Scratch

littletonkslover · 2010-01-25 20:22:18

lonwol wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
lonwol wrote:
How could the vikings lose?!?!?!? DANGIT PETERSON! WAY TO RUIN EVERYTHING!
Now, let's not blame the total fumbler.
True. Favre should have run the ball, and then MAYBE we would have won.

He was beat up though. I felt really bad for him.

The-Whiz · 2010-01-25 20:22:32

I watched the game... The vikings should have won, but those fumbles... I'm a vikings fan, I used to live in Minnesota. Way up North.

lonwol · 2010-01-25 20:23:33

I live by minneapolis. Pretty close to the MOA

adriangl · 2010-01-25 20:32:26

Colts are so going to beat the Saints...I want them to. I so wanted the Vikings to win sad

And my favorite team are the 49ers. Towards the end of the season, they were the best defensive team smile

The-Whiz · 2010-01-25 20:34:11

adriangl wrote:
Colts are so going to beat the Saints...I want them to. I so wanted the Vikings to win

And my favorite team are the 49ers. Towards the end of the season, they were the best defensive team

I want Colts to win too.

adriangl · 2010-01-25 20:38:36

The-Whiz wrote:
adriangl wrote:
Colts are so going to beat the Saints...I want them to. I so wanted the Vikings to win

And my favorite team are the 49ers. Towards the end of the season, they were the best defensive team
I want Colts to win too.

Woohoo! Everyone at my school was rooting for the Saints. Finally, a smart person tongue

lonwol · 2010-01-25 20:49:10

adriangl wrote:
The-Whiz wrote:
adriangl wrote:
Colts are so going to beat the Saints...I want them to. I so wanted the Vikings to win

And my favorite team are the 49ers. Towards the end of the season, they were the best defensive team
I want Colts to win too.
Woohoo! Everyone at my school was rooting for the Saints. Finally, a smart person

Lets go colts! DO IT FOR FAVRE!

cocoanut · 2010-01-25 22:57:20

littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
Everyone at school was depressed about it.
*giggles*
FALCCCOOOOON-PUNCH!

LOLxD

http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related

Last edited by cocoanut (2010-01-25 23:01:08)

ScratchX · 2010-01-25 23:16:18

cocoanut wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:

*giggles*
FALCCCOOOOON-PUNCH!
LOLxD
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_49zD1920NgE/S … Stylez.jpg

http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/ … re=related

C-C-C-Combo BREAKER!

Louis2018 · 2010-01-26 07:49:39

I wanted the vikings to win

soupoftomato · 2010-01-26 08:37:11

RHY3756547 wrote:
I don't like watching any sports game. Quit whining. XD

Up top!

steppenwulf · 2010-01-26 10:20:53

Really all I wanted was the Colts to win. I didn't really care about the outcome of the Saints/Vikings game because I like both teams. But I wanted the Vikings to go more. D:

lonwol · 2010-01-26 12:04:25

steppenwulf wrote:
Really all I wanted was the Colts to win. I didn't really care about the outcome of the Saints/Vikings game because I like both teams. But I wanted the Vikings to go more. D:

I wanted the jets to win, and the vikings to win, so the vikings could kick their... butt

Mr_X · 2010-01-26 13:45:21

Vikings stink

Last edited by Mr_X (2010-01-26 13:46:15)

littletonkslover · 2010-01-26 16:09:49

Mr_X wrote:
Vikings stink

Screw that quote!

And yah, then MN could get a 2nd try at beating the Yankees....er, New York teams.......

skolvikings · 2010-01-26 16:31:16

littletonkslover wrote:
Noooooooooo!!!!!!

The Minnesota Vikings lost their ticket to the superbowl against New Orleans last night. Basically, every Minnesotan was watching the match, but the Vikes got one(or 6) too many fumbles. Well, we probably won't be back for a while.

