Okay, I am truly sorry for starting that flamewar, and I give up about the media not covering any Democrat mistakes. Just forget I said it. Sorry if I offended you jvvg. And 16skittles, you are obviously a better debater than me.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Who even cares if Obama is a Muslim or not?
Some of the Republicans are quite racist. Them.
Anyway, like I said before, nobody should care.
And some democrats are quite racist. Citation note needed FOR BOTH.
Offline
laptop97 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
Who even cares if Obama is a Muslim or not?
Some of the Republicans are quite racist. Them.
Anyway, like I said before, nobody should care.And some democrats are quite racist. Citation note needed FOR BOTH.
Anyone can be quite racist
Offline
transparent wrote:
How will it better serve the country we call home?
because then those people will be able to marry?
part of serving the country is making citizens happy!
and it's something (relatively) easy that won't cost much money!
well at least it would be easy if people weren't opposed
Last edited by veggieman001 (2012-10-10 19:06:42)
Offline
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
Please don't start a flamewar about this.
Thank you.
Last edited by CN12 (2012-10-10 19:12:21)
Offline
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
The economy is going to take a while to get back, but it's on track. It takes longer to fix this sort of thing than create it, and it's been being created for a while.
Offline
stevetheipad wrote:
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.The economy is going to take a while to get back, but it's on track. It takes longer to fix this sort of thing than create it, and it's been being created for a while.
And I believe that Mitt Romney will help the economy more than Obama has.
Offline
CN12 wrote:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
do you have sources that prove this is true
Offline
This isn't meant to be a flame war, just a debate. Naturally there will be disagreements.
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
Is this supposed to be a riff on the "you didn't build that" quote again? I hate how the Romney campaign talks about entrepreneurship. They talk about it as if everyone in America could quit their job right now and become a successful and rich businessperson, and if they don't and are poor it's their fault. Are you uneducated because your schools were underfunded? Good luck running a business. Are you poor at the moment? Unless you intend to go into software, you won't have any capital to start a business. And there is no way that everyone in America can get an idea and pursue it for a profit.
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
The private sector has nothing to do with unemployment or national debt. Corporate profits are still at record highs. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer.
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
The president can't unilaterally make laws. That is the entire principle of the nation. If the Congress doesn't pass Obama's plans, we can't say anything about what his policy will do.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
Please don't start a flamewar about this.
Thank you.
veggieman001 wrote:
CN12 wrote:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.do you have sources that prove this is true
It's not supposed to have a source, it's from a pro-Romney flyer he got in the mail.
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
CN12 wrote:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.do you have sources that prove this is true
It's not supposed to have a source, it's from a pro-Romney flyer he got in the mail.
yes but he said he was posting it because he agreed with it
and you're supposed to source facts like that
Offline
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
There aren't too many middle class jobs to go around in the world, and a lot of them are with the government.
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
Unemployment is now significantly lower. The debt is going up because Republicans in Congress refuse to cooperate on anything.
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
The economy has actually recovered significantly.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
Please don't start a flamewar about this.
Thank you.
Another thing. Romney's plan to cut the debt is this:
1. Cut taxes by 20% for everybody
2. Keep medicare and social security as they are for a while (he said "people retired or near retiring", which can mean over 10 years)
3. Give big tax breaks to companies and the upper class
4. Increase the size of the military by a lot
I also saw a video where Paul Ryan was asked for the math behind his reasoning about how his tax plan was "revenue neutral". He just kept saying it's "revenue neutral", and didn't say a single thing to justify it.
Offline
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
There aren't too many middle class jobs to go around in the world, and a lot of them are with the government.
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
Unemployment is now significantly lower. The debt is going up because Republicans in Congress refuse to cooperate on anything.
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
The economy has actually recovered significantly.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
Please don't start a flamewar about this.
Thank you.Another thing. Romney's plan to cut the debt is this:
1. Cut taxes by 20% for everybody
2. Keep medicare and social security as they are for a while (he said "people retired or near retiring", which can mean over 10 years)
3. Give big tax breaks to companies and the upper class
4. Increase the size of the military by a lot
I also saw a video where Paul Ryan was asked for the math behind his reasoning about how his tax plan was "revenue neutral". He just kept saying it's "revenue neutral", and didn't say a single thing to justify it.
Get that from a flyer in the mail? :P
Offline
CheeseMunchy wrote:
jvvg wrote:
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
There aren't too many middle class jobs to go around in the world, and a lot of them are with the government.
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
Unemployment is now significantly lower. The debt is going up because Republicans in Congress refuse to cooperate on anything.
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
The economy has actually recovered significantly.
These were from a flyer in the mail, so I didn't actually come up with it.
Please don't start a flamewar about this.
Thank you.Another thing. Romney's plan to cut the debt is this:
1. Cut taxes by 20% for everybody
2. Keep medicare and social security as they are for a while (he said "people retired or near retiring", which can mean over 10 years)
3. Give big tax breaks to companies and the upper class
4. Increase the size of the military by a lot
I also saw a video where Paul Ryan was asked for the math behind his reasoning about how his tax plan was "revenue neutral". He just kept saying it's "revenue neutral", and didn't say a single thing to justify it.Get that from a flyer in the mail?
I've received tons of Obama and Romney fliers in the mail. The Obama ones are asking for money (since my parents are registered Democrats) and the Romney ones are asking for our vote (same reason).
Last edited by jvvg (2012-10-10 21:21:26)
Offline
I get a bit sad when people say the economy hasn't improved.
A quick look at the stats will tell you that you're wrong-ish.
The United States lost an approximate 8 million jobs from the late 2000s economic recession. After the end of the recession, 4 million jobs were created, with a net gain of 125,000 jobs after 2008. These are lower-wage and often underemployed jobs, but I hope you'll realise that people really want to work, even if it means being underemployed. People aren't just "moochers", but instead really benefit from programs like food stamps and other social safety nets.
And don't spout the "Obama Hates Buisness" foolishness; it's incredibly easy to see that the quote was taken out of context and that its usage as the singular Obama on buisness quote for Republicans helps to illustrate just how isolated an incident it was.
-----------
Does anyone here wish to support the Citizens United ruling, or the impact it and resulting Super-PACs have on the election?
Offline
CN12 wrote:
I have a few things that I saw in a flyer in the mail that I want to say:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
no
the government has the duty of fixing the debt, teaching people and creating jobs
CN12 wrote:
President Obama says the private sector is doing fine.
Unemployment is up. The national debt is higher. The number of Americans on food stamps and in poverty is higher.
i don't actually see how he can affect it but okay the private sector is making more profit anyway
CN12 wrote:
Four years ago, President Obama promised to create millions of new jobs and lead to America's economic recovery.
America is still waiting.
and not much can be done in four years!! however he has created four million new jobs and that's millions right or my maths has gone all weird!!
Offline
CN12 wrote:
President Obama believes government builds businesses and creates jobs, not people.
Not the job creators and entreprenuers who pursued their dreams, took the risk, and put in the long hours starting and building their businesses.
Actually, no. He said that the government helped businesses, not created entirely every single business in existence.
Offline
OverPowered wrote:
The United States lost an approximate 8 million jobs from the late 2000s economic recession. After the end of the recession, 4 million jobs were created, with a net gain of 125,000 jobs after 2008. These are lower-wage and often underemployed jobs, but I hope you'll realise that people really want to work, even if it means being underemployed. People aren't just "moochers", but instead really benefit from programs like food stamps and other social safety nets.
Un-biased source needed.
Offline
laptop97 wrote:
OverPowered wrote:
The United States lost an approximate 8 million jobs from the late 2000s economic recession. After the end of the recession, 4 million jobs were created, with a net gain of 125,000 jobs after 2008. These are lower-wage and often underemployed jobs, but I hope you'll realise that people really want to work, even if it means being underemployed. People aren't just "moochers", but instead really benefit from programs like food stamps and other social safety nets.
Un-biased source needed.
This source makes it look like Obama caused the recession, but as you can see, the large spike starts in 2008 (under Bush) rising higher than it had been in a while, it continues to rise for about a fourth of the first year Obama was in office (this is probably due to the inheritance of a poor economy, he wouldn't have had time to fix things yet) then the numbers start to go down again, after Obama has had time to take action.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
OverPowered wrote:
The United States lost an approximate 8 million jobs from the late 2000s economic recession. After the end of the recession, 4 million jobs were created, with a net gain of 125,000 jobs after 2008. These are lower-wage and often underemployed jobs, but I hope you'll realise that people really want to work, even if it means being underemployed. People aren't just "moochers", but instead really benefit from programs like food stamps and other social safety nets.
Un-biased source needed.
This source makes it look like Obama caused the recession, but as you can see, the large spike starts in 2008 (under Bush) rising higher than it had been in a while, it continues to rise for about a fourth of the first year Obama was in office (this is probably due to the inheritance of a poor economy, he wouldn't have had time to fix things yet) then the numbers start to go down again, after Obama has had time to take action.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
No... Obama raised unemployment by a lot and lowered it by a little. The unemployment rate is worse than when Bush was in office.
