CN12 wrote:
CatPerson wrote:
Claude_Monet wrote:
Why is being rich bad all of a sudden, if you are successful, you should be praised for being successful, correct?
He isnt successful. If your succesful you would say "I worked hard to get this money! " , But Mitt Romney would say "I worked hard to be realated to extremely ritch people and get $81,000 every day! "
No, he worked hard to help entrepreuners start businesses like Staples and Bright Horizons(I think thats what it was called)
No, he bought a majority of stock in the company, which allowed Bain to control the company, then outsourced a bunch of companies to China.
Offline
CN12, would you please be a bit better than Romney and say how exactly he could help the deficit?
Offline
Laternenpfahl wrote:
CN12, would you please be a bit better than Romney and say how exactly he could help the deficit?
You mean the national debt deficit?
Offline
CN12 wrote:
Laternenpfahl wrote:
CN12, would you please be a bit better than Romney and say how exactly he could help the deficit?
You mean the national debt deficit?
yes
Offline
Laternenpfahl wrote:
CN12, would you please be a bit better than Romney and say how exactly he could help the deficit?
Here, I'll explain it.
He plans to help by giving big tax breaks to everybody and increasing spending.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
Laternenpfahl wrote:
CN12, would you please be a bit better than Romney and say how exactly he could help the deficit?
Here, I'll explain it.
He plans to help by giving big tax breaks to everybody and increasing spending.
Once again, jvvg, you interupt a conversation by answering for me. Please stop. He did specifically ask me. Laternenpfahl, I don't know much about the deficit so I don't really know how to answer your question. And no, I'm not trying to avoid the question.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
Believe it or not, I actually can read! (gasp!) I knew it was for you, but I was mocking you.
Well I didn't like it.
If you don't like it when I mock you for saying stuff that doesn't make logical sense, then say stuff that makes logical sense.
Giving big tax breaks to everybody while increasing spending on a bunch of stuff and saying it will balance the budget does not make logical sense.
What I say makes logical sense to me.
Giving tax breaks to everybody will make people more inclined to start more businesses and that will create more jobs.
And do you want me to make you a signature? I guess I COULD make a Obama sig, not that I'd want to.
Last edited by CN12 (2012-10-21 14:48:44)
Offline
i wish romney could change this
Offline
Laternenpfahl wrote:
i wish romney could change this
http://i.imgur.com/T8U8e.png
I don't.
Offline
I notice healthcare isn't anywhere in there (because he doesn't think that all Americans should get healthcare).
I also see he didn't mention his massive military spending plan in there, that they don't even want.
Offline
CN12 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
Well I didn't like it.If you don't like it when I mock you for saying stuff that doesn't make logical sense, then say stuff that makes logical sense.
Giving big tax breaks to everybody while increasing spending on a bunch of stuff and saying it will balance the budget does not make logical sense.What I say makes logical sense to me.
Giving tax breaks to everybody will make people more inclined to start more businesses and that will create more jobs.
And do you want me to make you a signature? I guess I COULD make a Obama sig, not that I'd want to.
Giving tax breaks to the extremely rich will do nothing except decrease revenue. They already don't spend a lot of their money, so I think that it should be put to use. Obama's tax plan also doesn't call for any tax increases on those that don't make rather large amounts of money.
When did I say anything about you making a signature for me?
Offline
have you done research on this?
read this
also it kills innocent wolves
Offline
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
If you don't like it when I mock you for saying stuff that doesn't make logical sense, then say stuff that makes logical sense.
Giving big tax breaks to everybody while increasing spending on a bunch of stuff and saying it will balance the budget does not make logical sense.What I say makes logical sense to me.
Giving tax breaks to everybody will make people more inclined to start more businesses and that will create more jobs.
And do you want me to make you a signature? I guess I COULD make a Obama sig, not that I'd want to.Giving tax breaks to the extremely rich will do nothing except decrease revenue. They already don't spend a lot of their money, so I think that it should be put to use. Obama's tax plan also doesn't call for any tax increases on those that don't make rather large amounts of money.
When did I say anything about you making a signature for me?
...Because Obama's plan isn't working...
You didn't. I need more requests at my signature shop.
Offline
CN12 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
What I say makes logical sense to me.
Giving tax breaks to everybody will make people more inclined to start more businesses and that will create more jobs.
And do you want me to make you a signature? I guess I COULD make a Obama sig, not that I'd want to.Giving tax breaks to the extremely rich will do nothing except decrease revenue. They already don't spend a lot of their money, so I think that it should be put to use. Obama's tax plan also doesn't call for any tax increases on those that don't make rather large amounts of money.
When did I say anything about you making a signature for me?...Because Obama's plan isn't working...
You didn't. I need more requests at my signature shop.
Check out my latest project. It says you shouldn't spam comments for unrelated stuff.
Anyway, Obama's plan works better than Romney's.
Offline
Honestly, I'm not fighting for obama really. I'm more like Romney isn't the solution, but because America isn't smart enough to adopt a new voting system, the spoiler effect would occur so vote for obama!
Offline
CN12, what is your answer to this
President Obama is moving us towards Energy Independence
Mitt Romney wants to be more dependent on fossil fuels
Offline
jvvg wrote:
Any idea why this just got closed and then re-opened?
No idea. I noticed it's getting a little heated, so keep it civil please so it can stay open
Offline
schusteralex2 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
Any idea why this just got closed and then re-opened?
No idea. I noticed it's getting a little heated, so keep it civil please so it can stay open
It's been heated the whole time, though. It hasn't really gotten any worse recently.
It's possible the mods are indecisive or just misclicked.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
schusteralex2 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
Any idea why this just got closed and then re-opened?
No idea. I noticed it's getting a little heated, so keep it civil please so it can stay open
It's been heated the whole time, though. It hasn't really gotten any worse recently.
It's possible the mods are indecisive or just misclicked.
Yep, at first I was afraid they were closing it for real and was expecting to see a close notice, but I guess it was probably a mis-click. If the were undecisive they probably would have posted a warning of some sorts first.
Offline
Laternenpfahl wrote:
Honestly, I'm not fighting for obama really. I'm more like Romney isn't the solution, but because America isn't smart enough to adopt a new voting system, the spoiler effect would occur so vote for obama!
+1
@schusteralex2: Your sig fits in here perfectly.
Offline
Why don't we just switch to one of those systems where
Every Political Party gets a spot in Congress (or whatever assembly) equal to the percentage of people in it
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
Why don't we just switch to one of those systems where
Every Political Party gets a spot in Congress (or whatever assembly) equal to the percentage of people in it
Because people are stupid and unwilling to do it. Or because I don't know if it's ever been suggested in a good way. And because I'm not QUITE sure how it would turn out.
Last edited by maxskywalker (2012-10-21 18:13:57)
Offline