promise to keep Scratch clean, flame- and spam-free. Anyone imitating anyone else will be banned, if seen appropriate. Even though I was not on very much*, I will be on as much as I can. I will help users and I will accept any tips from former or older mods.

Though my age is minimal, my computer skills make up for it. I have my own email, so I cat get reports, even if I am not on Scratch. I can type fast, so as to zap reports as fast and legible as possible. I am quick to scan, rescan, and look closely at many things. Any sever spam from those who know better will get deleted, and on my watch, they have 3 chances to correct themselves before they get at least an 8-hour ban.

However, those who know no better than spam, a.k.a "newbies", will get 6 chances. At the 6th chance, they will get at least a 6-hour ban. I let them have more leeway because they are new, and know no better.

Now, I know what your thinking, "She just wants an catchy title, and powers over other users, plus she's only nine. She isn't mature enough." But that's not true.

I am nine, but my dad trusted to an email address, right? And I believe the Moderators need fresh blood, someone who can look at it the way the offender, the victim, the bystanders, and those who try and stop the offender. Many moderators on look at two, maybe three positions: The bystanders, the victim, and the ones who try to stop the offender. I can look at many different angles. In the Art vs. Games war of 09, I was on the battlefield, but not fighting. I was neutral. I looked at it from the artists point of view, and the programmers point of view. The artists were famous - Doody, Maskedstar, and many others. The programmers weren't as much - Archmage and a few others. At the breaking point, the programmers had had enough of the artists stealing their fame. They attacked, and thus the war started. The artists didn't know what they had done to them. it died down early the year, but there is still tension. I would be a peacemaker for these wars - I would explain what it was all about.

Now that you have read this long and formal speech, please consider me!

Last edited by shamrocker (2010-09-19 12:55:01)