Offline
That is true.
Offline
laptop97 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
Un-biased source needed.
This source makes it look like Obama caused the recession, but as you can see, the large spike starts in 2008 (under Bush) rising higher than it had been in a while, it continues to rise for about a fourth of the first year Obama was in office (this is probably due to the inheritance of a poor economy, he wouldn't have had time to fix things yet) then the numbers start to go down again, after Obama has had time to take action.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000No... Obama raised unemployment by a lot and lowered it by a little. The unemployment rate is worse than when Bush was in office.
It is unarguable that unemployment has gone down since 2010. What is up for debate is how much the economic crash was due to Bush's policies, and whether any of Obama's policies either a) had significant impact before 2010 and b) whether that impact was positive or negative.
I'm not an economics expert, but I was under the impression that non-stock-market based crashes (e.g. the housing-market crash) take longer to rebound; furthermore, given the severity of the crash (greatest since the Great Depression), I wouldn't say that our current rate of recovery is that bad.
Offline
laptop97 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
Un-biased source needed.
This source makes it look like Obama caused the recession, but as you can see, the large spike starts in 2008 (under Bush) rising higher than it had been in a while, it continues to rise for about a fourth of the first year Obama was in office (this is probably due to the inheritance of a poor economy, he wouldn't have had time to fix things yet) then the numbers start to go down again, after Obama has had time to take action.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000No... Obama raised unemployment by a lot and lowered it by a little. The unemployment rate is worse than when Bush was in office.
Things in a complex economy don't happen overnight. Nobody can really expect for unemployment to go down the day he takes office; it isn't as though the recession could only be during the Bush presidency. By that trend, unemployment is lower than it was when Obama took office. Bush started the crash, Obama slowed it, and at the current trend we'd be back at early Bush presidency unemployment levels of 6%, faster if Congress actually passed Obama's plans.
Edit: Looked at the actual numbers on the bottom of the page. January 2009 (When President Obama was inaugurated) unemployment was at 7.8%. Unemployment peaked at 10% in October of that year, still less than a year after he took office, and too soon for his policies to have made a significant difference. From there it's a clear downward trend back to 7.8%, the same as when he took office. That's kind of creepy. Also, it is proof that a trend of unemployment is now down, rather than up, at a slope of -2.2/3. (2.2% less unemployment over every 3 years), meaning that assuming the trend continues, unemployment would be under 6% by 2015. If that does continue I think the dems will have no problem wrapping up Clinton 2016.
Last edited by 16Skittles (2012-10-11 18:48:56)
Offline
16Skittles wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
This source makes it look like Obama caused the recession, but as you can see, the large spike starts in 2008 (under Bush) rising higher than it had been in a while, it continues to rise for about a fourth of the first year Obama was in office (this is probably due to the inheritance of a poor economy, he wouldn't have had time to fix things yet) then the numbers start to go down again, after Obama has had time to take action.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000No... Obama raised unemployment by a lot and lowered it by a little. The unemployment rate is worse than when Bush was in office.
Things in a complex economy don't happen overnight. Nobody can really expect for unemployment to go down the day he takes office; it isn't as though the recession could only be during the Bush presidency. By that trend, unemployment is lower than it was when Obama took office. Bush started the crash, Obama slowed it, and at the current trend we'd be back at early Bush presidency unemployment levels of 6%, faster if Congress actually passed Obama's plans.
Unemployment is actually not at 8%. If you include all the people who are underemployed, or stopped looking for a job, that number goes up to about 14%.
My source? The Schnitt Show.
Offline
CN12 wrote:
16Skittles wrote:
laptop97 wrote:
No... Obama raised unemployment by a lot and lowered it by a little. The unemployment rate is worse than when Bush was in office.Things in a complex economy don't happen overnight. Nobody can really expect for unemployment to go down the day he takes office; it isn't as though the recession could only be during the Bush presidency. By that trend, unemployment is lower than it was when Obama took office. Bush started the crash, Obama slowed it, and at the current trend we'd be back at early Bush presidency unemployment levels of 6%, faster if Congress actually passed Obama's plans.
Unemployment is actually not at 8%. If you include all the people who are underemployed, or stopped looking for a job, that number goes up to about 14%.
My source? The Schnitt Show.
The source doesn't look too reliable...
Offline