And Brett Farve is probably gonna retire. D: Yesterday, he was beaten up SO HARD. I felt really bad for that 40-year-old. He was getting smacked, smashed, and thrown. Yup.

Discuss this madness.

It sucks the vikings were so close to winning the NFC championship I am a huge fan of the vikings

skolvikings · 2010-01-26 16:34:39

littletonkslover wrote:
lonwol wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:

Now, let's not blame the total fumbler.
True. Favre should have run the ball, and then MAYBE we would have won.
He was beat up though. I felt really bad for him.

They should have put in Jackson instead of Favre (after Favre got hurt of course)
Favre threw the interception at the end then in overtime it was like sudden death.

skolvikings · 2010-01-26 16:36:31

littletonkslover wrote:
Mr_X wrote:
Vikings stink
Screw that quote!

And yah, then MN could get a 2nd try at beating the Yankees....er, New York teams.......

The vikings could come back next year (not likely)

Lord-Sprites · 2010-01-26 16:46:56

I believe Mr_X was referring to these vikings

gettysburg11 · 2010-01-26 16:57:24

Sorry, but I was rooting for the Saints. big_smile

ScratchX · 2010-01-26 16:58:11

gettysburg11 wrote:
Sorry, but I was rooting for the Saints.

4311 YEAH!

gettysburg11 · 2010-01-26 16:59:31

I really like Brees. He's a great quarterback, and unless you're from Indiana and the surrounding area, you're probably rooting for Nawlins because of what that city has gone through

littletonkslover · 2010-01-26 17:05:08

gettysburg11 wrote:
I really like Brees. He's a great quarterback, and unless you're from Indiana and the surrounding area, you're probably rooting for Nawlins because of what that city has gone through

Farve is epic.

I think enough has been said.

floatingmagictree · 2010-01-26 17:08:11

littletonkslover wrote:
gettysburg11 wrote:
I really like Brees. He's a great quarterback, and unless you're from Indiana and the surrounding area, you're probably rooting for Nawlins because of what that city has gone through
Farve is epic.

I think enough has been said.

You spelled his name wrong. What a great Vikings fan you are.

gettysburg11 · 2010-01-26 17:12:46

OH SHNAP!

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2010-01-25 20:22:18

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

lonwol wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

lonwol wrote:

#27 2010-01-25 20:22:32

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#28 2010-01-25 20:23:33

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#29 2010-01-25 20:32:26

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#30 2010-01-25 20:34:11

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

adriangl wrote:

#31 2010-01-25 20:38:36

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

The-Whiz wrote:

adriangl wrote:

#32 2010-01-25 20:49:10

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

adriangl wrote:

The-Whiz wrote:

adriangl wrote:

#33 2010-01-25 22:57:20

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#34 2010-01-25 23:16:18

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

cocoanut wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

illusionist wrote:

#35 2010-01-26 07:49:39

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#36 2010-01-26 08:37:11

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

RHY3756547 wrote:

#37 2010-01-26 10:20:53

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#38 2010-01-26 12:04:25

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

steppenwulf wrote:

#39 2010-01-26 13:45:21

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#40 2010-01-26 16:09:49

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

Mr_X wrote:

#41 2010-01-26 16:31:16

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

littletonkslover wrote:

#42 2010-01-26 16:34:39

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

littletonkslover wrote:

lonwol wrote:

littletonkslover wrote:

#43 2010-01-26 16:36:31

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

littletonkslover wrote:

Mr_X wrote:

#44 2010-01-26 16:46:56

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#45 2010-01-26 16:57:24

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#46 2010-01-26 16:58:11

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

gettysburg11 wrote:

#47 2010-01-26 16:59:31

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

#48 2010-01-26 17:05:08

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

gettysburg11 wrote:

#49 2010-01-26 17:08:11

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬

littletonkslover wrote:

gettysburg11 wrote:

#50 2010-01-26 17:12:46

Re: Nice Going, Saints. ¬¬