Scratch
archived forums
#76 2012-09-28 13:26:55
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
The Scratch Team still has lots to do, but yeah, everyday is closer!
Goodbye 1.4. I'll always remember you and treasure your awesomeness in my heart.
RIP 1.4: 2007-2013 *Sniffles* *Sobs* *Bursts into tears*
Offline
#77 2012-09-28 13:46:48
- joefarebrother
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-04-08
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
My latest project is called
Offline
#78 2012-09-28 14:33:09
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Nomolos wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
The Scratch Team still has lots to do, but yeah, everyday is closer!
They've been saying soon for like
3 years now
though
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#79 2012-09-28 14:35:29
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Nomolos wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
The Scratch Team still has lots to do, but yeah, everyday is closer!
more like 
Offline
#80 2012-09-28 15:19:53
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
joefarebrother wrote:
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
Really... Just go on another forum.
Offline
#82 2012-09-28 16:09:47
- CheeseMunchy
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-10-13
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
ImagineIt wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
Nomolos wrote:
Wow! Scratch 2.0 seems so close!
Really... Just go on another forum.
Why would he/she do that?
Actually, what I'd like to know is why joefarebrother put the sad face.
Last edited by CheeseMunchy (2012-09-28 16:14:46)
6418,
Offline
#83 2012-09-28 16:23:04
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
dvd4 wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
Really... Just go on another forum.
same to you
I don't care about the tbgs though...
Offline
#84 2012-09-28 16:24:04
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
CheeseMunchy wrote:
ImagineIt wrote:
joefarebrother wrote:
Really... Just go on another forum.
Why would he/she do that?
Actually, what I'd like to know is why joefarebrother put the sad face.
He's sad about the tbgs. That's what I meant. Go on another tbgs forum. Like tbgs.tk
Offline
#85 2012-09-28 16:32:30
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Firedrake969 wrote:
I can access the alpha already.
But not sure if it's the real one.
How? I would like to atleast see it.
losethegame.net? Go on. You know your curious what this could be a link to. Just try it.
Offline
#86 2012-09-28 16:49:22
- Firedrake969
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-11-24
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
kyle-elyk wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
I can access the alpha already.
But not sure if it's the real one.How? I would like to atleast see it.
It is real.
Click the sign.
Offline
#87 2012-09-28 16:54:27
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Firedrake969 wrote:
kyle-elyk wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
I can access the alpha already.
But not sure if it's the real one.How? I would like to atleast see it.
It is real.
You mean the editor right? That's common knowledge in the AT's 
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Offline
#88 2012-09-28 17:01:17
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
zubblewu wrote:
Firedrake969 wrote:
kyle-elyk wrote:
How? I would like to atleast see it.It is real.
You mean the editor right? That's common knowledge in the AT's
but not every where
Offline
#90 2012-09-28 17:06:47
- RedRocker227
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-10-26
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
How
Why
Offline
#91 2012-09-28 17:10:19
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
Normal scratchers can get on the editor, and most of the beta testers are normal scratchers
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Offline
#93 2012-09-28 17:53:52
- thatscratchcritic
- New Scratcher
- Registered: 2012-09-28
- Posts: 2
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
be more polite please
can you not mini-mod everyone
if there's a problem with a post, then report it
+1
Offline
#94 2012-09-28 17:54:18
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
be more polite please
can you not mini-mod everyone
if there's a problem with a post, then report it
-1
Offline
#95 2012-09-28 17:55:11
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
be more polite please
can you not mini-mod everyone
if there's a problem with a post, then report it
-1
Offline
#96 2012-09-28 18:00:36
- RedRocker227
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2011-10-26
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Wes64 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
be more polite please
can you not mini-mod everyone
if there's a problem with a post, then report it
You're telling people not to mini-mod and then doing what could be considered mini-modding yourself
Also there's nothing wrong with mini-modding, it's helpful even
Why
Offline
#97 2012-09-28 18:06:01
- funelephant
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-07-02
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
Okay!
Let Scratch and all of it's spammers on!
Woohoo!
nicki begs to differ
Offline
#98 2012-09-28 18:41:00
- funelephant
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-07-02
- Posts: 1000+
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
Wes64 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Wes64 wrote:
can you not mini-mod everyone
if there's a problem with a post, then report itYou're telling people not to mini-mod and then doing what could be considered mini-modding yourself
Also there's nothing wrong with mini-modding, it's helpful evenhypocrisy is necessary to explain mini-modding
i think it can be helpful if done right (like explaining necroposting, or telling to go back on topic), but I see this as overstepping one's authority
He was telling someone to be more polite and not to be rude.
I don't think it's overstepping one's authority.
nicki begs to differ
Offline
#100 2012-09-28 19:49:28
Re: We've invited a 2nd wave of Scratchers to test 2.0
maxdoss wrote:
That's just stupid that normal scratchers can't get on.
Normal Scratchers can get on.
"I've worked so hard for you and you give me nothing in return. Do you need help... Or do I?"
Offline