Scratch

littletonkslover wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Burn more fossil fuels so us british can get warmer summers! Drown the polar bears!

Wow, stop being a jerk. It's not even funny RHY.

You shut up.

Just because it would be one less thing for you to draw somewhat badly and call it a masterpiece.

Oh, and did I mention? It was a JOKE

J
O
K
E

JOKE

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/joke

What, is this the 5th time?

nikkiperson2 wrote:

RHY3756547 wrote:

Burn more fossil fuels so us british can get warmer summers! Drown the polar bears!

As the wise Sasha Baron Cohen once put it;
"High five!"

Maybe the polar bears shouldn't live on ice. Ever hear of survival of the fittest? Obviously they aren't fit to survive.

I'm selfish.

I completely agree.

Last edited by RHY3756547 (2010-03-21 07:56:15)

Wolfie1996 wrote:

steppenwulf wrote:

Paradox wrote:

Nothing like a good ol' polar bear sandwich while riding on the back of an SUV on a field of flowers

Mmm polar bear sammich x3

Just don't eat the liver, children    That could kill you. Other than that: *sammich* 

Back to the topic:

You realise the most harmful greenhouse gas is water vapour (clouds). And that occurs from the sea evaporating. We can't get rid of the sea - as much as I'd like to walk to France, draining the sea wouldn't be practical    Where would you put the excess water, anyway?

And Carbon Dioxide - rainforests produce A LOT of that a night (due to the lack of sunlight and some other stuff I don't understand 100%)

Another greenhouse gas is methane. And the main producers of that are bovine species (cows, wildebeast, etc). And the only way we can stop them is... well... making THEM extinct. Would you do that to millions of animals, for the sake of some animals that are failing to adapt to the climate?

While I agree that something has to be done about climate change, we have to accept that there are things that are way out of our control. 

Yes. It's not completely us to blame. You should all stop blaming yourselves.

The earth is sloowly moving closer to the sun anyways.

Also, people are overreacting. If you're so worried about these things, then why don't you give everyone in your neighborhood a solar panel?

Speaking of giving people stuff, Google gave a town 1 FREAKING GB PER SECOND INTERNET and it kind of ticks me off. I have what, 700kb? It seems like it when I download stuff because every second I download 700kb.

If we abandon fossil fuels and use nuclear energy, the world's problems will be solved.


Think of it this way:

1 ton of uranium can produce more energy than:

500 square miles of solar panels - for a week
40 trainloads of coal - every day
200 truckloads of oil - every day
300 wind turbines - blowing 50mph for twelve days
8 Hoover Dams

And it is refueled yearly.

Take a close look at this:



Smoke? NO! Its steam, which will evaporate into the clouds, condense, rain down, and feed our lovely crops. 

Last edited by illusionist (2010-03-21 09:12:03)

Nuclear power = more problems

It's very dangerous, it has radiation and quite a few other problems.

BWOG wrote:

Nuclear power = more problems

It's very dangerous, it has radiation and quite a few other problems.

FAIL

The Soviets scared people away from it when they used a ridiculously dangerous method of harnessing the power.

That method is now illegal, and was NEVER used by the U.S.

Modern American plants have NEVER had any accidents.

It is only radioactive if you are stupid enough to touch raw uranium. 

...and that could never happen, because when they are done being used, they are contained in underground facilities where they will rest in peace for eternity.

Last edited by illusionist (2010-03-21 09:17:37)

fg123 wrote:

Don't try to save your earth. Either it:
dies of global warming
crashes into sun
MRN or 08jackt raids it

So, either ways, it's doomed.

Not neccasarily.

Recently I read a book about the universe. It had a chapter on several different ways the Earth could die. If we were technologically advanced enough by the time the sun expanded into a red giant, then we might be able to "slingshot" earth away from the sun and find a safer distance. Then when the sun collapses into white dwarf, we could either use the slingshot method again, or we could use our amazing technology to move the earth to another star, such as Alpha Centauri.

But in the meantime, we might as well conserve our energy. There's actually a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Car in Britain that looks and acts just like a normal car - Except it runs on water. It extracts the hydrogen from the water (H2O) and runs on that, and the only emission is oxygen. And the reason this car is supposed to be our salvation is that it is just like the cars of today - meaning we don't have to change our ways to fit around the new type of car.

Paradox wrote:

What if we get a space cannon and make hollow cannonballs out of garbage (recycling!) Then we fill them with excess water and launch them into space and let the martians deal with it 

Thats not recycling because we don't get to use it again. 

BWOG wrote:

Nuclear power = more problems

It's very dangerous, it has radiation and quite a few other problems.

Chernobyl was completely the workers' fault. They were testing a way of extracting power from the uranium that had never been tried before, and they paid the consequences for it.

illusionist wrote:

Take a close look at this:

http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_book … -plant.jpg

Smoke? NO! Its steam, which will evaporate into the clouds, condense, rain down, and feed our lovely crops. 

But I don't like it raining, because then it's cloudy at night then I can't see the stars.

But during the morning I'm fine with rain.

illusionist wrote:

Paradox wrote:

What if we get a space cannon and make hollow cannonballs out of garbage (recycling!) Then we fill them with excess water and launch them into space and let the martians deal with it 

Thats not recycling because we don't get to use it again. 

Then it's re using!

You guys are missing one crucial thing; Sure we could give up technology and stop using cars, but would you want to actually do that? We need technology.

Musicstar888 wrote:

Don't you agree we should STOP pollution? people are starting to slow down on these protection things when we're supposed to speed up!     Doesn't anyone care anymore about  species that live in the arctic? Imagine these penguins and polar bears! Another thing we haven't stopped doing is make houses over rainforest. These animals have no other home, and endangered species will shrink population even more if we don't stop. DON'T ALL OF YOU THINK WE SHOULD PUT A STOP TO THIS??! Reply if you agree!

I watched a documentary on Global Warming the other day/year, and funny thing...
IT'S NOT ENTIRELY OUR FAULT!
The world is warming up as part of the course of nature. Sure, we're speeding it up, but it's not entirely our fault. The ice would melt anyways. And FYI, Antartica isn't melting that much, and that's where penguins live. So really, it's Polar bears we should be caring about.

I agree with what you're saying, but I think you should be a bit more informed. And now you are