Scratch

I used my patch importing system (based off of all sorts of other versions of it) and it worked well!

when gf clicked

go back (10) layers

go to x: (0) y: (0)

forever  

hide

wait (pick random (0) to ((22) - ((Difficulty) * (2)))) secs

show

go to x: (240) y: (pick random (-140) to (172))

point in direction (-90 v)

turn ccw ((pick random (-2) to (2)) * (15)) degrees

repeat until <touching [Paddle v]?>  

move (Difficulty) steps

replace item (1 v) of [Xpos v] with ((10) * (round ((x position) / (10))))

if <touching color [#FFFFFF]?> 

point in direction (((direction) + (180)) * (-1))

end

end

go to x: (240) y: (0)

replace item (1 v) of [Xpos v] with [1]

change [Score v] by (1)

change [red dots v] by (1)

end

That's nice, I don't even need to bump it myself 

whizzer wrote:

Would it work with NXiii's patcher?
I'll try converting it to .patch. It should work.

It should work, because I once looked at the source of patch files and they are at least very similar to CS files. So try it, and if it doesn't, the second post on this thread has some information on how to install it manually 

set (awesomeness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) to 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

LS97 wrote:

whizzer wrote:

Would it work with NXiii's patcher?
I'll try converting it to .patch. It should work.

It should work, because I once looked at the source of patch files and they are at least very similar to CS files. So try it, and if it doesn't, the second post on this thread has some information on how to install it manually 

.patch files ARE .cs files. .patch is an extension made up  by NXiii.
Anyway, I converted it and it worked. 

Here is the .patch version in case anyone wants it.

when gf clicked

forever  

change [awesomeness v] by (999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999)

say [This plugin rules!!!!!] for (2) secs

think [I think...] for (2) secs

end

Last edited by whizzer (2012-08-19 04:34:52)

Are you on a Mac? Maybe try any of Alt+Click, Ctrl+Click, or Shift+Click instead of right clicking. I can never remember which works...

whizzer wrote:

.patch files ARE .cs files. .patch is an extension made up  by NXiii.
Anyway, I converted it and it worked.

Yes, I remember nXIII posting about them. The good old times when there were more awesome coders 

Greenatic wrote:

I just downloaded and installed it.  It seems to work perfectly.  Thanks so much for coding it!

You're welcome and glad you like it 

I was playing with this earlier to see how you did obsolete blocks, to make sure I agreed with you: but you seem to have just put the block's text.

The only nice way I can think of doing them is as booleans — "<obsolete!>" — so that they get colored red:

if <(join <obsolete!> []) = [a ScratchSpriteMorph()]>

Last edited by blob8108 (2012-08-20 16:26:15)

blob8108 wrote:

I was playing with this earlier to see how you did obsolete blocks, to make sure I agreed with you: but you seem to have just put the block's text.

The only nice way I can think of doing them is as booleans — "<obsolete!>" — so that they get colored red:

if <(join <obsolete!> []) = [a ScratchSpriteMorph()]>

And I'd also suggest adding indentation, so blocks inside the mouth of a C-block are indented one tab, and so on. 

obsolete blocks are rendered as just text because there are really no exceptions to any block in my code: what's written on the block comes out as scratchblocks as it is. It's a pity obsolete reporters aren't really reporters... but who would want to use that anyway 

I agree with the indenting, but it would take an absolute overhaul of the system (well, really just renaming the functions to add another argument) but that would mean current users of my plugin would have duplicate functions in their copy of Scratch. Besides, it's not that important.

but it doesen't work in other languages...
I tried it in german, and I got this:

sage [this is awesome, thank you!]

blob8108 wrote:

taddl wrote:

but it doesen't work in other languages...

@LS97: Reasons not to simply take the text on the block... 

Lol. 

LS97 wrote:

MathWizz wrote:

blob8108 wrote:

@LS97: Reasons not to simply take the text on the block... 

Lol. 

Well well well... it's the forum's fault that they don't support all languages 
I actually think it's a nice advantage, since you can always change the language to English, but can have (red coloured) blocks in your own language to use in other language forums! 

...not a bug, but an undocumented feature?

BTW, you posted 3 seconds after me (mine is in a different thread.)

Last edited by MathWizz (2012-08-23 12:40:29)