Scratch

soupoftomato wrote:

mythbusteranimator wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

I do not believe in judging books based upon subject matter

Then how the HECK do you judge them?
By their artwork?



Anyway, I prefer Harry Potter by a few million times over.

There are too many things that aren't explained (from what I've heard) and the idea that a 180 year old guy would be interested in an underage (challenged?) girl is kinda creepy.

Also, apparently Jacob chooses to fall in love with a girl that will always be 17 years old.

My sister refuses to give me a clear answer on THAT.

The creepiest part was him "imprinting" (falling in creepily obsessive love with) a baby.

Yeah

jukyter wrote:

mythbusteranimator wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

I do not believe in judging books based upon subject matter

Then how the HECK do you judge them?
By their artwork?



Anyway, I prefer Harry Potter by a few million times over.

There are too many things that aren't explained (from what I've heard) and the idea that a 180 year old guy would be interested in an underage (challenged?) girl is kinda creepy.

whatever gave you the impression she's mentally challenged? that's not addressed at all

well, I asked my sister why the heck kristen stewart stutters and "umms" all the time and she said the character is like that and has mental problems sorta

It depends. Harry Potter is aimed at children and preteens of both genders, while Twilight is aimed at teenage girls. The responses you'll get depend on which demographic is answering, not which is a better book.

However, in my own personal opinion, I like Harry Potter better. If you like Harry Potter though, you might want to try out the Young Wizards Series by Diane Duane, they're great! *In my opinion, they're better than Harry Potter*... SSSHHHH! DON'T TELL THE POTTERHEADS!

dontbombiraq wrote:

HotCocoa28 wrote:

firewolves360 wrote:

Oh, also, please give good reasons for your opinion. "Hot Guys" do not make something good, and sparkling vampires are not original. They're stupid.

Technically no matter how stupid sparkling vampires are, it is original. Had you heard of it before Twilight's existance?

she's got a point; the sparkling vampire thing was all her

She? Eh, whatever, I hate my username anyway.

Unless I'm crazy, and I got very confused.

HotCocoa28 wrote:

dontbombiraq wrote:

HotCocoa28 wrote:

Technically no matter how stupid sparkling vampires are, it is original. Had you heard of it before Twilight's existance?

she's got a point; the sparkling vampire thing was all her

She? Eh, whatever, I hate my username anyway.

Unless I'm crazy, and I got very confused.

she, referring to stephenie meyers

I find Twilight kind of pointless. Harry Potter.

It's fiction. It doesn't have a point I guess...

ManUguy2001 wrote:

harry potter is way better but if you asked girls the same question twilight would win by a landslide.
just because of robert

I don't know about that. I know lots of girls who love Harry Potter but don't particularly like Twilight.

I like Harry Potter better. To me it seems like it has more of a story to it.

Harry Potter. I grew up on that series, and am a total Pottermore/Potterhead/Whateveryoucallit.

jukyter wrote:

luiysia wrote:

ManUguy2001 wrote:

harry potter is way better but if you asked girls the same question twilight would win by a landslide.
just because of robert

to be fair robert pattinson is pretty great in general

he lived near me!! i saw him a while ago xD

Hawt!!!!!!!!!!!1

Yeah actually, I've like, had Harry Potter movies playing on the TV in the same room as me but I wasn't really watching because it couldn't keep me interested. I've managed to watch almost all of one of the Twilight movies though.