Scratch

Brass45 wrote:

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

The answer to that question is very simple. Tell him, TheSaint 

Isn't it that atoms of roughly similar electromagnitism attract each other(if not,then blame wikipedia).By the way,remind samurai to add me to the participants list.

I know what the answer is, or I did at one point. I'm not in the mood to refresh my memory of Chemistry. God knows why I took Grade 12 Chemistry after I didn't like Grade 11 that much.

Brass45 wrote:

Okay...did I get it right?I'm only in the 6th grade,and right now we're taking biology in science,so i'm not sure.Also,for Samurai,do I need to answer all those questions in my project,or do I need to upload a working demonstration of my idea,or both?I uploaded a project to my test account,but it's pretty much just a slideshow on how my invention works and what it does.

Those questions were just to help you get an idea what would be judged. It has to be a working demonstation, and if you want to do blueprints and an ad, you get 10 points extra in each catagory (5 for blueprints and 5 for ad) I really hope this wasn't too confusing 

EDIT: I don't mean by working model that it actually is a model, but more like a simulation of what it will do.

PS: I'm in 6th grade too!

Last edited by samurai768 (2010-02-06 23:30:38)

fanofcena wrote:

Um most ideas up here are im practical though i will make a walking humanoid (whic i already made i would just hav to make an intrfrnc b/w it and scratch HMM WEE DOO)

Do you mean impractical to make or impractical in usage?(mine definitly couldn't be made right now,but it has man applications)

samurai768 wrote:

poopo wrote:

ill enter when is this project due

Read the first post.

ok ill start working

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Impractical to make, probably. For example, why would you need to spend 3 million dollars on a butt scratching laser from space, when you could just buy yourself a 20$ butt scratcher?

That's something that's impractical in usage;impractical to make means that it takes more effort to get the machine working then the payoff is worth,while impractical in usage means that it does not do a vital task or something already does the task just as well.
Also,I made two projects for the contest:
My Actual Simulation
An Informational Flipbook on How the Nanobot Works

I didn't remix that project,though.

Last edited by Brass45 (2010-02-07 10:04:16)

i would invent a LAZAH! BWAAAAAAHHH!!!!!!!!!!

I would invent a machine that makes everything edible and taste like cake or whatever you want it too
Then a homeless person finds a shoe and the machine zaps it and it becomes shoecake.
Mmmmm shoecake *drools*

Mr_X wrote:

I would invent a machine that makes everything edible and taste like cake or whatever you want it too
Then a homeless person finds a shoe and the machine zaps it and it becomes shoecake.
Mmmmm shoecake *drools*

The shoecake is a lie.

Food-Dude, please edit your posts instead of double posting. Thank you.

Brass, molecules form when the highest level electrons move up and bond with ones in the next atom.  This causes the atoms to become much more stable, which they want. However, while electrons are shared, the atoms are together. My point was you were think of the like a ball, which they are definatly not. Electrons don't even have circular orbits.

One last thing: The average nitrogen molecule in the atmosphere moves at approximatly 490 m/s. Good luck catching it. 

Nice idea though.

TheSaint wrote:

Brass, molecules form when the highest level electrons move up and bond with ones in the next atom.  This causes the atoms to become much more stable, which they want. However, while electrons are shared, the atoms are together. My point was you were think of the like a ball, which they are definatly not. Electrons don't even have circular orbits.

One last thing: The average nitrogen molecule in the atmosphere moves at approximatly 490 m/s. Good luck catching it. 

Nice idea though.

Thanks,I guess.So if I applied my nanobot to catch the atoms in my way,then it would probably end up as part of the nanobot. Couldn't you catch atoms with electromagnetism though? But then their would be the problem of keeping the atom stable without flying toward or away from the magnet;if the atom was spinning though,then the gyroscopic stability might keep it in place.

I'll judge the competition.