RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Nothing's been confirmed yetBut rumours can be true...
Well yeah, they can be, doesn't mean it isthough
If I started a rumour that 2.0 is cancelled because the Scratch Team can't be bothered to work on it anymore then that doesn't mean that'd be true
it would be a false rumour,not a possible one
Offline
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
But rumours can be true...
Well yeah, they can be, doesn't mean it isthough
If I started a rumour that 2.0 is cancelled because the Scratch Team can't be bothered to work on it anymore then that doesn't mean that'd be trueit would be a false rumour,not a possible one
So what makes the one about a new rank not a false rumour then
Offline
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
Well yeah, they can be, doesn't mean it isthough
If I started a rumour that 2.0 is cancelled because the Scratch Team can't be bothered to work on it anymore then that doesn't mean that'd be trueit would be a false rumour,not a possible one
So what makes the one about a new rank not a false rumour then
Because Lightnin posted the topic on the new rank himself.
Offline
jontmy00 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
it would be a false rumour,not a possible oneSo what makes the one about a new rank not a false rumour then
Because Lightnin posted the topic on the new rank himself.
What topic was it? (link)
Offline
yeah, i would like to see it too!
Offline
jontmy00 wrote:
RedRocker227 wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
it would be a false rumour,not a possible one
So what makes the one about a new rank not a false rumour then
Because Lightnin posted the topic on the new rank himself.
does the make the sentence false ?
Offline