Here's an idea...create rankings for Scratch users based on how many LoveIts they have each received on all of their projects combined. Upon reaching certain amounts of LoveIts, their rank increases. This could be an effective way to determine who has contributed the most to Scratch, since people generally love the best projects. For example, one person could have 17 LoveIts on one project, 38 on another, and 53 on a third. This totals 108 LoveIts, which would be their user score. Or, award points for each project's views, LoveIts, and downloads.
This is how I would work it:
Each view: 2 pts. This means the project's eye-catching.
Each LoveIt: 5 pts. It really needs to be good to get a LoveIt.
Each download: 3 pts. Downloading it and possibly saving to a computer really says something about that person's opinion of the game, but it could be that the game only works if downloaded.
In all, each Scratcher can give each project 10 pts. Now, the rating for each player is the combined score received on each of the user's projects. Ranks should be determined by the point totals received.
Normal Rank: 0-999 points
Bronze Rank: 1,000-2,999 points
Silver Rank: 3,000-4,999 points
Gold Rank: 5,000-7,499 points
Platinum Rank: 7,500-9,999 points
Elite Rank: 10,000+ points
Basically, the point levels are set high to separate the game players from the game makers. Those who develop more and better games will earn more points, and therefore have higher scores. Finally, a section of the Scratch website should be dedicated to higher-ranked designers' games. This would allow people who like to play games easily seek out the best Scratchers and see their fabulous creations.
Scratch Team, I'm talking to you!
[blocks]<say[Respond with your feedback!]for(Please!)secs>[/blocks]
Offline
I don't know about a separate website for better users. Seems kinda unfair to new users.
It would be neat to see more user statistics though.
Offline
it sounds like a cool idea, why not build on it by saying that instead of making a separate website they just have a little area in projects for elite, gold, bronze, silver, platinum...etc
Offline
yah thats a good idea, they could give you the option to get like a different colour on ur my projects page. thats right i spell it colour because im canadian!
Offline
Wow, this is a good idea, they could have a highest ranking user ever page and it would be a popularity measure so people could set goals for themselves. I think this would be a great addition to the scratch site, it might make users a bit more competitive though.
Offline
kgordon wrote:
Wow, this is a good idea, they could have a highest ranking user ever page and it would be a popularity measure so people could set goals for themselves. I think this would be a great addition to the scratch site, it might make users a bit more competitive though.
You're right, but some site that have forums do something like that. They include points for how kind and helpful a user has been, and is degraded if they are rude
Offline
an excellent idea!
It should be a view-to-love-it ratio though, so if 20 people love-it, but it has 1000 views, it would mean that the project looks good, but actually isn't good. This would make it so if 5 people have seen it, but they all love-it it would indicate that the project is good.
Offline
I think it's a nice idea, but wouldn't it result in competition, showing off, bragging, etc.? I get the feeling that the users who would obtain the Elite Rank would support this idea, but many of the newer users would disagree.
But a good idea anyway.
Last edited by Chrischb (2009-06-23 01:46:13)
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
I think it's a nice idea, but wouldn't it result in competition, showing off, bragging, etc.?
Don't forget the cheaters. Members creating other accounts to give their projects views/love-its/downloads. That already happens even without this system -_-'
Offline
archmage wrote:
I don't know about a separate website for better users. Seems kinda unfair to new users.
It would be neat to see more user statistics though.
I didn't say anything about a separate website, I mentioned a separate section of the website. Where they have the home, projects, galleries, support, etc. sections, there should be one for "Elite Scratchers" where the Elite Scratchers with the most points have their projects displayed.
P.S. And to everyone who mentioned competition among Scratchers, the way I see it, it would simply be a friendly competition to drive people to make better projects. It would raise the bar, so to speak.
P.P.S. And archmage, people like you would probably have millions of points by now, so you should be supporting me!
Offline
Nice work! Thanks for putting thought into this! You can post it on suggest.scratch.mit.edu and see how it scores.
My view on a ranking system in scratch:
- Scores and rankings work well on sites where the purpose is competition, like gaming sites.
- Scratch is about creating, or better: working with others, and building from other's work to create.
- When people compete for points on a site where it should be fun to create, the focus often turns to getting points and 'popularity' instead of creating.
- We already have this problem in scratch. Love it's and views are like our rating system, because the more a project has, the more attention they get on the site. (This is because tags pages are sorted that way. And a few users get on the front page for getting the most love-its and views. It's like our current "elite" section.)
- So the focus moves away from creating and building, to trying to get more attention than others...
- It's currently not easy to get attention/help to your projects without trying to become popular.
- I think this can be fixed by making it easier for scratchers to request help and help others with similar interests.
I wrote more here. Also follow that discussion for suggestions how to encourage activity in scratch.
Last edited by JTxt (2010-08-02 00:23:01)
Offline
i like the idea and maybe you could have a little emblem next to your name like the admins
Offline
I think things would get rather competitive if ranks were created, and there might be things such as creating new accounts and spamming comments just for a higher rank...
Offline
Actually love its mean almost nothing with all the people loving bad quality projects for their music (taken from another site) if you want to rate a project.
Offline
Maybe you should be able to give galleries points as well?
Offline
I do not think this is too much of a good idea.
What if someone made tons of really bad projects? They would probably get more views than someone who makes a few good projects.
A view shows that someone is trying it, not that they thought it was any good, they might hate it.
New users may quit, it will start fights between high and low ranks, people who already get loads of fame will get loads more while users left at the bottom of the pile are just considered as noobs even if their project is good.
If this is put in at all, views should take away your score, why?
If a project has 1000 views but only 12 love its, it is a whole lot worse than a project with 54 views and 12 love its, isn't it?
I don't think players should be talled that they are less important than certain users and more important than others.
Everyone should be treated fairly, people who got lucky with views would brag and get big-headed and new users would probably quit when people keep on thinking they can order them about just because they are a lower rank.
When a user first joins scratch its a time when they are most likely to think "Well this is stupid, I'm leaving", ranking them under everyone else would just make them feel more like quitting.
Spam will increase, users will spam links to their projects all over just to get a high rank.
People will just make loads of accounts to love projects on their main account and unfairly gain ranks.
Having a ranking system may encourage people who make gangs or are in gangs.
It will also make the whole site competitive, sometimes that's a good thing but sometimes not.
Everyone will feel like they have to constantly rush, and beat others. People will make gangs only allowing people lucky enough to get lots of views and so on.
It will also slightly encourage insulting and bullying.
E.G: "Low rank idiot, stop being lazy and make some good projects"
E.G2: "Ha ha, look at the low rank noob pretending to be cool"
Overall, I think this idea would have a really negative effect on the community, will make games worse, and make people quit.
Bad idea.
Last edited by colorfusion (2010-08-02 10:56:16)
Offline
Why not just give a special rank to users who makes good projects (given by admins or moderators).
On the projects page you add a link "Suggestions", a page who regroup the suggestions make by the special users. It would be nice to show the really good projects of new users.
Offline
VilceGT wrote:
Why not just give a special rank to users who makes good projects (given by admins or moderators).
On the projects page you add a link "Suggestions", a page who regroup the suggestions make by the special users. It would be nice to show the really good projects of new users.
That would then be like featured and curated.
I don't think scores or rankings will improve this creative (not competitive) community.
Instead I think we should make it easy to categorize and find the types of projects we're interested in, and be able to request specific help/attention, while helping others to increase our chances of getting help/attention to our hard work.
Our helpful activity and quality projects will speak for us better than a score or rank.
Last edited by AddZero (2010-08-02 14:05:31)
Offline
If idea is put in, it might make spam worse and more users banned for saying like 'Low rank silly, make some good projects!' (that was only an example).
New users might quit.
If Scratch team puts it the way so more views/loveits/downloads, the score should get less, then the old users with low score may quit, leaving new users not quitting untill they are old users.
Extremely bad idea.
Offline
THIS IDEA IS EPIC
FAIL
This idea WILL make all of the new users quit, be jelous (>_< spelt wrong I think), and if they stay, they might Adblock the better users so they don't have to think about them. >_<
Even Bunneh and Mouseh hate this idea.
Offline
There's no need to be so harsh...
..........................................
As I said [over a year ago ], I disagree - placing rankings is prone to make users show off, look down on others, cheat, and so on; a similar thing seems to be happening with post counts (when someone makes a thread cheering for themself such as "woo, 1000 posts", sometimes those with higher post counts act sarcastic
).
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
There's no need to be so harsh... :/
..........................................
As I said [over a year ago :P], I disagree - placing rankings is prone to make users show off, look down on others, cheat, and so on; a similar thing seems to be happening with post counts (when someone makes a thread cheering for themself such as "woo, 1000 posts", sometimes those with higher post counts act sarcastic :P). :(
Sure we do, Chris.
:D
But actually, I don't see your point. Higher ranked users would act sarcastic over someone getting some ranking below them? What's the matter with that? As long as they don't act like jerks, sarcasm is okay
Offline