mjoypascual wrote:
Hi! Kindly review my first game --> http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/mjoypascual/2864430 Tell me what to do in order to improve it! Thank you..
I can't review because the project was deleted because it was inappropriate.
Offline
Hello there,
please be so kind and review our new game Pipepuzzle located at http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/pixelfriends/2866288. Suggestions on how to improve the game are very welcome.
cheers,
pixelfriends
Offline
pixelfriends wrote:
Hello there,
please be so kind and review our new game Pipepuzzle located at http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/pixelfriends/2866288. Suggestions on how to improve the game are very welcome.
cheers,
pixelfriends
Gameplay:30/50 (could do with mouse control)
Graphics:7/10 (allmost as good as pipedream (a pro pipe game (that is 20 yrs old!)))
How addictive: 10/20 (I love puzzles!)
Music: 1/5 (like the (small)SFX!)
Overall: 75/100 (as 2 lines above ^ Love puzzles!)
to improve I would say to integrate mouse control.
Offline
prokohtu wrote:
please review the project in my signature: the F1 2012
Gameplay: 10/50 (how do you play?)
Graphics: 15/20 (realistic on start screen)
How addictive: 5/20 (I would like it if I could play it easy!)
Music: 3/5 (A bit grainy and repetitive)
Overall: 45/100 (VERY hard to play (even downloaded!))
Offline
Hey, could you review my version 1 of wingman? It's not the best ever and music is coming soon.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Dsteenson/2871969
Thanks,
-dsteenson
Offline
Dsteenson wrote:
Hey, could you review my version 1 of wingman? It's not the best ever and music is coming soon.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Dsteenson/2871969
Thanks,
-dsteenson
Sorry for the slow reply!
Gameplay:35/50 (a neat little platformer)
Graphics: 5/10 (nice on the sprites,could do with more realistic backgrounds)
How addictive: 10/20 (play it in my spare time a bit)
Overall: 50/100 (neat!)
Offline
Offline
Here's wingman once again, but with music. M and N adjust it up and down. Moving on to another game soon.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Dsteenson/2871969
Offline
Dsteenson wrote:
Here's wingman once again, but with music. M and N adjust it up and down. Moving on to another game soon.
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/Dsteenson/2871969
as above +
Music:3/5 (cool song,could do with SFX)
and change overall to 60/100
Offline
Borrego6165 wrote:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100 (WOW Borroego6165 this is better than firedrakes!)
Offline
Martiscratch wrote:
Borrego6165 wrote:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100 (WOW Borroego6165 this is better than firedrakes!)
...
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100
I believe not. Generation:4001 is the same rank as Fallout. Please make them on the same rank.
Offline
firedrake969_test wrote:
Martiscratch wrote:
Borrego6165 wrote:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100 (WOW Borroego6165 this is better than firedrakes!)...
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100I believe not. Generation:4001 is the same rank as Fallout. Please make them on the same rank.
but I think Generation 4001-gold is better in a way I can't rank with numbers.
Offline
Martiscratch wrote:
firedrake969_test wrote:
Martiscratch wrote:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100 (WOW Borroego6165 this is better than firedrakes!)...
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout:
Gameplay: 50/50 (cool!)
Grapics: 10/10 (WOW!)
How addictave: 20/20 (Love it!)
Music: 5/5 (BRILLIANT!)
Overall: 100/100I believe not. Generation:4001 is the same rank as Fallout. Please make them on the same rank.
but I think Generation 4001-gold is better in a way I can't rank with numbers.
Give fallout 1 point less than on something, then you can rank with numbers. sorry firedrake for taking your position!
Offline
fallout's overall is now 99/100!
Offline
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout's overall is now 99/100!
what did you reduce?
Offline
Borrego6165 wrote:
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout's overall is now 99/100!
what did you reduce?
It is just no as good in a way only alterable by changing the overall.
Offline
Willpower wrote:
Martiscratch wrote:
The only reviewer for animations
I have to disagree, i review animations too.
I was at the time...
Offline
Martiscratch wrote:
Borrego6165 wrote:
Martiscratch wrote:
fallout's overall is now 99/100!
what did you reduce?
It is just no as good in a way only alterable by changing the overall.
well surely one of the categories had to go down, or it wouldn't add up right. perhaps a category which wasn't as good as mine? for example, maybe music should be the one that goes down one, seen as mine allows players to skip tracks they don't like and to easily add custom music which also works with the skipper, whereas firedrake's doesn't.
Last edited by Borrego6165 (2012-11-01 15:05:49)
Offline
Hi!
Could you review KeyDrums 3.0? Thanks!
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/shinyje … 21/2875600
Offline
My somewhat not really popular Rainbow chicken (Before you play read controls in the project info box)
Link below
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/fillergames/2837007
Offline