u reviewed my project last time , can you review that project once more ? i have updated it - (link to project)
Last edited by Auto007 (2012-12-27 23:59:35)
Offline
secretmapper with Secretmapper
(I actually played this before reviewing it so it will be insteresting to see what it scores!)
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 10/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Incomplete?) 10/10
Sounds (Sound Effects, Music, Required?) 10/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 9/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 9/10
Plot (surprises? Changes?) 8/10
Gamer-Friendliness (Instructions, Hard, Easy) 10/10
Idea (Original, Remix?) 9/10
Re-Playability (Keep you playing) 9/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 9/10
This may be the highest score of this criteria so far although i am not sure until i update my reviewed projects project- which i will do later today. I did not like these "Chasers" They made me get around 1600 points every tiime i played. Getting 10/10 on 4 sections is no easy feat so congratulations! I have loved and favourited your project
Total 92/100
Last edited by Willpower_Reviews (2012-12-26 05:07:48)
Offline
numberonegamers wrote:
My game please!!!!
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/numberonegamers/2999022
It's got no music or sound but I will do it later, I promise!!!
you seem to have deleted this project
Offline
LockedOn with Generation Quest 1.8
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 10/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Incomplete?) 9/10
Sounds (Sound Effects, Music, Required?) 10/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 10/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 8/10
Plot (surprises? Changes?) 10/10
Gamer-Friendliness (Instructions, Hard, Easy) 9/10
Idea (Original, Remix?) 10/10
Re-Playability (Keep you playing) 7/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 8/10
A lot of effort was put into this game and clearly it passed the 10mb limit so you had to put it on Mediafire- hopefully in 2.0 you can move it to the main website. The reason i gave you a 7 for replayability is because once they get to the boss with the cannon and they die, they do not want to start again *cough* me *cough* I noticed that nothing happened after i died against the Boss apart form my character fading- the game sort of froze with no option to start again
Total 91/100
Offline
Thank you very much for your review!
Offline
Secretmapper wrote:
Thank you very much for your review!
no problemo, Congrats on being Front Paged!
Offline
Willpower_Reviews wrote:
LockedOn with Generation Quest 1.8
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 10/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Incomplete?) 9/10
Sounds (Sound Effects, Music, Required?) 10/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 10/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 8/10
Plot (surprises? Changes?) 10/10
Gamer-Friendliness (Instructions, Hard, Easy) 9/10
Idea (Original, Remix?) 10/10
Re-Playability (Keep you playing) 7/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 8/10
A lot of effort was put into this game and clearly it passed the 10mb limit so you had to put it on Mediafire- hopefully in 2.0 you can move it to the main website. The reason i gave you a 7 for replayability is because once they get to the boss with the cannon and they die, they do not want to start again *cough* me *cough* I noticed that nothing happened after i died against the Boss apart form my character fading- the game sort of froze with no option to start again
Total 91/100
Thank you for giving me such a high score! Yeah, my death mechanic is in it's early stages. Right now I just have it stop all the scripts, but I was originally going to have a re-spawn feature that would send you back to the beginning of the battle. However, I deemed it too hard with all the other stuff I was doing for the new version, so now that's on my priorities list for 1.9.
-- LockedOn.
Offline
Can you review my project - Scratch- Wolf OS
Link - (http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)
Offline
Aditya007 wrote:
Can you review my project - Scratch- Wolf OS
Link - (http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)
Just helped you
Last edited by Auto007 (2012-12-28 00:08:00)
Offline
Willpower_reviews, please review my OS
u reviewed evryones project but u r not reviewing mine!!
i am very excited to know my scores
Link - (http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)
Last edited by Aditya007 (2012-12-28 00:26:00)
Offline
Can you review the early beta of Rainbow chicken 3?
It just has the menu and classic mode. No mega survival or 2 player cooperative yet.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fillergames/3006618
What do you think so far?
Last edited by fillergames (2012-12-28 00:35:45)
Offline
Aditya007 wrote:
Willpower_reviews, please review my OS
u reviewed evryones project but u r not reviewing mine!!
i am very excited to know my scores
Link - (http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)
woah, give me some time
Offline
Auto007 wrote:
u reviewed my project last time , can you review that project once more ? i have updated it - (link to project)
Although your link did not work i found the project and i see you have pen ups and downs for paint. Have you made any other changes?
