Scratch

I've still liked every generation. All have good Pokemon.

Here's my favorite to least:
2
5
1
3
4

4 had good Pokemon, but had horrible designs for some of them.

And I really liked Unova's Pokemon. Almost all of them had one good thing about it, design or strength.

And I didn't add 6 yet until the Pokedex for that one is full.

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

Last edited by Animeboy975 (2013-01-10 21:22:58)

maxdoss wrote:

Animeboy975 wrote:

I've still liked every generation. All have good Pokemon.

Here's my favorite to least:
2
5
1
3
4

4 had good Pokemon, but had horrible designs for some of them.

And I really liked Unova's Pokemon. Almost all of them had one good thing about it, design or strength.

And I didn't add 6 yet until the Pokedex for that one is full.

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

What about all the battle editions that were really important? The Special/Physical split was important.

By strength, I meant battle options. Like how good it is in battles, with physical and special.

Animeboy975 wrote:

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

Strangely, I actually wanted a fire dog starter. And then Fennekin happened. Well, technically it's a fox, but that still counts!
However, I didn't expect a grass-mole thing and a water-frog.

Animeboy975 wrote:

I've still liked every generation. All have good Pokemon.

Here's my favorite to least:
2
5
1
3
4

4 had good Pokemon, but had horrible designs for some of them.

And I really liked Unova's Pokemon. Almost all of them had one good thing about it, design or strength.

And I didn't add 6 yet until the Pokedex for that one is full.

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

Yes Generation Two is your fave! :D

Most kids at my school think that Generation Three is the best, and I can't blame them. :P

banana500 wrote:

Animeboy975 wrote:

I've still liked every generation. All have good Pokemon.

Here's my favorite to least:
2
5
1
3
4

4 had good Pokemon, but had horrible designs for some of them.

And I really liked Unova's Pokemon. Almost all of them had one good thing about it, design or strength.

And I didn't add 6 yet until the Pokedex for that one is full.

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

Yes Generation Two is your fave! 

Most kids at my school think that Generation Three is the best, and I can't blame them. 

My favorites are in order, from most to least:
3
5
4
2
1
this does not, of course, include the legendaries, I like all of them 
But I can't wait for more Gen 6 Pokemon!

sparky2008123 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

Animeboy975 wrote:

I've still liked every generation. All have good Pokemon.

Here's my favorite to least:
2
5
1
3
4

4 had good Pokemon, but had horrible designs for some of them.

And I really liked Unova's Pokemon. Almost all of them had one good thing about it, design or strength.

And I didn't add 6 yet until the Pokedex for that one is full.

But where's my water cat starter. I want a water cat starter.

Yes Generation Two is your fave! :D

Most kids at my school think that Generation Three is the best, and I can't blame them. :P

My favorites are in order, from most to least:
3
5
4
2
1
this does not, of course, include the legendaries, I like all of them ;)
But I can't wait for more Gen 6 Pokemon!

I find it hilarious how Generation 1 is your least favorite.

Really, you can't hate on it. At least you can't hate on FireRed. That's like the best game.

I had an epiphany earlier.

When the names of the versions were revealed, everyone associated them with chromosomes. This was supported by the DNA strand in the Japanese logo. Xerneas represents the X chromosome, which is female, and is a chital, a land creature. Yvetal represents the Y chromosome, which is male, and is a wyvern, a sky creature. What's female and earth-based form mythology? Gaia. What's male and sky-based from mythology? Uranus. This could lead to the conclusion that the Z creature will be sea based and will probably be similar to Pontus.

Last edited by agscratcher (2013-01-12 13:56:21)

BlackKyurem wrote:

banana500 wrote:

sparky2008123 wrote:

My favorites are in order, from most to least:
3
5
4
2
1
this does not, of course, include the legendaries, I like all of them 
But I can't wait for more Gen 6 Pokemon!

I find it hilarious how Generation 1 is your least favorite.

Really, you can't hate on it. At least you can't hate on FireRed. That's like the best game.

It is? It probably is in your opinion. I liked Gen 5 so far because of the graphics. I can't really vote on Gen 6 because it's not out and I haven't played it.

I see FireRed as the best game because:

1. It's a very faithful remake of the first game, better in some ways.
2. It was my first Pokemon game.

banana500 wrote:

sparky2008123 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

Yes Generation Two is your fave! 

Most kids at my school think that Generation Three is the best, and I can't blame them. 

My favorites are in order, from most to least:
3
5
4
2
1
this does not, of course, include the legendaries, I like all of them 
But I can't wait for more Gen 6 Pokemon!

I find it hilarious how Generation 1 is your least favorite.

Really, you can't hate on it. At least you can't hate on FireRed. That's like the best game.

You can hate on it. Watch Animalguy's top 5 pokemon generations. He does give credit to FireRed/LeafGreen though.

Make it real!

Diglett can learn Aerial Ace, and you can actually see them attack. WHAT IF WE CAN SEE WHAT HE LOOKS LIKE UNDERGROUND!?

zubblewu wrote:

Programmer_112 wrote:

I read an article recently discussing how the X legendary was a neuron and the Y legendary muscle.  I still think that it is the axes, and that the Z legendary will be some ninja psychic mind-infiltrator, because the z-axis extends to the imaginary plane, involving the impossible square roots of negatives.

1. square roots of negative numbers aren't impossible

2. z axis is as real as any other. and technically all numbers are complex (no +0i is needed for real numbers), so all axes could involve imaginary number

1. Yes they are. A negative number times another negative is a positive number, while a positive times a positive is a positive number. Name one negative number with a square root.

zubblewu wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

1. square roots of negative numbers aren't impossible

2. z axis is as real as any other. and technically all numbers are complex (no +0i is needed for real numbers), so all axes could involve imaginary number

1. Yes they are. A negative number times another negative is a positive number, while a positive times a positive is a positive number. Name one negative number with a square root.

every single one
we have imaginary numbers for a reason

Oh. Ok. But aren't all numbers technically imaginary?