Scratch

I am going to have to agree with you; that's what I've always seen the policy to be on the main forums here and I always thought it was what the case was in other parts of the site. That's kind of part of the rules; if there is a valid reason for something being thought as offensive, it's removed.

360-International, having received multiple warnings for offensive and disrespectful behavior, you should know that exaggerating your story is not appreciated. cpumaster930 has dustbinned hundreds of posts of flame chiefly caused by yourself. Attempting to gain support from forumers who did not witness the event is, frankly, underhanded.

This is the final warning. If you continue to cause trouble you will be banned from the TBG forums, and given a full list of reasons why.

The story that 360-International is telling here is completely exaggerated.

The TBG moderators have always strived to, and will continue to strive to, remove offending posts from the TBG, and therefore this amendment would be unnecessary.  However, the phrase "immediately and without question" in your proposed amendment is quite strict and was the reason we denied the amendment's approval.  We make decisions using our best judgment, and your accusation that we "are ignoring cyberbullying" is offensive to us in and of itself, as we make every possible effort to prevent flame from happening.

Furthermore, attempting to appeal to forumers who did not witness the event (no offense to them) while telling a biased story is a rather underhanded way of gaining support for your cause.

Last edited by cpumaster930 (2012-06-29 22:54:37)

360-International wrote:

coppearlix wrote:

360-International, having received multiple warnings for offensive and disrespectful behavior, you should know that exaggerating your story is not appreciated. cpumaster930 has dustbinned hundreds of posts of flame chiefly caused by yourself. Attempting to gain support from forumers who did not witness the event is, frankly, underhanded.

This is the final warning. If you continue to cause trouble you will be banned from the TBG forums, and given a full list of reasons why.

I'm not exaggerating the story at all. And it would've been better if the posts in the TBG Guidelines had stayed.   

And I'm gonna be banned for speaking my opinion? Fantastic.

Exactly. Why ban someone for a suggestion?

cpumaster930 wrote:

The story that 360-International is telling here is completely exaggerated.

The TBG moderators have always strived to, and will continue to strive to, remove offending posts from the TBG, and therefore this amendment would be unnecessary.  However, the phrase "immediately and without question" in your proposed amendment is quite strict and was the reason we denied the amendment's approval.  We make decisions using our best judgment, and your accusation that we "are ignoring cyberbullying" is offensive to us in and of itself, as we make every possible effort to prevent flame from happening.

Furthermore, attempting to appeal to forumers who did not witness the event (no offense to them) while telling a biased story is a rather underhanded way of gaining support for your cause.

That's a lie.

They're not doing a very good job. And if it's offensive to a user, then yes, it should be removed. Your best judgment cannot reflect another person's opinion. And you're not doing a lot about some of the cyberbullying. (Take my example, for example.) And you barely do.

Well, what do you expect me to do? You wouldn't let me be heard in the TBG forums. And tell me exactly how the story is biased, then.

This seems like it was dustbinned by one of the moderators, but I'll bring this back into the open because I feel it is important to make this closing statement:

This seems more like a TBG issue than an issue of the main forums. Technically, it shouldn't be erupting here, but more importantly: No one should be dragging out reasons for banning out in the open like this.

I'm closing the thread until further notice.