This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#51 2009-05-22 21:23:13

DawnLight
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-25
Posts: 500+

Re: Spamming for a sig

Like what Dsdude10 said this should really be closed even if this hasn't been posted in a while.

Offline

 

#52 2009-05-22 21:32:55

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: Spamming for a sig

DawnLight wrote:

Like what Dsdude10 said this should really be closed even if this hasn't been posted in a while.

thats kinda funny because you just resurected it from the dead pile..now it is going to be seen again!


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#53 2009-05-22 21:39:39

DawnLight
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-25
Posts: 500+

Re: Spamming for a sig

ScratchX wrote:

DawnLight wrote:

Like what Dsdude10 said this should really be closed even if this hasn't been posted in a while.

thats kinda funny because you just resurected it from the dead pile..now it is going to be seen again!

That is the reason I said "Even if hasn't been posted in a while..."

Offline

 

#54 2009-05-22 22:07:39

keroro645
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-06-07
Posts: 1000+

Re: Spamming for a sig

bosox397 wrote:

GUYS THIS TOPIC SHOULD BE CLOSED!!!!! GET YOUR POSTS THE RIGHT WAY AND STOP CHEATING! ok?

Paddle2See started this idea. The original topic was created by Zelda123.
But then again, i read some of the posts in the anouncments about having to have 50 posts was a new thing.

Offline

 

#55 2009-05-22 22:37:19

ScratchX
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-05
Posts: 1000+

Re: Spamming for a sig

keroro645 wrote:

bosox397 wrote:

GUYS THIS TOPIC SHOULD BE CLOSED!!!!! GET YOUR POSTS THE RIGHT WAY AND STOP CHEATING! ok?

Paddle2See started this idea. The original topic was created by Zelda123.
But then again, i read some of the posts in the anouncments about having to have 50 posts was a new thing.

yes we know or i know


Happy New Year!
http://i45.tinypic.com/1nyasi.pnghttp://i50.tinypic.com/219pez8.pnghttp://i49.tinypic.com/e5s4zr.pnghttp://i48.tinypic.com/23l18hf.jpghttp://i49.tinypic.com/66zymu.png

Offline

 

#56 2009-05-23 10:47:34

Mozaz
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-19
Posts: 500+

Re: Spamming for a sig

I don't think spamming for a signature should be allowed because it takes away the purpose of getting one.


http://i33.tinypic.com/15i5fmp.png

Offline

 

#57 2009-05-23 11:00:29

Zelda123
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-11-21
Posts: 1000+

Re: Spamming for a sig

Mozaz wrote:

I don't think spamming for a signature should be allowed because it takes away the purpose of getting one.

Actually, the only reason the Scratch Team implemented the 50-post rule is to prevent spam from commercial websites. If normal Scratchers are going to spam to get their signature, we might as well put it all into one thread.

Last edited by Zelda123 (2009-05-23 11:00:52)

Offline

 

#58 2009-05-23 11:38:43

golfer3
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-11-02
Posts: 1000+

Re: Spamming for a sig

i think someone should close this topic

Offline

 

#59 2009-05-29 05:43:44

solstice
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-09-04
Posts: 55

Re: Spamming for a sig

Every time someone posts in this topic (yes I know I also am doing this) you are technically just adding to the spam

I also believe it should be closed because you should work to get something not just be lazy and get your sig in one day (yes this might be possible if you work really hard but it would be rare) (I also know I don't have my sig yet and I'm not going to TRY to spam) (yes i know i said this earlier).

Some people, if they really want to spam in there sig they can still do that if they just add to a topic like this for 5 minutes

Offline

 

Board footer