Scratch

MoreGamesNow wrote:

[
In my opinion, if you have no understanding of political events, you probably should either take the time to educate yourself or refrain from voting.

i completely agree

CN12 wrote:

yousmiledatme wrote:

CN12 wrote:

Good for you! Check out my newest project!

yeah that's the best comedy project i've seen for a while

It's not a comedy project.

You coulda fooled me! It was so hilarious, the ridiculousness of it. XD.

zubblewu wrote:

Woah, bindersfullofwomen.com 

Oh, Romney. You've done it again. 

The abortion debate is NOT for Scratch, it's likely the most emotional issue out there.

The United States is the ONLY Western nation without universal healthcare. For an industrialized nation, our life expectancy is terrible, especially seeing as we pay about three times as much money. And why? Policies supported by conservatives.
The Affordable Care Act made healthcare more universal and improved the federal healthcare system's efficiency, which is already better than most insurance providers. A step in the right direction, yes?
Why in the world conservatives support shorter lifespan and higher costs, I have no idea.

zubblewu wrote:

CN12 wrote:

yousmiledatme wrote:

yeah that's the best comedy project i've seen for a while

It's not a comedy project.

You coulda fooled me! It was so hilarious, the ridiculousness of it. XD.

After writing my comment twice with the intent to split it into two sections, and having Scratch be stupid and delete the comment because it exceeded 500 chars, I have to write my analysis here.

1, 2, and 3 are the same point, and completely ignore trends and FACTS. Like how Obama stopped the spike of unemployment started by BUSH and has brought it down BELOW 8 percent.
4. That's laughable. Fox News is the only non-biased source? Give me a break. MSNBC was freaking out after the first debate.
5. I have a bit to say about this, so let's break it into parts.
5a. As I have already said, Fox News is full of terrible people and bias. Saying that it is "Fair and Balanced" is enough to make me consider it a comedy channel.
5b. Mitt Romney, in the words of Univision, threw a tantrum about being in a special. First he threatened not to participate unless he could bring in external supporters (they were supposed to be people from the university, but Romney disregarded that) and those supporters ignored requests to remain quiet. Next, when they announced that Romney had given 35 minutes and that the president had given an hour, he "threw a tantrum" and demanded that they retape the segment with that section removed.
6. I'm not going to write you another novel.
7. Please explain what "standing up to China" is, and when Obama did not do it? This sounds like you took a line off of Romney's web site just randomly.
8. I thought "Government does not create jobs," so why is it important to meet with the jobs council [/sarcasm]
9. So what do you want the government to do about it? Regulate the oil market? Give subsidies? How socialist. What is the gas price where you live? Here in Iowa everyone is happy because there is a government mandate of ethanol, correlating to a subsidy that leaves the current price of gasoline at about $3.50 per gallon. Alternative energy and cheaper, what's not to love?
10. Yeah, case closed, I'm voting for Obama.

News stations make a huge deal about any slipup the canidates make.

jvvg wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

OverPowered wrote:

Oh, Romney. You've done it again. 

The abortion debate is NOT for Scratch, it's likely the most emotional issue out there.

The United States is the ONLY Western nation without universal healthcare. For an industrialized nation, our life expectancy is terrible, especially seeing as we pay about three times as much money. And why? Policies supported by conservatives.
The Affordable Care Act made healthcare more universal and improved the federal healthcare system's efficiency, which is already better than most insurance providers. A step in the right direction, yes?
Why in the world conservatives support shorter lifespan and higher costs, I have no idea.

Because liberals don't. End of story.

The story isn't over.
You're saying that we don't support a longer lifespan and lower costs because we're making healthcare available to more people. I fail to see any logic behind that. So, next time you attack us, use an attack that actually makes some sort of sense. While you're poor (i.e. bad, not financial state) attacks are funny to read because they're completely bogus, I'd appreciate something that had actual content.

I wasn't attacking liberals, but rather conservatives.

Why in the world conservatives support shorter lifespan and higher costs, I have no idea.

My reply?

Because liberals don't. End of story.

So don't go insulting me when I'm supporting the same cause as you  .

Last edited by zubblewu (2012-10-20 18:46:33)

zubblewu wrote:

jvvg wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

Because liberals don't. End of story.

The story isn't over.
You're saying that we don't support a longer lifespan and lower costs because we're making healthcare available to more people. I fail to see any logic behind that. So, next time you attack us, use an attack that actually makes some sort of sense. While you're poor (i.e. bad, not financial state) attacks are funny to read because they're completely bogus, I'd appreciate something that had actual content.

I wasn't attacking liberals, but rather conservatives.

Why in the world conservatives support shorter lifespan and higher costs, I have no idea.

My reply?

Because liberals don't. End of story.

So don't go insulting me when I'm supporting the same cause as you  .

Oops. Sorry, I misread.
My mistake. Ignore my above post.
I'm a bit tired from cross country, so my brain isn't functioning quite correctly.

jvvg wrote:

zubblewu wrote:

jvvg wrote:

The story isn't over.
You're saying that we don't support a longer lifespan and lower costs because we're making healthcare available to more people. I fail to see any logic behind that. So, next time you attack us, use an attack that actually makes some sort of sense. While you're poor (i.e. bad, not financial state) attacks are funny to read because they're completely bogus, I'd appreciate something that had actual content.

I wasn't attacking liberals, but rather conservatives.

Why in the world conservatives support shorter lifespan and higher costs, I have no idea.

My reply?

Because liberals don't. End of story.

So don't go insulting me when I'm supporting the same cause as you  .

Oops. Sorry, I misread.
My mistake. Ignore my above post.
I'm a bit tired from cross country, so my brain isn't functioning quite correctly.

Haha I know the feeling. Perhaps you mistook me for CN12?

Even the Salt Lake Tribune supports Obama. [source]

Animeboy975 wrote:

Barack Obama likes Spongebob 

I hope to pie he wins.

Dude
I'm not saying Obama shouldn't win but
Hitler liked to paint
I like looking at art

Satire wrote:

What? My vote goes to romney; that incessant bird is a waste of our money! Plus, who doesn't love binders full of women? c:

Yes, Romney is a waste of money.
He wants to lower taxes on everybody (especially the rich) while increasing spending on the military who doesn't even want it.

What? If we give the army more money they don't want then we can extend our secret intel network until we have key players close to every countries leader(s) so that we can conquer the whole world in one fell swoop. Obviously.