This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#51 2010-08-29 17:21:28

bbbeb
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

Username.

UnknownPerson posting by accident?

I did the same thing on nuparu.
He was gonna be my person i post games on too!

And look at my Greatest Block Ever!!!


Back in my day.... there were no laws that censored the internet... now, there are.... nah.

Offline

 

#52 2010-08-29 17:28:09

ScratchReallyROCKS
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

bbbeb wrote:

Username.

UnknownPerson posting by accident?

I did the same thing on nuparu.
He was gonna be my person i post games on too!

And look at my Greatest Block Ever!!!

Oh yeah, I remember that.


http://imageshack.us/a/img694/3806/sigmad.png

Offline

 

#53 2010-08-29 17:29:51

bbbeb
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

Im sure you do.  big_smile


Back in my day.... there were no laws that censored the internet... now, there are.... nah.

Offline

 

#54 2010-10-09 10:06:31

TheSuccessor
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-04-23
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

Run self halt as smalltalk and you have a debugger!


/* No comment */

Offline

 

#55 2010-10-09 10:56:44

LS97
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

TheSuccessor wrote:

Run self halt as smalltalk and you have a debugger!

you'd think i'd have blocked that too now, wouldn't you? i have. it is very temptng to actually delete the whole block...

and the password's different in 1.3.0

Offline

 

#56 2010-10-09 11:34:32

TheSuccessor
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-04-23
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

LS97 wrote:

TheSuccessor wrote:

Run self halt as smalltalk and you have a debugger!

you'd think i'd have blocked that too now, wouldn't you? i have. it is very temptng to actually delete the whole block...

and the password's different in 1.3.0

YAY! I can hack it all over again!  tongue


/* No comment */

Offline

 

#57 2010-10-09 11:54:12

Daffy22
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-12-15
Posts: 500+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

I don't get why everyones making such a big deal about hacking Bingo??!!
If you ask me I think it's sad really.  roll


http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1784/logosmalle.png
"Spectacular - 5 Star" -  CNET.com Editor.

Offline

 

#58 2010-10-09 13:10:00

nXIII
Community Moderator
Registered: 2009-04-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

LS97 wrote:

TheSuccessor wrote:

Run self halt as smalltalk and you have a debugger!

you'd think i'd have blocked that too now, wouldn't you? i have. it is very temptng to actually delete the whole block...

and the password's different in 1.3.0

Yea, it's really sad that you care about people "hacking" software which is REQUIRED BY LAW to be open-source. I can't believe that you would so something SPECIFICALLY against the ToS just because you think people care enough to steal your code.

BTW it's impossible to make an un-hackable source without you not being able to use it. ex:
Compiler evaluate: 'ScratchFram','eMorph allInsta','nces fir','st fil','lScr','eenO','ff' for: self logged: false.


nXIII

Offline

 

#59 2010-10-09 14:04:30

LS97
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

nXIII wrote:

LS97 wrote:

TheSuccessor wrote:

Run self halt as smalltalk and you have a debugger!

you'd think i'd have blocked that too now, wouldn't you? i have. it is very temptng to actually delete the whole block...

and the password's different in 1.3.0

Yea, it's really sad that you care about people "hacking" software which is REQUIRED BY LAW to be open-source. I can't believe that you would so something SPECIFICALLY against the ToS just because you think people care enough to steal your code.

BTW it's impossible to make an un-hackable source without you not being able to use it. ex:
Compiler evaluate: 'ScratchFram','eMorph allInsta','nces fir','st fil','lScr','eenO','ff' for: self logged: false.

i know. and i hoped no one would bring it up.

so really, i'm not going against the law. people can easily hack bingo. i even replaced the no hacking dialog in 1.2 with a beep in 1.3. what more? in fact, i'm encouraging people to find new way to hack bingo (therefore accessing the source).

Offline

 

#60 2010-10-09 14:05:31

LS97
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

oh -- by the way.
So that you don't complain about previous versions, i'll explicitly say that the developer's password is
blubber

Offline

 

#61 2010-10-09 16:27:47

johnnydean1
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

*gosh* OMG the pass */gosh*
I hacked the current bingo in my own way not used by anyone else...


You can now reach me on Twitter @johnnydean1_

Offline

 

#62 2010-10-10 04:07:40

LS97
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

johnnydean1 wrote:

*gosh* OMG the pass */gosh*
I hacked the current bingo in my own way not used by anyone else...

and how would that be...? it's probably not there in 1.3.0

Offline

 

#63 2010-10-10 09:38:48

johnnydean1
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-02-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

Look if I tell you, it will get blocked. You see my way is diffrent and is vital to the running of Scratch so...


You can now reach me on Twitter @johnnydean1_

Offline

 

#64 2010-10-10 11:16:42

nXIII
Community Moderator
Registered: 2009-04-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

LS97 wrote:

so really, i'm not going against the law. people can easily hack bingo. i even replaced the no hacking dialog in 1.2 with a beep in 1.3. what more? in fact, i'm encouraging people to find new way to hack bingo (therefore accessing the source).

You still don't get it, do you. If the source code is not INSTANTLY AVAILABLE the MOMENT THE USER DOWNLOADS IT, you're COMPLETELY DISOBEYING the terms of use, and the license you agreed to when downloading it. It is against the law.


nXIII

Offline

 

#65 2010-10-10 12:02:10

bbbeb
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: LS97, pwn'd :D

nXIII wrote:

LS97 wrote:

so really, i'm not going against the law. people can easily hack bingo. i even replaced the no hacking dialog in 1.2 with a beep in 1.3. what more? in fact, i'm encouraging people to find new way to hack bingo (therefore accessing the source).

You still don't get it, do you. If the source code is not INSTANTLY AVAILABLE the MOMENT THE USER DOWNLOADS IT, you're COMPLETELY DISOBEYING the terms of use, and the license you agreed to when downloading it. It is against the law.

1. NXIII's right.
2. Im gonna find a way to hack bingo anyway w.o the run as smalltalk block.


Back in my day.... there were no laws that censored the internet... now, there are.... nah.

Offline

 

Board footer