Scratch

Wii U.

I personally don't have one, but the Scribblenauts saga is more epic then any fighting game.

WiiU. It has a cool controller, will be out-of-date later than the PS3, and is backwards comparable with the Wii.

Wii U

Wii U has barely any games. While I am blown away at what Nintendo did, it needs more games and more marketing.

The PS3 is still great but Nintendo did a great job engineering a playing style that won't be old for a while.

777w wrote:

cant you get scribblenauts unlimited for the pc

Yep

Wii U.

Although there is more to the system than Scribblenauts...

CheeseMunchy wrote:

I'd say Wii U If you're a casual gamer.

........... no. just no. Think about all the new third party support the Wii lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's life, so it wouldn't be worth it. Wii U just started, so it's entirely worth it.

PS3.  It has better games, a better control scheme, and I dislike Nintendo (meaning that I dislike most of Nintendo's work, not that I'm prejudiced against Nintendo products because I don't like the company).  IMO, Nintendo is mostly a casual gamer's company, but they refuse to be satisfied this and keep trying to branch into the serious gamers' market.  Which is perfectly understandable.  If they hadn't proven that they can't make that work far too many times already.

Last edited by maxskywalker (2012-12-28 22:40:28)

. [sleep .5] . [sleep .5] . [sleep .5] wut

Last edited by maxskywalker (2012-12-28 22:41:24)

maxdoss wrote:

CheeseMunchy wrote:

maxdoss wrote:

........... no. just no. Think about all the new third party support the Wii lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's life, so it wouldn't be worth it. Wii U just started, so it's entirely worth it.

Can you repeat that in English?

It is in English. If you didn't understand what I said, I said that the Wii U has the third party support the Wii mostly lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's lifecycle, so it wouldn't be worth it because it would just get outdated within two years.

maxskywalker wrote:

PS3.  It has better games, a better control scheme, and I dislike Nintendo (meaning that I dislike most of Nintendo's work, not that I'm prejudiced against Nintendo products because I don't like the company).  IMO, Nintendo is mostly a casual gamer's company, but they refuse to be satisfied this and keep trying to branch into the serious gamers' market.  Which is perfectly understandable.  If they hadn't proven that they can't make that work far too many times already.

So you say having to reach your thumbs down to move an analog stick is more comfortable than just grabbing the conroller and your thumbs naturally being there?

If there's buttons on the sides that you have to push quite frequently yes

maxdoss wrote:

CheeseMunchy wrote:

maxdoss wrote:

........... no. just no. Think about all the new third party support the Wii lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's life, so it wouldn't be worth it. Wii U just started, so it's entirely worth it.

Can you repeat that in English?

It is in English. If you didn't understand what I said, I said that the Wii U has the third party support the Wii mostly lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's lifecycle, so it wouldn't be worth it because it would just get outdated within two years.

maxskywalker wrote:

PS3.  It has better games, a better control scheme, and I dislike Nintendo (meaning that I dislike most of Nintendo's work, not that I'm prejudiced against Nintendo products because I don't like the company).  IMO, Nintendo is mostly a casual gamer's company, but they refuse to be satisfied this and keep trying to branch into the serious gamers' market.  Which is perfectly understandable.  If they hadn't proven that they can't make that work far too many times already.

So you say having to reach your thumbs down to move an analog stick is more comfortable than just grabbing the conroller and your thumbs naturally being there?

it depends on how you grab the controller
also he didnt uh say anything about how comfortable either device is

maxdoss wrote:

CheeseMunchy wrote:

maxdoss wrote:

........... no. just no. Think about all the new third party support the Wii lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's life, so it wouldn't be worth it. Wii U just started, so it's entirely worth it.

Can you repeat that in English?

It is in English. If you didn't understand what I said, I said that the Wii U has the third party support the Wii mostly lacked. And the PS3 is at the end of it's lifecycle, so it wouldn't be worth it because it would just get outdated within two years.

maxskywalker wrote:

PS3.  It has better games, a better control scheme, and I dislike Nintendo (meaning that I dislike most of Nintendo's work, not that I'm prejudiced against Nintendo products because I don't like the company).  IMO, Nintendo is mostly a casual gamer's company, but they refuse to be satisfied this and keep trying to branch into the serious gamers' market.  Which is perfectly understandable.  If they hadn't proven that they can't make that work far too many times already.

So you say having to reach your thumbs down to move an analog stick is more comfortable than just grabbing the conroller and your thumbs naturally being there?

Uh... yes?  That's exactly what I'm saying.  I'd thought that it went without saying.

I don't why, but I can't stand Sony for video games, so Wii U