haxcharsol wrote:
Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:
Oh my goodness, Responible is back, reviewing Thrift Shop.
What does she have against thrift shops?
They're so thrifty!
Have you ever even been to one.
I tell you it's freaking paradise.

Offline
banana500 wrote:
haxcharsol wrote:
Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:
Oh my goodness, Responible is back, reviewing Thrift Shop.
What does she have against thrift shops?
They're so thrifty!Have you ever even been to one.
I tell you it's freaking paradise.
I dont like how much junk you have to sift throughb to get something good
/offtopic
Offline
bananaman114 wrote:
banana500 wrote:
haxcharsol wrote:
What does she have against thrift shops?
They're so thrifty!Have you ever even been to one.
I tell you it's freaking paradise.I dont like how much junk you have to sift throughb to get something good
/offtopic
It's quite fun sifting through it all, but that's just me.
Besides I got two GB Pockets for like $5 each.
Anyways I declare this thread back on topic. Backus On-Topicus. *swish and flick*
Last edited by banana500 (2013-02-11 20:51:45)

Offline
banana500 wrote:
bananaman114 wrote:
banana500 wrote:
Have you ever even been to one.
I tell you it's freaking paradise.I dont like how much junk you have to sift throughb to get something good
/offtopicIt's quite fun sifting through it all, but that's just me.
Besides I got two GB Pockets for like $5 each.
Anyways I declare this thread back on topic. Backus On-Topicus. *swish and flick*
What's this?
It's like a strange magical force is making me go back on topic.

Offline
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...
Last edited by ToxicQuillz (2013-02-11 23:36:45)

Offline
ToxicQuillz wrote:
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...
+1
That's just crazy. 0_0
Offline
ToxicQuillz wrote:
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...
And worst of all, he could be any one of us...
He could be in this very thread! He could be you! He could be me!! He could even be- *gets shot in the head*
Offline
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
Offline
He also hates imagination, apperently.
Offline
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
Grapes?!?
Why them?

Offline
Offline
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
He also hates imagination, apperently.
*cough* He mentions MY username. *cough*
Offline
haxcharsol wrote:
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
Grapes?!?
Why them?
Because you can make wine with them! >:D
In all reality, I love Scribblenauts.
Offline
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
I can't find it. Link please?
Miiverse:Ryanshy47Offline
BLU_Spy wrote:
ToxicQuillz wrote:
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...And worst of all, he could be any one of us...
He could be in this very thread! He could be you! He could be me!! He could even be- *gets shot in the head*
Offline
Animeboy975 wrote:
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
I can't find it. Link please?
Here's my page: GoodRatings4Kids
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
Animeboy975 wrote:
EpicGuy12345 wrote:
GUYS!!!! I found a new opponent! He's known as "GoodRatings4kids". He hated ScribbleNauts Unlimited, because you can make grapes! That's stupid!
I can't find it. Link please?
Here's my page: GoodRatings4Kids
BUT CRACKERS ARE TOO SALTY.

Offline
Responible...did a review on Beauty and a Beat. o.o
Can't link to it here since she talks about some of the "mature" things in the song in detail, but I kinda agree with her...but I wouldn't go that far as to say Nicki Minaj is "corrupting America."

