chongyian wrote:
Ok. I press it myself, but i dont hack or do anything, then i also ask my friends to help me also. To speed up, i ask them to help me. Since i can vote for myself, i also help other scratchers vote....
but if this is supposed to be scratch's ranking system of friendly and popular scratchers, and you got a ton of people outside of scratch and yourself to vote for you, and we all know that we didn't vote for you, you gain nothing, so why even bother with it?
Offline
But the 6 hr rule only applies to the same person right? If it does, means i can vote for others beside myself?
Offline
chongyian wrote:
But the 6 hr rule only applies to the same person right? If it does, means i can vote for others beside myself?
no
Offline
is 14 alot of votes
Offline
I found a bug trinary :$ sorry !
okay here is a small feedback on the website [ as a web-dev-design ]
I love your design.
I dislike your HTML but for the purpose it was good.
I would love if you can expand your website a little bit and make the voting websocketish! or realtimish! so that votes gets updated in realtime.
Instead of the huge table you can pretty much use a decent
<ol> and <li> model which will make way too much more sense
I like your sessioning system :-) really impressive , and the website was a delight , the bug btw is too leetish and i dont think it would be exploited :$
Last edited by fanofcena (2012-08-11 11:32:53)
Offline
This ranking thing is so [removed by moderator, please use respectful language when posting]
A person should be ranked high if his/her projects are good, not if he has many friends (if you vote for me, I will vote for you), or has a quick finger - vote for himself/herself many times.
Is the ranking so important to you all?
Why not go back to create some Scratch projects people would enjoy? I think that is where your satisfaction should come from.
Remember that day when your first Scratch project works? How much joy there was!
Last edited by cheddargirl (2012-08-12 06:27:16)
Offline
BigFatPanda wrote:
This ranking thing is so [removed by moderator, please use respectful language when posting]
A person should be ranked high if his/her projects are good, not if he has many friends (if you vote for me, I will vote for you), or has a quick finger - vote for himself/herself many times.
Is the ranking so important to you all?
Why not go back to create some Scratch projects people would enjoy? I think that is where your satisfaction should come from.
Remember that day when your first Scratch project works? How much joy there was!
...Ummm
EDIT:You don't even have projects nor friends.
Last edited by soniku3 (2012-08-12 06:40:01)
Offline
BigFatPanda wrote:
This ranking thing is so [removed by moderator, please use respectful language when posting]
A person should be ranked high if his/her projects are good, not if he has many friends (if you vote for me, I will vote for you), or has a quick finger - vote for himself/herself many times.
Is the ranking so important to you all?
Why not go back to create some Scratch projects people would enjoy? I think that is where your satisfaction should come from.
Remember that day when your first Scratch project works? How much joy there was!
no, ranking isnt important at all, its just for fun
Offline
Offline
chongyian wrote:
But the 6 hr rule only applies to the same person right? If it does, means i can vote for others beside myself?
It's for anyone, for example, I could vote for Veggieman001, and then try to vote for trinary, and it wouldn't let me.
Offline
Offline
Requesting deletion from list. Thanks.
Offline
777w wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
777w wrote:
lol, wolvesstar got her friends to help too and her and veggie were in a constant struggle for first place. or at least, it seemed that way, for i doubt either of them really care anymorewolvesstar97 admitted to me that she was using 4 proxies but I could tell she stopped after she said she would.
she told me all her votes were legit, haha
haha, of course she did.
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
777w wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
wolvesstar97 admitted to me that she was using 4 proxies but I could tell she stopped after she said she would.she told me all her votes were legit, haha
haha, of course she did.
if youre being sarcastic then i can bring up proof
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
777w wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
haha, of course she did.if youre being sarcastic then i can bring up proof
me too, she even admitted it to me.
do you mean proof supporting your claim or mine
im not doubting she admitted to using proxies, she also said that she wasnt cheating
Offline
777w wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
777w wrote:
if youre being sarcastic then i can bring up proofme too, she even admitted it to me.
do you mean proof supporting your claim or mine
im not doubting she admitted to using proxies, she also said that she wasnt cheating
Not all of her votes are legit either.
We were arguing back and forth on one of her projects because I saw her get about 20 votes in an hour. She said that her family voted for her and her family but then she finally said that she checked her father's computer and he was using 4 proxies. I had trouble believing that story for many reasons.
Offline
JJROCKER wrote:
777w wrote:
JJROCKER wrote:
me too, she even admitted it to me.do you mean proof supporting your claim or mine
im not doubting she admitted to using proxies, she also said that she wasnt cheatingNot all of her votes are legit either.
We were arguing back and forth on one of her projects because I saw her get about 20 votes in an hour. She said that her family voted for her and her family but then she finally said that she checked her father's computer and he was using 4 proxies. I had trouble believing that story for many reasons.
oh i was never implying that all her votes were legit, i was saying it was funny that she said she wasnt cheating and yet told you otherwise, hence the "haha" :P
Offline
BirdByte wrote:
xGamer89 wrote:
Why is my main account blocked for using proxies? I did not use any! (chongyian)
So, all of a sudden a craze stared and you got 72 votes in a day?
Last edited by wolvesstar97 (2012-08-14 11:31:43)
Offline