Was the the first call of duty game you played your favorite? If it is. See this.
http://cheezburger.com/6882676480
Last edited by fillergames (2012-12-19 17:25:44)
Offline
harrypitts wrote:
fillergames wrote:
People are blaming Call Of Duty for the Newtown (Sounds like Nuketown) school shootout.
zat tis horrible. i agree vith 777w zat tis unresonabile
What's up with not using real English words?
Offline
Becuz I don't spek englyish. I Speke americion
Offline
harrypitts wrote:
Becuz I don't spek englyish. I Speke americion
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your words. Would you please mind using a translator from your language to English?(Even though they are not very good usually. It still would help a bit.)
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.
i think the idea behind call of duty is to make as realistic a war game as possible so at that point itd cease to be cod
also its still killing either way so i dont see why thatd be okay with you :P
Last edited by 777w (2012-12-20 07:12:44)
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
harrypitts wrote:
because I don't speak english. I speak american
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your words. Would you please mind using a translator from your language to English?(Even though they are not very good usually. It still would help a bit.)
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.
I made the original post readable.
Offline
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
harrypitts wrote:
because I don't speak english. I speak american
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your words. Would you please mind using a translator from your language to English?(Even though they are not very good usually. It still would help a bit.)
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.I made the original post readable.
did you now mr harrypitts
Offline
777w wrote:
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your words. Would you please mind using a translator from your language to English?(Even though they are not very good usually. It still would help a bit.)
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.I made the original post readable.
did you now mr harrypitts
No i am good at reading accented text.
Offline
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.
i think the idea behind call of duty is to make as realistic a war game as possible so at that point itd cease to be cod
also its still killing either way so i dont see why thatd be okay with you
Well it's not necessarily killing. You could imagine they get teleported to candy land, while if they just fall on the ground with blood pouring out, you know they died.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Anyways, if COD had lazer guns, and no blood, then I would play it. And of course, it would help if they disintegrated instead of stayed lying on the floor.
i think the idea behind call of duty is to make as realistic a war game as possible so at that point itd cease to be cod
also its still killing either way so i dont see why thatd be okay with youWell it's not necessarily killing. You could imagine they get teleported to candy land, while if they just fall on the ground with blood pouring out, you know they died.
if youre going to imagine people teleporting off to candy land when disintegrated with laser guns then i dont think it matters whether or not blood pours out, you can imagine all sorts of wild things
Offline
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
i think the idea behind call of duty is to make as realistic a war game as possible so at that point itd cease to be cod
also its still killing either way so i dont see why thatd be okay with youWell it's not necessarily killing. You could imagine they get teleported to candy land, while if they just fall on the ground with blood pouring out, you know they died.
if youre going to imagine people teleporting off to candy land when disintegrated with laser guns then i dont think it matters whether or not blood pours out, you can imagine all sorts of wild things
Basiclly everything i think of.
Offline
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
i think the idea behind call of duty is to make as realistic a war game as possible so at that point itd cease to be cod
also its still killing either way so i dont see why thatd be okay with youWell it's not necessarily killing. You could imagine they get teleported to candy land, while if they just fall on the ground with blood pouring out, you know they died.
if youre going to imagine people teleporting off to candy land when disintegrated with laser guns then i dont think it matters whether or not blood pours out, you can imagine all sorts of wild things
Meh. Looks too. Realistic. And not actually disintegrated. Just, a flash of light on them.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Well it's not necessarily killing. You could imagine they get teleported to candy land, while if they just fall on the ground with blood pouring out, you know they died.if youre going to imagine people teleporting off to candy land when disintegrated with laser guns then i dont think it matters whether or not blood pours out, you can imagine all sorts of wild things
Meh. Looks too. Realistic. And not actually disintegrated. Just, a flash of light on them.
So you want this? http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ND5H0qp7ufI
Offline
Meh, fun game.
In response to above posts, what if you were throwing grenades or something into a room? If it was just a flash of light and they disappear, then you have no idea whether you killed anyone or if the people in the room ran away.
Offline
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
if youre going to imagine people teleporting off to candy land when disintegrated with laser guns then i dont think it matters whether or not blood pours out, you can imagine all sorts of wild things
Meh. Looks too. Realistic. And not actually disintegrated. Just, a flash of light on them.
So you want this? http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ND5H0qp7ufI
No. I don't want to play nerf on the TV. I want to shoot lazers with actual GOOD graphics. Not the horrible graphics of that game.
@max
Maybe it would say if you killed them?(Sent them to candyland.)
Last edited by ImagineIt (2012-12-20 15:27:28)
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Meh. Looks too. Realistic. And not actually disintegrated. Just, a flash of light on them.So you want this? http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ND5H0qp7ufI
No. I don't want to play nerf on the TV. :P I want to shoot lazers with actual GOOD graphics. Not the horrible graphics of that game.
@max
Maybe it would say if you killed them?(Sent them to candyland.)
do you actually think its spelled "lazer" :P
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
fillergames wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
Meh. Looks too. Realistic. And not actually disintegrated. Just, a flash of light on them.So you want this? http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ND5H0qp7ufI
No. I don't want to play nerf on the TV. I want to shoot lazers with actual GOOD graphics. Not the horrible graphics of that game.
@max
Maybe it would say if you killed them?(Sent them to candyland.)
Its the closest thing i could find to a non violent First Person Shooter.
Offline
i dont really find shooting people entertaining
but if thats part of your process.
Offline
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
fillergames wrote:
So you want this? http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=ND5H0qp7ufINo. I don't want to play nerf on the TV. I want to shoot lazers with actual GOOD graphics. Not the horrible graphics of that game.
@max
Maybe it would say if you killed them?(Sent them to candyland.)do you actually think its spelled "lazer"
Oops. Sorry. Laser. It stands for something. Ugh. I forgot what it stood for.
Offline
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
No. I don't want to play nerf on the TV. I want to shoot lazers with actual GOOD graphics. Not the horrible graphics of that game.
@max
Maybe it would say if you killed them?(Sent them to candyland.)do you actually think its spelled "lazer"
Oops. Sorry. Laser. It stands for something. Ugh. I forgot what it stood for.
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Offline
PonyvilleSlugger wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
777w wrote:
do you actually think its spelled "lazer"Oops. Sorry. Laser. It stands for something. Ugh. I forgot what it stood for.
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
i memorized that after playing kirby's dreamland for the gameboy advance
actually i didnt even play the game i just looked over my brother's shoulder
Offline