Only 3/16 people in here have a post count that's less than mine. I'm gonna have to up the ante and post 75 per day starting from now on. In fact, this is today's 75th.
Offline
technoguyx wrote:
This must be the 2nd longest topic post, 347 lines.
![]()
Nice info, maybe this will be stickied when the moderators see it.
Actually, I made a larger one called the almighty scrationary.
Offline
technoguyx wrote:
This must be the 2nd longest topic post, 347 lines.
![]()
Nice info, maybe this will be stickied when the moderators see it.
Why were you counting the lines?
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Only 3/16 people in here have a post count that's less than mine. I'm gonna have to up the ante and post 75 per day starting from now on. In fact, this is today's 75th.
Ace... why are you trying to get a high post count intentionally and as fast as possible? That's not fair on the people who work their way up normally (like me).
75 posts a day... you'll beat Float soon (mind you, Float has over 5000 posts).
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
technoguyx wrote:
This must be the 2nd longest topic post, 347 lines.
![]()
Nice info, maybe this will be stickied when the moderators see it.Why were you counting the lines?
To compare it with the records.
Offline
Jonathanpb wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Only 3/16 people in here have a post count that's less than mine. I'm gonna have to up the ante and post 75 per day starting from now on. In fact, this is today's 75th.
Ace... why are you trying to get a high post count intentionally and as fast as possible? That's not fair on the people who work their way up normally (like me).
![]()
75 posts a day... you'll beat Float soon (mind you, Float has over 5000 posts).![]()
How's it not fair? I don't just reply everywhere, only where it's relevant. And it evens out to exactly 50 or 75 per day for some reason.
Offline
This topic's pretty mate. :3 Really, really pretty.
Offline
How long did it take to type?
By the way, 50th post or 75th post for yesterday. I'm not sure which one it is.
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
How long did it take to type?
I worked on it on and off for a week.
08jackt wrote:
how about an Operating Systems Chapter?
It's a nice idea, but it's not really a chapter that belongs in an almanac... I could try making a section in the 2011 release that lists some future projects.
Offline
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Jonathanpb wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Only 3/16 people in here have a post count that's less than mine. I'm gonna have to up the ante and post 75 per day starting from now on. In fact, this is today's 75th.
Ace... why are you trying to get a high post count intentionally and as fast as possible? That's not fair on the people who work their way up normally (like me).
![]()
75 posts a day... you'll beat Float soon (mind you, Float has over 5000 posts).![]()
How's it not fair? I don't just reply everywhere, only where it's relevant. And it evens out to exactly 50 or 75 per day for some reason.
I'll put it like this:
Person 1: Posts 5 - 10 times a day, builds a nice post count over time (say, a year)
Person 2: Posts 50 - 75 times a day, builds a nice post count in a month
Which way would be more satisfying for getting a nice post count? When you do it normally, you feel more proud - and it's more special, as you didn't have to try for it. But when you try and get a high post count intentially and as fast as possible, it isn't as special.
When I said that it wasn't fair, that was a joke. Anyway, I'll explain: People like me work their way up slowly and normally, while others try and work their way up as fast as possible. Which group do you think deserves it more? The group that didn't cheat, of course.
Last edited by Jonathanpb (2010-02-05 01:13:50)
Offline
Jonathanpb wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Jonathanpb wrote:
Ace... why are you trying to get a high post count intentionally and as fast as possible? That's not fair on the people who work their way up normally (like me).![]()
75 posts a day... you'll beat Float soon (mind you, Float has over 5000 posts).![]()
How's it not fair? I don't just reply everywhere, only where it's relevant. And it evens out to exactly 50 or 75 per day for some reason.
I'll put it like this:
Person 1: Posts 5 - 10 times a day, builds a nice post count over time (say, a year)
Person 2: Posts 50 - 75 times a day, builds a nice post count in a month
Which way would be more satisfying for getting a nice post count? When you do it normally, you feel more proud - and it's more special, as you didn't have to try for it. But when you try and get a high post count intentially and as fast as possible, it isn't as special.
When I said that it wasn't fair, that was a joke. Anyway, I'll explain: People like me work their way up slowly and normally, while others try and work their way up as fast as possible. Which group do you think deserves it more? The group that didn't cheat, of course.
Me and Chris post normally, but our "normal" is quite high. xD
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
You're talking about the TBG, Vista...
![]()
Exactly...!
Offline
I don't really try though. Just like posting.
Offline
Posting's fun...
Now let's get back on topic.
Is anyone looking forward to the 2011 release?
Offline
Yes, because I'll be in it.
Offline