Offline
Auto007 wrote:
Aditya007 wrote:
Can you review my project - Scratch- Wolf OS
Link - (http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)
Just helped you
Nice try but the link does not work. Your link looks like this:
[url=](http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879)[/url]
When it should look like this:
[url=http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Aditya007/3002879][/url]
The link should be inside the [url=]bracket
Offline
Aditya007 with Wolf OS
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 10/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Incomplete?, Run Well?) 8/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 9/10
Sound (Music, Required?) 8/10
Simplicity 9/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 7/10
User-Friendliness (complexity, can the user understand what they are doing?) 9/10
Apps (e.g. calculator, word processor) 8/10
Originality (Is it similar to other OS’s?) 8/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 8/10
Half a mark more than Auto007's OS. Sorry if i have created some family rivalry as i guess you two are related! I like the Wolf going to each button when you click it, perhaps the wolf could be dragged to the buttons in a future update? I gave you a 10/10 for scripts after seeing the Starfield script
Total 84/100
Offline
fillergames wrote:
Can you review the early beta of Rainbow chicken 3?
It just has the menu and classic mode. No mega survival or 2 player cooperative yet.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fillergames/3006618
What do you think so far?
madiroby wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/madiroby/3006184
about GIFs
educational
Bumping up these two reviews
Although:
ANNOUNCEMENT
I am going on holiday to Center Parcs today (Back Sunday) so i do not know whether i can review on holiday so any i do not do today i will complete after my holiday. Just maybe i will be able to review on holiday and if that is the case then you can ignore this message!
Last edited by Willpower_Reviews (2012-12-28 04:48:11)
Offline
Willpower_Reviews wrote:
Aditya007 with Wolf OS
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 10/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Incomplete?, Run Well?) 8/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 9/10
Sound (Music, Required?) 8/10
Simplicity 9/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 7/10
User-Friendliness (complexity, can the user understand what they are doing?) 9/10
Apps (e.g. calculator, word processor) 8/10
Originality (Is it similar to other OS’s?) 8/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 8/10
Half a mark more than Auto007's OS. Sorry if i have created some family rivalry as i guess you two are related! I like the Wolf going to each button when you click it, perhaps the wolf could be dragged to the buttons in a future update? I gave you a 10/10 for scripts after seeing the Starfield script
Total 84/100
Thxx for ur Awesome review!!! Thxx for the score!!!
And we both are not related but we live in the same Neighbourhood
it was a co-incedence that we both have 007 at our scratch names
Last edited by Aditya007 (2012-12-28 06:28:46)
Offline
I have updated my newest OS. As Aditya told we live in same neighbourhood , he just lives one floor aboVe me. We have no hyper rivalry but we have a little .we're just friends .Thanks for your help about the link, I wonder how many people i have bumped with my old link type ?
Last edited by Auto007 (2012-12-29 00:57:01)
Offline
Fillergames with Rainbow Chicken 3
(I have decided to review this under the Beta Criteria)
Scripts (Programming, how smooth?) 8/10
Issues (Bugs & Glitches, Run Well?) 9/10
Completeness (How far is it off being finished?) 6/10
Effort (How much effort is being put in to complete it?) 10/10
Entertaining (Fun, Addictive) 7/10
Graphics (Sprite Design, Stage) 10/10
Sound (Music, Required?) 3/10
Idea (Original, Remix?) 7/10
User-Friendliness (complexity, can the user understand what they are doing?) 7/10
Personal Opinion (What I really think! This is the space for comments) 7/10
Woo Rainbow Chicken 3- of course with two previous versions i am looking for changes ofn plot and other things to make it different from the previous 2 Rainbow Chickens. I like the idea of hats although not much was shown about what they do yet. Also you can not fire your rainbow upwards yet which makes things more tricky
Total 74/100
Offline
madiroby wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/madiroby/3006184
about GIFs
educational
oh, you seem to have deleted this project
Offline
Remember when you reviewed my city games? Well, thought you'd be interested to see how another reviewer handled them, I was so shocked that G:4001 was only a little better than G:3000!
G:4001, read this first!
G:3000 review (with notes)
Last edited by Borrego6165 (2012-12-31 05:32:39)
Offline
Borrego6165 wrote:
Remember when you reviewed my city games? Well, thought you'd be interested to see how another reviewer handled them, I was so shocked that G:4001 was only a little better than G:3000!
G:4001, read this first!
G:3000 review (with notes)
ExtremelyGamer on Generation:4001 wrote:
Comment: Mother of god... I played Generation 3000 which was great and now I see a game better, exponentially
Only one point less for 3000????
Despite this mistake i will probably ask Extremely Gamer to review one of my projects as his criteria looks good
Offline