My favourite film ever!!!!!
Seriously, I thought it was absolutely excellent! By far the best Spider-Man film yet.
Offline
You forgot the end of the title. Add the "Was Epic" part.
Offline
sparks wrote:
I haven't seen it yet! I'm not sure how it factors in with the other Spiderman films. Are we supposed to pretend they were never made?
Anyway, I'll move this over to Reading and Playing!
You're supposed to...
It's AWESOME!!!
Sorry about that...
Last edited by coolhogs (2012-07-08 17:37:16)
Offline
sparks wrote:
I haven't seen it yet! I'm not sure how it factors in with the other Spiderman films. Are we supposed to pretend they were never made?
Anyway, I'll move this over to Reading and Playing!
It's a different series . . . so no it's not the trilogy canon but it's also not a "remake" (well it is but not so much).
This version is more based upon the comics. (Gwen Stacy is the love interest, the web shooters do not come from the Spider, etc.) It's also a villain they didn't use.
Last edited by soupoftomato (2012-07-08 17:35:30)
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
sparks wrote:
I haven't seen it yet! I'm not sure how it factors in with the other Spiderman films. Are we supposed to pretend they were never made?
Anyway, I'll move this over to Reading and Playing!It's a different series . . . so no it's not the trilogy canon but it's also not a "remake" (well it is but not so much).
This version is more based upon the comics. (Gwen Stacy is the love interest, the web shooters do not come from the Spider, etc.) It's also a villain they didn't use.
It's a reboot, not a remake. A remake is a new version of a film, with pretty much exactly the same story. A reboot is just based on the same source material.
Last edited by calebxy (2012-07-08 18:06:36)
Offline
calebxy wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
sparks wrote:
I haven't seen it yet! I'm not sure how it factors in with the other Spiderman films. Are we supposed to pretend they were never made?
Anyway, I'll move this over to Reading and Playing!It's a different series . . . so no it's not the trilogy canon but it's also not a "remake" (well it is but not so much).
This version is more based upon the comics. (Gwen Stacy is the love interest, the web shooters do not come from the Spider, etc.) It's also a villain they didn't use.It's a reboot, not a remake. A remake is a new version of a film, with prettu much exactly the same story. A reboot is just based on the same source material.
Yes, that's the word.
I knew that just forgot while making the post.
Offline
Ah, ok. Well anyway, what did people think of the film?
Offline
No, it's Amazing!
Offline
I liked it because it was closer to the comics. Did anyone miss the post-credits scene?
Offline
maxdoss wrote:
I say it's better than the Spiderman 3, but not Spider 1 and 2.
I thought it was much much better than all 3.
Offline
samtwheels wrote:
I liked it because it was closer to the comics. Did anyone miss the post-credits scene?
Aww, man...
forgot what's usually after credits...
Could someone link me to the post-credits scene?
Offline
coolhogs wrote:
samtwheels wrote:
I liked it because it was closer to the comics. Did anyone miss the post-credits scene?
Aww, man...
forgot what's usually after credits...
Could someone link me to the post-credits scene?
Offline
bump
Offline
calebxy wrote:
coolhogs wrote:
samtwheels wrote:
I liked it because it was closer to the comics. Did anyone miss the post-credits scene?
Aww, man...
forgot what's usually after credits...
Could someone link me to the post-credits scene?
o.o
Offline
I'm embarrased to say this...
but
is dis movie scawy? :3
Offline
There are a few scary moments, but not many. And they aren't that scary.
Offline