Scratch

johnnydean1 wrote:

Yes its my mod!

can you give me a link?

Yay! 

Last edited by Daffy22 (2010-10-23 10:43:32)

majormax wrote:

Wow! That's epic!!
I uploaded a BYOB platformer.

nice. 

Billybob-Mario wrote:

Look at Online Slash. You could use something like that to play projects online and make edited versions like Scratch 2.0 for mods. You'd just need to change the .image in the plugin for each mod, and maybe we could get the plugin to be an official plugin on browsers. Also, I will add a link to the Slash website.

could you maybe give me a link?

Daffy22 wrote:

If anyone wants their mod supported and listed in this please let me or LS97 know. 

Could you include Winged

bigreader wrote:

Could you include Zing!? I don't have the Windows version out yet, but it's coming. I'm also planning a new feature related to MODshare coming out in 1.1, but I'm not telling you what it is yet. 

well, for me to include it me and LS97 must approve it and as for the mod share secret; I'd prefer it if you told me in advance. You can email me in private here: daffy22scratch@gmail.com

bump! 

LS97 wrote:

Hmmm... i'm not seeing that much activity on mod share... people obviously prefer scratch to mods then.

But then, what's the use of having so many mods if we wont use them?

good point!! Come on people check out mod share! 

johnnydean1 wrote:

I prefer Scratch for 2 reasons

I loved Scratch at first sight, but since 2009 my students and I are using BYOB. BYOB's power is exactly the same than Scratch's: everything you can do with BYOB (I mean as a final result to the user) you can do with Scratch. But, by using BYOB, programming the solution of a complex project is much more structured and clear.

I would love having in Scratch a lot of the wonderful blocks I see in the MODs, as I would like to give my students the power of doing something even better. But I want to transmit to them the knowledge about a "standard" programming language. So I avoid suggestig them to use MODs as, unfortunately I must say, I don't see much future for most of the wonderful blocks that have been developed for MODs, as the Scratch Team (and I support this view) don't like to put too much into Scratch so that learning it would discourage a real beginner.

That's why I like the extensible view of BYOB (creating new blocks INSIDE Scratch). What I would really like it is a way of extending everything else of Scratch (or BYOB) INSIDE again: the possibility of loading new powerful blocks (like the one developed in Scratch MODs) directly inside Scratch. BYOB's "Elements" (do you know it?) could be a move in the right direction. I think that I would also like a lot a "server approch" like the one made possible by remote sensor connections.

Daffy22 wrote:

s_federici wrote:

johnnydean1 wrote:

I prefer Scratch for 2 reasons

I loved Scratch at first sight, but since 2009 my students and I are using BYOB. BYOB's power is exactly the same than Scratch's: everything you can do with BYOB (I mean as a final result to the user) you can do with Scratch. But, by using BYOB, programming the solution of a complex project is much more structured and clear.

I would love having in Scratch a lot of the wonderful blocks I see in the MODs, as I would like to give my students the power of doing something even better. But I want to transmit to them the knowledge about a "standard" programming language. So I avoid suggestig them to use MODs as, unfortunately I must say, I don't see much future for most of the wonderful blocks that have been developed for MODs, as the Scratch Team (and I support this view) don't like to put too much into Scratch so that learning it would discourage a real beginner.

That's why I like the extensible view of BYOB (creating new blocks INSIDE Scratch). What I would really like it is a way of extending everything else of Scratch (or BYOB) INSIDE again: the possibility of loading new powerful blocks (like the one developed in Scratch MODs) directly inside Scratch. BYOB's "Elements" (do you know it?) could be a move in the right direction. I think that I would also like a lot a "server approch" like the one made possible by remote sensor connections.

I do agree with the idea of been able to make your own blocks instead of using the blocks that already exist. Thats why I would love to see scratch 2.0 with a similar sort of feature to BYOB possibly with the added file I/O blocks too. (write to file ect) 

hey, daffy, why couldnt scratch 2.0 use network blocks instead? that's also something we might develop for mod share. ill talk to youu about it in private later today...

When you get the wrong password, you should make it go to youfail.org.

Check out the new forum smilies! .... http://mod-share.freehostingcloud.com/forum/ - there animated! 

MathWizz wrote:

^ That didn't work...

what didn't work, the smilys?