Scratch

41w4y5 · 2012-10-13 15:00:25

Am I the only one who thought this would be about CS:S

jji7skyline · 2012-10-14 01:12:28

What's that?

transparent · 2012-10-14 06:29:45

Counter-Strike: Source?

jji7skyline · 2012-10-14 06:46:25

Source(s): My PhD.

transparent · 2012-10-15 09:42:49

Um, why did you just post veggie's signature.

TheSupremeOverLord · 2012-10-15 10:01:56

Personally, I like HTML alot better than CSS. It seems like the developers cant agree on anything! But I enjoy programing, and as languges go, this one is not bad.

Hardmath123 · 2012-10-15 10:04:34

... it's not a language ...

puppetadventurer · 2012-10-15 10:13:36

transparent wrote:
Um, why did you just post veggie's signature.

?

transparent · 2012-10-15 11:39:31

puppetadventurer wrote:
transparent wrote:
Um, why did you just post veggie's signature.
?

'Source(s): My PhD' was/is your brothers signature and I have no idea why he just posted it. Even if it wasn't meant to be veggie's sig.

slinger · 2012-10-15 11:42:04

transparent wrote:
Um, why did you just post veggie's signature.

I was wondering that too tongue
It was probably a joke:P
I think it was supposed to read:

transparent wrote:
Counter-Strike: Source?

The source is my PHD.

Last edited by slinger (2012-10-15 11:43:10)

transparent · 2012-10-15 12:54:38

Ohhh

scimonster · 2012-10-15 13:24:17

Hardmath123 wrote:
Another thing I'd like would be dynamic-er styling:
Code:
div.myOtherColumn {
 height:100%;
 width:100px;
}
div.myColumn {
 height:100%;
 width:-dynamic[(this.parentNode.width)-100]px;
}
(stupid example, but you get the point)

I... WANT... THAT...

I'm OK at using CSS. The problem is i develop for Firefox, so it doesn't look as nice in other browsers. (Check out typeint.com/typer in Firefox, then Chrome.)

blob8108 · 2012-10-15 14:36:14

scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
Another thing I'd like would be dynamic-er styling:
Code:
...
 width:-dynamic[(this.parentNode.width)-100]px;
}
(stupid example, but you get the point)
I... WANT... THAT...

Aren't you looking for the calc() thing veggieman pointed out?

scimonster · 2012-10-15 14:57:03

blob8108 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
Another thing I'd like would be dynamic-er styling:
Code:
...
 width:-dynamic[(this.parentNode.width)-100]px;
}
(stupid example, but you get the point)
I... WANT... THAT...
Aren't you looking for the calc() thing veggieman pointed out?

calc doesn't give other elements' attributes. And WebKit doesn't support it. D:

scratchisthebest · 2012-10-19 18:07:51

Code:

div {
  prefixes-are-bad: true;
  -moz-prefixes-are-bad: true;
  -o-prefixes-are-bad: true;
  -webkit-prefixes-are-bad: true;
  -ms-prefixes-are-bad: true;
}

That is all.

ahirbhairav · 2012-10-19 19:52:13

CSS 4 selectors are out.

beanandbean · 2013-02-24 01:28:10

Hardmath123 wrote:
I'm good at it, but I don't particularly like how every browser has its own specs. Seriously, why can't these guys actually agree on something once in a while?

I agree with you. Another terrible thing is, when a new CSS standard come out, we'll have to wait for a long time before most browsers add support on it.

Scratch

archived forums

#101 2012-10-13 15:00:25

Re: CSS Discussion

#102 2012-10-14 01:12:28

Re: CSS Discussion

#103 2012-10-14 06:29:45

Re: CSS Discussion

#104 2012-10-14 06:46:25

Re: CSS Discussion

#105 2012-10-15 09:42:49

Re: CSS Discussion

#106 2012-10-15 10:01:56

Re: CSS Discussion

#107 2012-10-15 10:04:34

Re: CSS Discussion

#108 2012-10-15 10:13:36

Re: CSS Discussion

transparent wrote:

#109 2012-10-15 11:39:31

Re: CSS Discussion

puppetadventurer wrote:

transparent wrote:

#110 2012-10-15 11:42:04

Re: CSS Discussion

transparent wrote:

transparent wrote:

#111 2012-10-15 12:54:38

Re: CSS Discussion

#112 2012-10-15 13:24:17

Re: CSS Discussion

Hardmath123 wrote:

Code:

#113 2012-10-15 14:36:14

Re: CSS Discussion

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

Code:

#114 2012-10-15 14:57:03

Re: CSS Discussion

blob8108 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

Code:

#115 2012-10-19 18:07:51

Re: CSS Discussion

Code:

#116 2012-10-19 19:52:13

Re: CSS Discussion

#117 2013-02-24 01:28:10

Re: CSS Discussion

Hardmath123 wrote:

Board footer