Offline
epicepicman wrote:
It looks like nobody posted reviews yet... shall I start?
(For The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journeythis movie is epic and ido not like lord of the rings 100%but ilove the movie the hobbit an unexpected journey. this movie shows little kids amajination and how to use it .the book sticks to the the movie pretty well to the possitivive message that team work makes perfect task . thank you peter jaxon that thers no sexual content or shootin because shooting is the most violont thing that can happen in a movie.people say that if you like lord of the rings go and see it but i disagree. when one of the dwarfs said jaxie it means the a word as in a--s.this movie is not innappropriate and its epic spectacular action comedy and my favorite movie.the hobbit is nice i kept on cheering and kept on saying snap the whole movie .this move has lees violence than lord of the rings but its still awsome.there are are alot of characters drinking eating and smoking on a pipe . bilbo baggans is heroic and brave like harry potter .this movie should be rated pg not pg13 because this has less intece than ithought would have i wanna read the whole sereise to find out what happens in the the next two parts .i feel bad for the author because he had diedin 1973 he was born on 1892 he died when he was 81 years old. the movie dosnt have any seual content . .idont know what people are saying when they say this is a bad movie.this movie is the best movieof 2012 and its the end of 2012 the movie im going to see is parental guidence and write a review about it .I LOVE THIS MOVIE .IT ENDED IN A GREAT WAY . THE BOOK CAME OUT IN 1931 BUT THE MOVIE WAS BETTER .THAN THE BOOKif children under 2 want to watch i seggust parents whatch it with them its out of this world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YES THE HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY .THE SCENES ARNT THAT INTENCE IT SOULD BE RATED PG .COUPLE OF FIGHTS NO BIGGY.STILL GRAET MOVIE IVE EVER HAD SEEN !! DEFENETLY AGES 2AND UP
Yes. It's perfectly okay to take your 2-year old to movie rated PG-13.
I mean, obviously a 2 year old is inconsiderate as they are loud and whiny things, but as far as a two year old+ seeing the content in that movie? Maybe. If I remember correctly all death and such is entirely not human, and the only other thing wrong with it is some smoking/drinking. There are plenty of PG-13 movies accurately rated but it might not be as true for The Hobbit.
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
Last edited by soupoftomato (2013-02-12 17:54:25)
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
No one is saying that ResponsibleParentof2 is like an actual adult. It's a joke, yes, we understand that, you're speaking as if we don't. Also just bluntly saying that this thread has too many "gullible people" is kind of uncalled for and also quite rude.

Offline
banana500 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
No one is saying that ResponsibleParentof2 is like an actual adult. It's a joke, yes, we understand that, you're speaking as if we don't. Also just bluntly saying that this thread has too many "gullible people" is kind of uncalled for and also quite rude.
ToxicQuillz wrote:
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...
ImagineIt wrote:
+1
That's just crazy. 0_0
You guys acted suspicious but none of you ever decided that it was in fact one.
Last edited by soupoftomato (2013-02-12 18:14:06)
Offline
banana500 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
No one is saying that ResponsibleParentof2 is like an actual adult. It's a joke, yes, we understand that, you're speaking as if we don't. Also just bluntly saying that this thread has too many "gullible people" is kind of uncalled for and also quite rude.
Responsible is probably one of us.
But WHO?????

Offline
haxcharsol wrote:
banana500 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
No one is saying that ResponsibleParentof2 is like an actual adult. It's a joke, yes, we understand that, you're speaking as if we don't. Also just bluntly saying that this thread has too many "gullible people" is kind of uncalled for and also quite rude.
Responsible is probably one of us.
But WHO?????
My money is on ImagineIt making ResponsibleParentof2 then realizing, after calling out everyone's names, that it would be suspicious if his wasn't called. Therefore he is mentioned last by of2. Now, he intentionally brings it up to throw us off the trail. Admitting that he is GoodRatings4Kids is just another way of throwing you off the scent.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
banana500 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
(ANYWAY GUYS, when will you get over talking about ResponsibleParentof2? They are clearly a joke account, if they are going to spend time specifically on the Scratch reviews calling out the names of people on this thread. Actual adults don't do things like that. This thread is full of the most gullible people)
No one is saying that ResponsibleParentof2 is like an actual adult. It's a joke, yes, we understand that, you're speaking as if we don't. Also just bluntly saying that this thread has too many "gullible people" is kind of uncalled for and also quite rude.
ToxicQuillz wrote:
I wonder if Responsible has a secret Scratch account...
Since she hasn't been active after the original thread closed until now...
ImagineIt wrote:
+1
That's just crazy. 0_0
You guys acted suspicious but none of you ever decided that it was in fact one.
That's because that was also a joke.
For all we know, sure, Responsible is one of us, he could be you, he could be me, he could even be an artificial intelligence prototype who will eventually become self aware and plot the downfall of humanity, point is that the whole thing is a joke.
EDIT: Wow like four posts before I could get this up.
Last edited by banana500 (2013-02-12 18:18:24)

Offline