Scratch

BTW did you just eval Preferences enableProgrammerFacilities?

nXIII wrote:

BTW did you just eval Preferences enableProgrammerFacilities?

whatever mod you're talking about, you can't do that in bingo. at least, not in 1.2.1...

oh and, 700th post 

Last edited by LS97 (2010-08-28 04:55:44)

nXIII wrote:

LS97 wrote:

nXIII wrote:

BTW did you just eval Preferences enableProgrammerFacilities?

whatever mod you're talking about, you can't do that in bingo. at least, not in 1.2.1...

oh and, 700th post 

You can do that, if you use the "run [] as smalltalk" block or whatever.

Nice 

(tries and fails to look at number of posts in the topic review while waiting for the 60 second rule to go away)

EDIT: 1299!    1 away from 1300.... that's kind of like n1300, which is kind of like n13, which is ... you get the point.

nah it doesn't work! It opens up a dialog called run and says "hey, no hacking!",but it was a good idea

I know!!! Other then that it's a good scratch mod.(not better than panther or byob)

nXIII wrote:

But it's not like anyone can take away from the modding world by looking at the sources. 

Ok, I know that, but if someone want's to keep a source code private. They should have not made the mod public

pwiter wrote:

nXIII wrote:

But it's not like anyone can take away from the modding world by looking at the sources. 

Ok, I know that, but if someone want's to keep a source code private. They should have not made the mod public

I agree.
Anyways, keeping the source code private is a direct violation of the ToS.

LS97 wrote:

nXIII wrote:

pwiter wrote:

Ok, I know that, but if someone want's to keep a source code private. They should have not made the mod public

I agree.
Anyways, keeping the source code private is a direct violation of the ToS.

no. i'll relase the password soon after 1.2.1
in fact, 1.2.1 MIGHT be open-source

You don't get it. It has to be open source.

(i think panther did)
And  be the example then!
(I promise i wont steal your blocks.)

bbbeb wrote:

(i think panther did)

Yes, Panther has its own Source folder, and BYOB has a batch file and a shell script for development mode.

LS97 wrote:

bbbeb wrote:

(i think panther did)
And  be the example then!
(I promise i wont steal your blocks.)

1.0.0 was totally open-source. i gave my example. then i looked around and saw that [cough]certain people[/cough] were using my blocks without giving credit. i didnt like that. so without making a big deal of it, i made it semi-closed-source. end of matter 

Oh.
Then.
Make.
It.
So that.
All The Blocks.
Have a Special Function.
Then make it open-source.
So that they have to figure it out.
That works!

LS97 wrote:

nXIII wrote:

LS97 wrote:

no. i'll relase the password soon after 1.2.1
in fact, 1.2.1 MIGHT be open-source

You don't get it. It has to be open source.

ok, sorry, i phrased that prett badly. what i meant was:
1.2.1 might be directly open-source without stagger 
and i'm not stupid. i know:

license wrote:

you must make the source code for derivative works available.

but then again, neither BYOB nor Panther respected those ToU.

You can't stagger it. It's against the ToS.
Panther is open-source, what are you talking about? So is BYOB.

A simple thing that said that i hacked bingo turned into a source code discussion!!