Scratch

sparks wrote:

zorket wrote:

Well, since you're not adding a SINGLE block i'm giving you, i'll stop.

Zorket! I posted above yesterday saying I CAN'T add any new blocks right now! I have some bad, costly internet (I'm paying to write this) on my phone and i have neither the time nor the money to update it on here without copy and paste. So yes, i'm not adding your blocks, but I'm currently not adding anyone's. Just a little patience?

Fine.
I have a list of blocks:
<true> and <false>
the one you didn't accept: <if <> then <> else <>
remix of (get (): (get (^)
New! () + () + () + () + ()

blockspec:

('%n + %n + %n + %n + %n' #r #addOne:two:three:four:five:)

addOne: t1 two: t2 three: t3 four: t4 five: t5
^ t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t5

These are the blocks I made you didn't add. I'll let you take your time now.

Hey, this is my 200th post! :p

Last edited by zorket (2010-10-04 16:54:25)

nXIII wrote:

A different solution to the join [] < > block:
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qu3s55.jpg

wow.

SSBBM wrote:

I got some more!

Lol. Like it.

Last edited by TheSuccessor (2010-10-05 14:25:29)

midnightleopard wrote:

nXIII, your block requires other BYOB blocks right?

Well, just one:

all but first of (list)
script vars (a)
set [a] to (copy of (list))
delete (1) of (a)
report (a)

Last edited by nXIII (2010-10-05 17:39:50)

midnightleopard wrote:

nXIII wrote:

midnightleopard wrote:

nXIII, your block requires other BYOB blocks right?

Well, just one:

all but first of (list)
script vars (a)
set [a] to (copy of (list))
delete (1) of (a)
report (a)

yeah but what is that (join >) block you've got there at the bottom of your code?

The same block! It uses recursion. 

nXIII wrote:

midnightleopard wrote:

nXIII wrote:

Well, just one:

all but first of (list)
script vars (a)
set [a] to (copy of (list))
delete (1) of (a)
report (a)

yeah but what is that (join >) block you've got there at the bottom of your code?

The same block! It uses recursion. 

You know, you don't have to use (the (join >) block) in the call block, you could just use (join >)

nXIII wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

nXIII wrote:

The same block! It uses recursion. 

You know, you don't have to use (the (join >) block) in the call block, you could just use (join >)

?
I need to call it with a list of arguments!

No, I mean don't need to use the (the () block) block.

midnightleopard wrote:

okay but how do you put a block you're making in it's own coding?

You drag it in.

This is awesome!

sparks wrote:

Odd, some people are saying that Zorket is not the author of the Scratch block "get time" and that someone else did it... anyone know who to credit?

I thought LS97 made it.

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

nXIII wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

You know, you don't have to use (the (join >) block) in the call block, you could just use (join >)

?
I need to call it with a list of arguments!

No, I mean don't need to use the (the () block) block.

You mean I could just use an OSlot (gray border)? I don't like that shortcut, (the () block) is short enough for me (it's a shortening of (the script (report ())))

nXIII wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

nXIII wrote:

?
I need to call it with a list of arguments!

No, I mean don't need to use the (the () block) block.

You mean I could just use an OSlot (gray border)? I don't like that shortcut, (the () block) is short enough for me (it's a shortening of (the script (report ())))

Yeah. Why don't you like it?