Scratch

funelephant · 2012-07-06 14:07:24

jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
Um, there is already a Fun Technologies, Inc. See www.funtechnologies.com.
honestly jvvg, we aren't selling anything! So it doesn't matter. As long as we specify that we aren't really incorporated, we're completely fine.
That's not true. If they find you, they can sue you and likely win. I'm just warning you.

*zippynk's disclaimer*

Dude, the last time they've done something on there was 2007. I don't think they would sue kids anyway.

XenoK · 2012-07-06 14:24:24

on their website, they don't have a copyright notice. and their logo, and name, isn't trademarked.

jvvg · 2012-07-06 14:26:39

XenoK wrote:
on their website, they don't have a copyright notice. and their logo, and name, isn't trademarked.

Just because there isn't a copyright/trademark notice doesn't mean it's not copyrighted/trademarked.

XenoK · 2012-07-06 14:36:58

jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
on their website, they don't have a copyright notice. and their logo, and name, isn't trademarked.
Just because there isn't a copyright/trademark notice doesn't mean it's not copyrighted/trademarked.

sure it does!

stevetheipad · 2012-07-06 14:49:17

funelephant wrote:
XenoK wrote:
LS97, everything happens for a reason.

This is not the time nor place to have a religious/philosophical discussion. hmm

LS97 · 2012-07-06 14:57:57

XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
on their website, they don't have a copyright notice. and their logo, and name, isn't trademarked.
Just because there isn't a copyright/trademark notice doesn't mean it's not copyrighted/trademarked.
sure it does!

Unfortunately it does. The U.S. copyright law protects everything without the need of symbols; registering the product's patent/copyright/etc only serves as a date proof of that copyright for legal authorities.

funelephant · 2012-07-06 15:41:42

FunTechnologies Incorpo isn't copyrighted, is it?

funelephant · 2012-07-06 15:42:42

stevetheipad wrote:
funelephant wrote:
XenoK wrote:
LS97, everything happens for a reason.
This is not the time nor place to have a religious/philosophical discussion.

neutral

jvvg · 2012-07-06 16:07:52

funelephant wrote:
FunTechnologies Incorpo isn't copyrighted, is it?

I think that is a bit to close of a name to get away with it. However, there are a lot of names that aren't taken.

funelephant · 2012-07-06 16:16:08

jvvg wrote:
funelephant wrote:
FunTechnologies Incorpo isn't copyrighted, is it?
I think that is a bit to close of a name to get away with it. However, there are a lot of names that aren't taken.

Like what?

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-07-06 20:23:21

funelephant wrote:
jvvg wrote:
funelephant wrote:
FunTechnologies Incorpo isn't copyrighted, is it?
I think that is a bit to close of a name to get away with it. However, there are a lot of names that aren't taken.
Like what?

TehFunTechnologies Inc. lol

jvvg · 2012-07-06 20:25:08

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
funelephant wrote:
jvvg wrote:

I think that is a bit to close of a name to get away with it. However, there are a lot of names that aren't taken.
Like what?
TehFunTechnologies Inc.

big_smile

I was thinking FunElephant Technologies or something (I'm pretty sure that isn't taken).

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-07-06 20:27:25

jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
funelephant wrote:

Like what?
TehFunTechnologies Inc.

I was thinking FunElephant Technologies or something (I'm pretty sure that isn't taken).

Also:
FunTechKnowledgeies lol
FunTechElephants lol
DaFunElephantCo.
TheFunLolCompanyElephant lol

jvvg · 2012-07-06 20:29:00

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

TehFunTechnologies Inc.

I was thinking FunElephant Technologies or something (I'm pretty sure that isn't taken).
Also:
FunTechKnowledgeies
FunTechElephants
DaFunElephantCo.
TheFunLolCompanyElephant

Not the first one...

XenoK · 2012-07-09 20:20:02

bump. sorry I havent been on. Just danced for about 6 hours, I'm exhausted, and won't be able to do anything atm.

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-07-09 20:23:57

Hey look!
"The GT" isn't trademarked!
I should register that...

jvvg · 2012-07-09 20:25:45

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
Hey look!
"The GT" isn't trademarked!
I should register that...

If you can find out how to register a trademark, please let us know, as I bet a bunch of have some trademarks we'd like to register.

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-07-09 20:33:49

jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
Hey look!
"The GT" isn't trademarked!
I should register that...
If you can find out how to register a trademark, please let us know, as I bet a bunch of have some trademarks we'd like to register.

See this.

jvvg · 2012-07-09 20:36:01

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
Hey look!
"The GT" isn't trademarked!
I should register that...
If you can find out how to register a trademark, please let us know, as I bet a bunch of have some trademarks we'd like to register.
See this.

Is that the real way to do it? That site is not a .gov

XenoK · 2012-07-09 21:05:10

jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
jvvg wrote:

If you can find out how to register a trademark, please let us know, as I bet a bunch of have some trademarks we'd like to register.
See this.
Is that the real way to do it? That site is not a .gov

you'll have a lot of fees to pay to the government. Well over 100 dollars.

jvvg · 2012-07-09 21:22:57

XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:
GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

See this.
Is that the real way to do it? That site is not a .gov
you'll have a lot of fees to pay to the government. Well over 100 dollars.

I looked it up, it's $160. That's annoying.

GeonoTRON2000 · 2012-07-09 22:43:54

jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
jvvg wrote:

Is that the real way to do it? That site is not a .gov
you'll have a lot of fees to pay to the government. Well over 100 dollars.
I looked it up, it's $160. That's annoying.

Should I report this to have the name changed to "Official Trademark Discussion Thread"?

jvvg · 2012-07-09 23:08:24

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:
jvvg wrote:
XenoK wrote:
you'll have a lot of fees to pay to the government. Well over 100 dollars.
I looked it up, it's $160. That's annoying.
Should I report this to have the name changed to "Official Trademark Discussion Thread"?

Haha. I think that discussion is over now.

Last edited by jvvg (2012-07-09 23:09:37)

funelephant · 2012-07-10 12:44:08

XenoK wrote:
bump. sorry I havent been on. Just danced for about 6 hours, I'm exhausted, and won't be able to do anything atm.

It's okay smile
I LOVE THAT GAME.

funelephant · 2012-07-13 11:45:42

I'm canceling this project. Requesting for close...

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2012-07-06 14:07:24

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

XenoK wrote:

jvvg wrote:

#27 2012-07-06 14:24:24

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

#28 2012-07-06 14:26:39

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

XenoK wrote:

#29 2012-07-06 14:36:58

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#30 2012-07-06 14:49:17

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

funelephant wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#31 2012-07-06 14:57:57

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

XenoK wrote:

jvvg wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#32 2012-07-06 15:41:42

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

#33 2012-07-06 15:42:42

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

stevetheipad wrote:

funelephant wrote:

XenoK wrote:

#34 2012-07-06 16:07:52

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

funelephant wrote:

#35 2012-07-06 16:16:08

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#36 2012-07-06 20:23:21

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

funelephant wrote:

jvvg wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#37 2012-07-06 20:25:08

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

funelephant wrote:

jvvg wrote:

#38 2012-07-06 20:27:25

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

funelephant wrote:

#39 2012-07-06 20:29:00

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#40 2012-07-09 20:20:02

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

#41 2012-07-09 20:23:57

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

#42 2012-07-09 20:25:45

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#43 2012-07-09 20:33:49

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#44 2012-07-09 20:36:01

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

#45 2012-07-09 21:05:10

Re: FunTechnologies Inc.

jvvg wrote:

GeonoTRON2000 wrote:

jvvg wrote: