No. Its night at this point (EST) and of course there is Daylight Savings Time, so he's probably in bed, and I will too soon. Anyway we first have to decide WHICH moods to have. I'll start it off.
Normal - Generally happy.
Angry - Kind of grumpy, something must have ruined his day.
Sad - A little dissapointed, and looking for somebody to cheer him up.
Tired/Sleepy - Not in a huge talking mood, is not totally enthusiastic, but not angry.
Last edited by Lucario621 (2009-11-05 17:15:32)
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
No. Its night at this point (EST) and of course there is Daylight Savings Time, so he's probably in bed, and I will too soon. Anyway we first have to decide WHICH moods to have. I'll start it off.
Normal - Generally happy.
Angry - Kind of grumpy, something must have ruined his day.
Tired/Sleepy - Not in a huge talking mood, is not totally enthusiastic, but not angry.
How about sad?
Offline
What should I do if there's so much conflict with the menuz?
Offline
Ok guys I uploaded a new version, in which the way it resolves the problem that what you say is not one of the phrases list of commands (where it says What? or I don't understand what you're saying...), so the script is a bit shorter, and it doesn't use the deletelast? variable at all. Instead, if it doesn't find it, it sets the iterator to 0, and find to [unknown responses], and within the words and replies list, near the end it has an unknown resposes section where it has the phrases such as (What? and I don't understand what your saying... and Sorry I didn't catch that, can you say that again?). IMO its more efficient.
Offline
adriangl wrote:
Okay, so latest version is fine now lets start trying to make the cat respond faster because right now it is way too slow.
We can use RHY357......'s technique called 'interleafing'. He says that the repeat block takes up 1/40th of a second, and considering the length of the list is about 140, that can add up to 3.5 seconds total for just using the repeat block, and pile up more when we add more commands. Interleafing, basically duplicates the script, so that can be made to 1/8 of the time, for about half a second, in the 140 length of Words & Replies. So I'll quickly add that and see how that works.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
What do you mean theres lots of 'conflict'?
Conflict as in:
"We should have a menu"
"We shouldn't"
etc.
Make your minds up. D:
Offline
RHY3756547 wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
What do you mean theres lots of 'conflict'?
Conflict as in:
"We should have a menu"
"We shouldn't"
etc.
Make your minds up. D:
No menu, that was decided(by me), but you should start working on what we have for now.
Offline
adriangl wrote:
RHY3756547 wrote:
Lucario621 wrote:
What do you mean theres lots of 'conflict'?
Conflict as in:
"We should have a menu"
"We shouldn't"
etc.
Make your minds up. D:No menu, that was decided(by me), but you should start working on what we have for now.
Stupid republicans don't want to 'vote democratically' *stubborn*
Anyway I got the interleafing done, so I'll upload it. Right now theres quite a bit of difference, but not something you'll say "WOWZERZ THATS FAST", but as we work on this more and more, it will be noticably faster. To do this, you take the main script, put it in this if block, and duplicate it a ton of times, and insert it into the script.
But in general thats the only thing that we can do to make things faster, unless anybody else has some ideas. There are more places that you can interleaf at, but generally, we don't have to do it. We'll do that as our last resort...
Last edited by Lucario621 (2009-11-05 18:05:58)
Offline
Ok uploaded. And just a quick FYI, in 0.4.6 I actually added some more phrase to complementary and deregatory, so that was nice.
Offline
In conclusion, the only method of reducing lag is one of the steps that is required to be added at the end, so we should work on something else.
Offline
Lanie wrote:
Good luck adrian ^_^ send me a link or notify me when the full version is done
Hi! Long time no see
Offline
Lanie wrote:
Good luck adrian ^_^ send me a link or notify me when the full version is done
Thanks and I surely will. Where have you been? Busy with high school?
Anyways, I just uploaded one with a drop down menu to select the background that the user wants, but I didn't finish. Anyone feel free to do that because I am to lazy
Last edited by adriangl (2009-11-05 18:28:36)
Offline
I don't think we need a drop-down menu, because there aren't many backgrounds.
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
I don't think we need a drop-down menu, because there aren't many backgrounds.
We'll see. If we can do it without interfering with the rest of the stuff, then let's try. Otherwise we will go back to the regular way.
Offline
I'll work on it. But I noticed that you completely simplified the clicking script - don't. I'll build off of mine, by looking at yours, to create it. And I don't like the ghost effect thing.
I'm just saying, that you're being a bit crazy - a drop down menu for 3 backgrounds but not a menu. Really >.>
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
I'll work on it. But I noticed that you completely simplified the clicking script - don't. I'll build off of mine, by looking at yours, to create it. And I don't like the ghost effect thing.
I'm just saying, that you're being a bit crazy - a drop down menu for 3 backgrounds but not a menu. Really >.>
There is the fact with ease we can add more backgrounds and it is just an idea-trying it out to see how it looks is what we'll do and see.
Offline
Hmm I'm working on it, and it's looking pretty good! You'll like it, I'm sure
Offline
big-bang wrote:
If this passes the Turing test, I will find the best computer institute for you guys to laugh in the faces of.
I know, I can't wait to rub this into the faces of the students at Cal-Tech!
Offline